Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hitler and his policies
Impact of the Anglo Boer wars
Biography of adolf hitler
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hitler and his policies
Hoppie Groenewald’s Legacy upon Peekay’s Life Humans are ignorant. History has been marked by violence, hate, and discrimination. The name and legacy of Adolf Hitler still brings chills to a world that vividly remembers the millions of Jewish lives lost. Such genocide occurs every day. An obscure, yet no less horrific instance of such prejudice is the prosecution of Englishmen in early 20th century South Africa. After fighting several wars, the Boers develop a sense of loathing and disgust towards the English, and pass it to their children. Courtenay’s novel The Power of One introduces us to Peekay in such a toxic environment. The intellectually precocious Peekay realizes at the age of five that he is targeted for being different: …show more content…
After meeting Hoppie and watching him defeat the giant Jackhammer Smit, however, Peekay learns a mantra that will change his life forever: “Fight first with the head, then with the heart” (103). Peekay remembers Hoppie’s slogan for the rest of his life, and applies it not only to boxing, but also to his life; by doing so, he avenges his miserable childhood at the hands of the Judge. At first, Peekay uses Hoppie’s dictum only in boxing. In every match, he emphasizes the proverb to himself before he fights: “First with your head, then with your heart, first with your head, then with your heart, Hoppie’s words drummed through my brain as I tried to stay alive” (220). Peekay repeats the mantra several times, producing a serious, focused atmosphere. His use of “drummed” emphasizes this methodical repetition. By reiterating the phrase, Peekay stresses the importance of the mantra in his boxing life. And it turns out that following the motto is wise. Peekay realizes that he has to make Bronkhorst step closer to him by using his head and analyzing his opponent. Then, in order to make him do so, Peekay uses his heart: “Come closer, Boer bastard. …show more content…
When Peekay wants Morrie to start betting on the Geldenhuis match, Morrie is doubtful because he is “making book in the dark” (339). Peekay considers Morrie the embodiment of Hoppie’s advice when Morrie says: “No offense Peekay, but next time first the facts then the trust.” (340). Peekay appreciates that Morrie is able to place logic over friendship. When Peekay wins, however, Morrie is able to trust in his skill. Morrie and Peekay also use their head in setting up a gigantic scam. When Geldenhuis and Morrie bet on the outcome of the match, Morrie asks Geldenhuis: “Twenty percent of the winnings or fifty quid now, it’s your choice” (403). Morrie, knowing that Geldenhuis had never seen a 50-quid bill, used his knowledge of psychology to earn a profit, as twenty percent of the winnings would have amounted to far more than 50 pounds. Morrie deliberately uses the word “now”, knowing that Geldenhuis would seek immediate gratification. After Morrie gives Geldenhuis the 50 pounds, Geldenhuis foolishly challenges Peekay to a match, and Morrie bets on Peekay: “I bet you fifty quid Peekay smacks your arse!” (405). By using provocative language such as “smacks your arse”, Morrie is deliberately goading Geldenhuis into accepting the bet. Geldenhuis, a proud man, is in a dilemma: he either bets and, in all probability, loses fifty quid; or he can deny the bet and admit to himself that
When Butch was nine years old, his mother sent him away with a quarter and told him never to come back. He rode the subway for days, until he was picked up by the police and taken to court. This was in August 1950, he was sent to the Children’s Center. It would be the beginning of a lifetime of institutions for Butch. Butch had to learn at a young age to defend himself. To be the toughest kid in the institution. He had to strike first or he would get hurt. He was all he had. His mother did not want him. He learned early “that a willingness to fight was essential to survival.” (1) Butch became hard to handle at the Children’s Center. He was then sent to Wiltwyck, another institution for boys. “Wiltwick had become nationally renowned school, officiall...
Another huge historical impact with dehumanization is shown profoundly in A Lesson Before Dying. Ernest Gaines does a great job of showing dehumanization in the 1940’s. A young man named Jefferson, who was in the wrong place at the wrong time, is on trial for robbery and murder of a gas station clerk. While Jefferson’s lawyer is supposed to be defending him, he instead makes him out to be a dumb hog who couldn’t possibly have the brains to carry out such plan. He later goes on to say “oh, pardon me, pardon me, I surely did not mean to insult your intelligence by saying ‘man’ would you please forgive me for committing such an error?” He dehumanizes Jefferson by saying he is no longer a man but now a hog. Dehumanization is a very serious issue and it is shown profoundly in these two readings Maus I, Maus II, and A Lesson Before Dying. The authors do a grand job of using this theme in their writings and keeping the reader’s interest by making the reader unable to put down the book. These two writings impact the characters greatly both similarly and differently. Some characters can handle it and let it make them stronger where others cannot bear to live
During the course of this work, many ideas and themes are portrayed and readers are able to view subjects that surround the main topic of racial injustice and intolerance. With the three main narrators, Minny Jackson, Aibileen Clark, and Skeeter Phelan, the audience quickly gains an insight on how racial inequalities affected everyone. These thoughts help to form a plot that can easily keep readers entertained throughout the novel. During the course of the novel, there are many points in the plot that decide the actions and events other cha...
I was in complete and utter shock when I began to read Disposable People. The heart-wrenching tale of Seba, a newly freed slave, shook my understanding of people in today’s society, as well as their interactions with each other. I sat in silence as I read Seba’s story. “There they [Seba’s French mistress and husband] stripped me naked, tied my hands behind my back, and began to whip me with a wire attached to a broomstick (Bales 2).” I tried to grasp the magnitude of the situation.
