Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Project on game theory
Applying game theory in an essay
Game theory essay case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Project on game theory
Ever since you were a child you have unknowingly used game theory. When your parents gave you the option to choose a candy bar, your brain started thinking of all the possibilities that depended on which candy you chose. You would think which one would taste better, make your feel better, and maybe be healthier for you. In the end, you would narrow your choices down to one piece of candy and eat it happily. Game theory is the use of theory to think through all of the positive and negative possibilities that could happen in a problem and try to maximize the positive. Game theory is not just one theory, throughout the years is has spread into six main games. These games are: zero sum games, non-zero sum games, simultaneous move games, sequential move games, one-shot games, and repeated games. Each of these games will be covered more in depth in this essay, with the exception of zero-sum games. Dalton will be writing about the zero-sum game in his essay.
History is a very important key when trying to figure out what exactly game theory is. Game theory was officially discovered by John Von Nueman and Oskar Morgenstern in 1944. Although those two brilliant men are credited with the discovery, game theory was being used centuries before it was written down. In 500 A.D, the Talmud used the idea of game theory when giving a problem about the different ways to distribute a mans estate to his three wives. Many other well know people used game theory before it was officially recognized. For example, Socrates found that Plato used game theory in two of his works, those works that Socrates spoke about are called “Laches” and “Symposium”. Hemán Cortés, a Spanish explorer, destroyed all of his ships when conquering a new land to make sure t...
... middle of paper ...
...not ratting each other out. Which will result in the two prisoners trusting each other and then understanding that they need to keep quiet. In the end the repeated game is trying the game many times and finding the right pattern to complete the game.
Game theory is the use of thinking through all the positive and negative outcomes of a situation. People everyday use game theory to help solve problems and make decisions. Those who work in business use game theory to help make important decisions about furthering their market and beating the competition. Also, people do not just use game theory, they use the six different branches of game theory. Those branches are: zero sum games, non-zero sum games, simultaneous move games, sequential move games, one-shot games, and repeated games. Overall, game theory is a very interesting and helpful math technique to know.
As the reader follows the novel and reads deeper into the book, they find that the conflict is person vs. person, or the game itself, with the heirs trying to win the game. In the beginning, the heirs of Sam Westing started playing the Westing Game, and all the players, or heirs, got paired up with their partners that they would have for the rest of the game (38). With Turtle as the protagonist, she has the same predicament as all
The game of poker is a card based game, which has developed into many various kinds, in terms of the number of cards dealt, how many cards are on the deck visible for all players, and what remains hidden, over the past few decades. Despite its differences, poker of any kind shares one major significance; the factor, that either sets one winning or losing, is based upon decisions made in the long run. The utmost degree of such decisions resemble economic components, since the most elementary acts, such as raising the bets and folding one’s cards, may be regarded as a case of supply and demand. And one of them, which is the topic of this essay, is Nash Equilibrium, commonly used in games with no more than two players involved which is also known as „Heads Up“. Nash Equilibrium sets two players, with the very same count of chips, against one another in a situation where each player can either bet, all of his or her stack only, or fold. After this particular match is finished, the players‘ stacks are equilibrated again and this whole process is being repeated for sake of the long run. This algorithm is also known as „Fictitious Play“ (Dudziak, 2006). Most importantly each of the players ought to take in consideration the opponent’s decision, based on which they reach a convenient consensus, meaning, in order to maintain Nash Equilibrium, they both must correctly presume the upcoming action (Osborne & Rubinstein, 1994). Thus it is foreseeable that one or the other side, oftenly, faces a difficulty while striving for an equilibrium.
In the completion of this computer tournament, Tit for Tat achieved the highest score against all other strategies and was proven to be the better strategy in the prisoners dilemma. According to Axelrod, there were four properties that will make a strategy successful. The first being the ability to cooperate as long as the opponent was willing to cooperate and this is turn would avoid unnecessary conflicts. The second being provocation by defecting once the other opponent has defected. Thirdly, forgiveness, whereas the player was able to revert back to cooperation after being provoking to their opponent. Lastly, allowing for the players strategies to be clearly understood to allow for the other player to recognize their plans and course of action as to adapt to this pattern. Other factors making Tit for Tat so successful was it was robust, thus having strength to beat all strategies that it came up against. Tit for Tat also had stability whereas it could not be invaded by any other strategies. Also Tit for Tat was viable in that it worked successfully amongst all other strategies. All other program strategies that did not possess these properties were unsuccessful.
