Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantage of spyware
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantage of spyware
Is the use of spyware harmful or useful? In Harlan Coben’s article,“The Undercover Parent”, the article states that spyware will assist you in watching over or monitoring your child as he/she browses the internet making it easy to know if something is wrong with your child. However, I disagree with Harlan Coben’s argument that parents should consider using spyware as protection for their teens on the internet; it breaks trust between parent and child, it prevents the child from making their own decision, and spyware is not very effective. To begin with spyware is not as effective as you would think. First off, you cannot monitor your child all day long. “There was a girl who was cyberbullied to the point where she committed suicide.” Also, …show more content…
This will be a bother to your child’s growth and will be an inconvenience to him/her. This is important to your child for he or she will not know the dangers of the internet and the world.. Spyware can make your child indecisive about things or maybe he cannot even make his own decision. My final point is that spyware can break the trust between a parent and a child. If the child were to find out about spyware on their devices that could break the trust between the parents and child. The child will become aware that the parents do not trust their own child on the internet so the trust between them would disappear or be damaged. No parent would like the trust between their child and them to be broken or damaged. It is important to be able to see what my child does on the internet so that I will know if something dangerous or bad is happening to him. If we do not see everything that our child does on that machine then we might not know if something bad has happened to our child. Everyone needs their privacy, as well as those children. Parents should understand that this can break the trust of their children. It is true that we need to be able to have a watchful eye on our children, however we do not need to watch them 24 hours a
Internet is advancing every day, parents have no idea what their kids are doing in cyberspace and are contemplating the idea of spyware. In the article, “The Undercover Parent” by Harlan Coben, he argues the idea of parents putting spyware on kids’ computer is a good idea to keep the child safe. Many American parents have no idea what happens in cyberspace; sex, bullying, and drugs. Parents are torn between protecting their child with spyware and allowing the child to have privacy. Coben uses his friends’ personal experiences to support his argument without leaving room for counterarguments. By using strong emotional appeals, weak qualifiers, and sugary word choice Coben creates a weak argument that lacks persuasion.
Harlan Coben’s essay “The Undercover Parent” attempts to enlighten readers, specifically parents, of the benefits to installing spyware onto their children’s computers in order to keep record of their child’s online activity. Whilst admitting at first he was not particularly keen on spyware himself, Coben aims to persuade his audience of the benefits by highlighting the dangers of children using the internet unsupervised and without boundaries. However, Coben fails to supply factual evidence to back up his claims, all while stating a number of contradictions within his own arguments.
The expansion of the Internet infrastructure across the world, has brought an increased audience. Which has provided expanded markets for businesses and exploited new opportunities. There are virtually countless social sites and media used by individuals to access and share experiences , content, insights, and perspectives. Parents today tend to believe they should spy on their kids online activity. I argue parents should respect the privacy of a child's social life and his/her internet activity.
Kids now want to be more independent and have more freedom which might scare some if not most parents. A lot of parents look at the internet as a dangerous tool and not a tool where their kids can have some freedom. Although parents need to realize that they can’t protect their kids from all ...
Online predators, pornography, drug trafficking, piracy, and hate sites are just some of the dangers that a child can face on the internet. The article “The Undercover Parent” by Harlan Coben states that parents should use spyware to monitor their children. Coben argues that parents should be able to know what is in their children’s lives. he believes that spyware can prevent children from being targeted by internet predators on social networking sites and even prevent children from being cyber bullied. I agree with Coben’s claim that parents should consider using spyware as a protection for their teens online. There are many possible dangers facing children on the internet and it is essential that parents install spyware.
...child myself, I wouldn’t want to provide the tools which enable my friend to do so. I believe that people have a perfect duty not to spy on one another. As someone with a reasonable technical knowledge, I would inform the parent that there are other ways of controlling their child’s computer and phone usage without directly monitoring them and reading their conversations. For example, the parent could instead opt to block access to adult websites from the router, restrict functions such as video chat or picture messaging, and limit the amount of time a child can spend on their devices without viewing each and every individual thing that the child does. This way the child will understand what is expected of them with regards to their electronic device usage without feeling that their every move is being monitored and that their private conversations are being read.