After a journey into the dark history of Europe and Africa with Sven Lindqvist, I found myself shocked. It’s earth shattering. Ideas and historical events are presented through a journal/proposal of his unique view on racism. Lindqvist raises questions as to where racism was spurred and why what happened in late 1800’s and early 1900’s lead to the holocaust. Including religion, personal human values, advanced warfare and even societies’ impact as a whole. His travels through the Sahara and Africa in the early chapters show a more current day view of society over seas. The description of the desolate continent and harsh conditions paints a picture of what previous civilization lived through. He explains that part of the reason he has traveled to the desert is to feel the space all around him, a definite emptiness if you will. As his travels progress he introduces his own family life that pertains to the human emotion, which is also a big focus point in this book. Childhood beatings over taking the lord’s name in vain, dropped calls from his daughter that leave him torn and sad. He does an excellent job on taking the reader on a personal journey with him through his current day traveling and even his early life. Linking these personal experiences and tying in histories misconceptions of “right and wrong” is what makes this book so valuable. Lindqvist gives a relevant and educated answer to the question of how racism became such a terrible tribulation in all parts of the world.
In consideration of how power functioned in both the Crucible and the Holocaust a tend of how an individual can use power to control, influence, benefit themselves, and also protect themselves from attacks can be seen. Human Nature compels us to gain power because of want, but once we have the power we will inherently use it to influence other because of the need of the individual to have their ideas agreed with. Power can either make a leader great or make a whole society or movement corrupt. Lessons can be used about how to effectively use power to properly initiate change and make a positive impact on the world.
Racism is a targeted issue in Harper Lee’s 1930s-based novel, To Kill a Mockingbird. In Maycomb County, a fictional town in Alabama, it seemed taboo to be antiracist. When a trial involving a black man accused of raping a local white female, eyebrows are raised and tempers take over the town. At this time, it is highly unlikely for a black man to be acquitted of charges even with a substantial amount of evidence to prove him innocent. With little hope, Tom Robinson is defended by Atticus, a local lawyer. Atticus knows nearly immediately that this case will not end in justice due to the color of Tom Robinson’s skin (Lee, 80).
...n but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what. You rarely win, but sometimes you do.” [Lee, 1960, p. 149]
Power, the perception of superiority over another human, is the source of many conflicts between people. Feeling inferior causes people to act beyond their normal personality. John Knowles strongly demonstrates this point in his work, A Separate Peace. In the relationship between Finny and Gene, Gene sets himself up to be inferior in the balance of power which motivates him to act irrationally to take power back from Finny.
Often, too much power can go to that particular person’s head, and he/she can become corrupt. As readers have seen in literature, abuses of power are often harmful to the abuser and their subjects. Corrupted authority and abuses of power eventually lead to the collapse of society. This concept is shown many times throughout the novel Lord Of the Flies and the short story “I Only Came to Use the Phone”. Displayed through characters and actions, abusive power has dominated what should be morally correct in literature.
Imagine a world where evil and unjust actions are based on the color of skin; a world where some don’t even realize that they are prejudicing. In the book To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee, these themes are present. People and how they commit evil, hypocritical, and unjust acts. We see these themes and great issues through the point of view of a child; the vigorous, youthful, elementary-aged Scout. Through this character Harper Lee shows the innocence of children, and what they go through in our inequitable world.
Another work which displayed prejudice is the nonfictional essay entitled, “Black Men and Public Spaces” by Brent Staples. This essay tells the reader of the author’s own persecution, which is the result of people’s fear of him due to his skin tone. One final example of the aforementioned prejudicial nature of people is George Orwell’s 1936 essay, “Shooting an Elephant”. Orwell paints a picture of an imperialistic empire like England abusing the people of India, as well as the the people of Burma, current day Myanmar, mistreating him. Being treated poorly will lead to some attempt to fall in line with everyone else, or appease others. The simple reasoning behind this course of action is that one could be unfairly punished for their inability to fit in. In fact, people in power may very well become violent to those who’re unfamiliar to how they themselves are. Unjust behavior can be the result of any number of things, the most common reasons being either one’s ethnicity, or one’s social
From the displays of power that have been shown through out this essay, we see that this story is a story about power. Power is the story is primarily about peoples need for some small amount of power to survive in life and to feel that hey have a purpose within their society which every society it may be whether its is Gilead or Nazi Germany or modern day Britain.
To show how stories can affect colonialism, we will be looking at British authors during the time of colonialism. During this period of British colonialism, writers like Joyce Cary, author of “Mister Johnson” wrote novels about Africa and more specifically, a Nigerian named Johnson. Johnson in this novel is represented as “[an] infuriating principal character”. In Mr. Cary’s novel he demeans the people of Africa with hatred and mockery, even describing them as “unhuman, like twisted bags of lard, or burst bladders”. Even though Cary’s novel displayed large amounts of racism and bigotry, it received even larger amounts of praise, even from Time Magazine in October 20, 1952. The ability to write a hateful novel and still receive praise for it is what Chinua Achebe likes to describe as “absolute power over narrative [and...
ethic. He overcame his legal matters, and survived through the persecution of his religion, he still managed to accomplish more than any boxer, and a majority of any athletes. Though it was just self-proclaimed confidence, he turned out to be just what he told the world, “The Greatest”