Freezing Point Depression Lab

748 Words2 Pages

Freezing point depression: First, the freezing point depression of magnesium chloride was found. To begin, an ice bath was created in a 600 mL beaker filled with ice provided in the laboratory and rock salt. Next, Four different solutions with concentrations of 0.0 g (control), 0.2 g, 0.4 g, and 0.6g of magnesium chloride and 15 mL of deionized water were created. Each solution was made in a 100 mL beaker. The solutions containing magnesium chloride were stirred with a glass rod until the salt was completely dissolved. All equipment was cleaned with deionized water to minimize cross contamination. To calculate the freezing point, a Vernier temperature probe provided in the laboratory was used. The temperature probe was plugged into the GoLink! …show more content…

The temperature probe was placed into the test tube and recorded the temperature of the freezing solution using Logger Pro software. The test tube was held against the inner glass of the ice bath beaker so the test tube was visible to see when the solution froze over. Once the freezing point was measured, the temperature stopped being monitored and the data was recorded. The steps mentioned above for finding the freezing point, also known as ΔTf, was replicated for the 0.0, 0.4, and 0.6 concentrations. To find the freezing point depression, the equation ΔTf = imKf was used. The molality (m) of each solution was then calculated dividing moles of solute by kilograms of solvent, and the Kf value for magnesium chloride is known to be -1.86. Since magnesium chloride breaks down into three ions in deionized water, it was concluded that the Van’t Hoff factor couldn’t exceed three. For better accuracy, the experiment explained above for finding the freezing point depression and Van’t Hoff factor was re-conducted exactly the same to determine more accurate results. Again, the molality of each solution was calculated, and a graph expressing the change in freezing temperature verses molality …show more content…

First, a calorimeter was constructed with three standard styrofoam cups. One cup was stacked within the second for insulation, while the third cup was cut in half to be used as a lid. The lid was made to increase accuracy when recording the temperature. The temperature probe hooked up to Logger Pro software poked a hole in the top of the calorimeter by applied force with the end of the probe through the Styrofoam. Meanwhile, 40mL of deionized water were measured out in two clean 50 mL graduated cylinders, and poured into 100 mL beakers. The beakers and graduated cylinders were cleaned with deionized water to avoid contamination that may cause error. One of the beakers was placed onto a hot plate, which was used to heat the water in the beaker. The other beaker rested at room temperature. Once heated and at room temperature, the initial temperature was measured with the probe. Next, the two 40 mL of deionized water were poured into the calorimeter, quickly sealed with the lid, and the temperature probe emerged through the top of the calorimeter into the water to measure the temperature so the calorimeter constant would be determined. The equations used to determine the calorimeter constant were Δq = mCΔT and Δq =

Open Document