First, parents should not use spyware to monitor their children. Parents possessing too much personal information about their kids can create problems. For example, in my personal experience, parents tend to gossip about their kids social lives. Sometimes they even tell other kids. No one likes rumors, and they usually don't end well. While others may argue that spyware is the only way to truly
The computer can be a very good tool to all ages if you monitor your kid and block certain website that you would not like him or anyone in your family to see. So if you as a parent have good tech skills, you can give your kid them aswell while keeping him safe on the
I believe that putting spyware on your teenagers or child's computer can be a good thing as long as you are doing it to be protective, making sure they only talk to good people, and telling them that you have the spyware on the computer. Parents of teenagers want to make sure you are not being nosy and only finding out information that is not good to your children. The parental responsibility is to be protective and not to be invading the privacy of your children. The first reason on why spyware can be a good thing is because you are protecting your children.
Harlan Coben’s suggestion of spyware has a bunch of advantages and disadvantages. Some parents need to use it, some parents don’t. He claims a lot of positive effects about Spyware, but I do not agree with the most of it. Spyware does help in a lot of ways. It might help us reduce the cases for drugs and cyber-bullying and as well as protecting our personal information, but it’s also our job to avoid sharing our information to strangers online and thinking about our decisions twice. However, whatever precautions we do to avoid the dangers of these kind of situations, the Internet would always be a dangerous place for
However, sensitive information that may be shared might later embarrass the children as they grow older and realize what is available on the internet. Such events may result in resentment and misunderstandings on both the children and the parents’ sides. According to Steinberg (2017) in “Sharenting: Children’s Privacy in the Age of Social Media,” there have been long-term issues and conflicts regarding parental sharing and whether children have the right to control what is shared about them. Another long-term problem raised by parental sharing is the idea of data collecting. Per “Children’s Privacy in the Big Data Era: Research Opportunities,” “These trends raise serious concerns about digital dossiers that could follow young people into adulthood, affecting their access to education, employment, healthcare, and financial services. Although US privacy law provides some safeguards for children younger than 13 years old online, adolescents are afforded no such protections” (Montgomery, Chester, & Milosevic, 2017, p.
There are programs available to those parents who feel it is necessary to monitor their childs use of the Internet. Cybersitter can be purchased for around $39.95, and can help to regulate your web browser keeping your childs access to the world wide web restricted. There is even and option in which incoming and outgoing e-mails for inappropriate material.
Also the fact that you can choose what your children see on the internet, so you can ban websites that will influence them to do things you do not want them to do and protect them from rapists, murderers, and other dangerous predators. The disadvantages are you destroying any trust your children have on you, making your children have trust issues, and being so sheltered that when you are no longer there they do not know what to do and how to stand up for themselves. I disagree with the use of these products, because they will completely destroy any children self-esteem. They will start to question why their parents would not trust them and constantly having to check themselves to not say any wrong things. Over time, the children will withdraw themselves and stop trusting their parents with anything, because if their parents do not trust them why should they. They will grow up to be better liars than anyone else from constantly having to hide things and be more experimental to see what could be so bad. Overall, it will corrupt all the family
These individuals feel that it is an invasion of the teenagers’ right to privacy and the development of their trustworthiness. Kay Mathieson states “only by giving children privacy will they come to see their thoughts as something that belongs to them – to which they have an exclusive right.” In the United States and according to the law, monitoring the internet usage of a minor does not break any laws and is a moral obligation of the parent. Trustworthiness is an important development of a child to learn in order to develop genuine relationships with others in the lifetime. “Not only does monitoring have the great potential to undermine the trust of the child in the parent, and thus to undermine trust in others more generally, it also has the potential to undermine the capacity of the child to be worth of trust” (Mathieson). If the parent has not already had conversations with the teenager about monitoring internet usage and the parent is not telling the child about the monitoring, there is already an issue with the development of trustworthiness in the teenager. There was already a failure of development of this skill before the internet or internet monitoring was introduced.
With the availability of smartphones, children are becoming familiar with them at a very early age. This leads parents to feel like they can cause their children to have social problems by using the devices too much or to be harassed for not using smart devices. This leaves some parents in between a rock and a hard place. (Craig)