How Did The Colonists Rebellion Justified

507 Words2 Pages

I believe that the Colonist were justified within their actions of rebelling against the numerous acts that were imposed by Great Britain. The purpose of these laws punished the colonist regarding the Boston tea party and other protests that had gone on throughout that period. Within their rebellion, they believed that they were treated unfairly and unethically. As of these acts, these were the four main verdicts that were ratified by the British Parliament and how they had motivated the incentive of the American Revolution.
The Coercive Acts were a series of four verdicts that were established by the British administration to bring about submission amongst the colonists. The first of these acts, The Boston port act, was a law that closed the port of Boston until the east India company had been repaid for the tea destroyed in the events of the Boston tea party in protest of the taxes that were imposed. The Colonists had objected, and felt that the port …show more content…

They sought it out as being punished without given the opportunity to testify for their own defense. The second act, the Massachusetts Government Act, was to better regulate the administration. Almost every position in the government such as officials, juries, and sheriffs were strictly appointed by a governor or a monarch. It had limited the proceedings of town meetings in Massachusetts, only unless it was called upon by the governor. The colonists outside of Massachusetts had feared that their governments could be changed by the legislation of the Parliament. The purpose in contrast had essentially limited Massachusetts’ right for independence. The third act, the Administration of justice act, had given power to all trials to be sent to Great Britain. The act instructed that witnesses would be paid for travel expenses. In practice, a few colonists could afford to leave their work

Open Document