Richard Connells “The Most Dangerous Game” is a short story which illustrates that calm analytical thinking can increase your odds of survival and controlling panic.
Hypothesis 1 of the experiment states that Proposers are more likely to make unfair offers in the gain frame condition of the Ultimatum game as opposed to the loss frame condition. This Hypothesis is supported by the existing data which shows that 51 offers were made in the gain frame, as opposed to 28 in the loss frame; this reinforces Hypothesis 1 as it shows a statistically significant difference in offers between the gain and loss frames. This statistical difference creates a link between the data and Hypothesis 1 which, in turn, rejects the null hypothesis as proven by the p value of 0.009. In addition, Hypothesis 2 states that acceptors will be more likely to accept very unfair offers in the loss frame condition than in the gain frame condition. This hypothesis is supported by the evidence recorded from the Ultimatum game as 24 very unfair offers were accepted in the loss frame as opposed to 14 very unfair offers being accepted in the gain frame. This link between Hypothesis 2 and the recorded data, also rejects the null hypothesis as reinforced by the p value of .026. In contrast, Hypothesis 3 is statistically insignificant due the higher value of p. This higher value provides greater room for error and rejects the link between the data and the Hypothesis.
The Lords of War Simulation is best described by the neo-liberalist theory. Neo-liberalism best describes this game because it supports the ideology that everything humans do is in their own self interest. The theory also believes that people only cooperate with each other out of fear; actions of people playing Lords of War validate this theory. To succeed, neo-liberals need cooperation, institutions to mediate, as well as a fear of being defected on. Neo- liberals do not feel that humans are good in nature, but will argue that they have the capacity to bond together for the greater good, for their own personal benefit.
D’Agostino concludes that formalism interpreted through the dichotomization thesis does not provide a satisfactory account of games (p. 12). These specific examples even further support this conclusion by identifying regulative rules that do in fact have a role in defining a game.
The non cooperative game theory comes when different members of decentralized supply chain take the operational decision for their own benefit by observing the action of other players. So in this way each player observes the action of other player and selects the best action from a given set of strategies to optimize his profit and cost.
In other words our perception of things is our reality and reality is subjective. This theory also states that with what one individual would call a rational strategy there may be a negative or unwanted outcome. Not all people reach the same goals by the same methods or processes. When coming up with a plan we consider our upcoming actions with decreased knowledge, different mindsets, and reasoning abilities that are not the same as others.
Gershenfeld, Alan. “Mind Games.” Scientific American 310.2 (2014): 54-59. Academic Search Complete. Web. 9 Apr. 2014.
Game Theory deals with two or more decision makers who are called players, who compete as opponents against one another. In game theory, the players select a strategy without any prior knowledge of the other player’s strategy. Siliconfareast.com defines game theory as “a concept that deals with the formulation of the correct strategy that will enable an individual or entity, when confronted by a complex challenge, to succeed in addressing that challenge.”
Would you like to play a game? This game involves passion, deceit, lies, and love. I viewed two movies that share the same painful theme; Cruel Intentions and Dangerous Liaisons. They both bring to life a set of characters that play with emotions like they are nothing but a mere child's game.
Risky play is an important part of children’s play and children have shown a natural desire of outdoor risky play in the early years of ages (Brussoni, Olsen, Pike & Sleet, 2012). Risky play refers to play that allows children to feel excited and may lead to physical injury (Sandseter, 2007). In the video Adventurous play-Developing a culture of risky play, the interviewer Neville had discussed risky play with five educators. By consulting from this video, this report will provide rationales which are for creating opportunities for risky play in the child care centres, explain how to achieve the outcomes of the Early Years Learning Framework through planning for risky play. It then attempts to analyse the observational learning in Bandura’s
In 1978 John was awarded the John Von Neumann Theory Prize for his invention of non-cooperative equilibria, now called Nash equilibria.In 1994 he received the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel as a result of his game theory work as a Princeton graduate student.Between 1945 and 1996, Nash published 23 scientific studies. Nash also created two popular games: Hex, in 1942 with Piet Hein; and So Long Sucker, in 1964 with M. Hausner and Lloyd S. Shapley. Both games demonstrate what Nash worked on for years: the concept that in a game, one must win and everyone else must lose.
...ly makes for fresh conversation among inmates, at the same time truly violent acts remind the prisoners of the harsh realities of prison life.