Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of free speech in universities
Political correctness and freedom of speech
Chapter6 the right to freedom of speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of free speech in universities
In Camille Paglia’s essay “Free Speech and the Modern Campus”, Paglia discusses her views on free speech on college campuses and how she believes that the idea of free speech has changed over time. The essay was published back in May of 2016 on the website SmartSet. Paglia talks about the current controversies regarding free speech on campus and how it is the second wave that erupted while she has been teaching college. Along with her many details that she lays out in her essay, she also gives many examples of the violation of free speech rights. She gives her reasoning for why the problem of free speech has returned and who there is to blame for the outbreak. In her essay, Paglia goes into deep detail on how bad the current situation is and how she believes it can be fixed. …show more content…
She gives an example comparing political correctness and past revolutions by stating, “This is the phrase of political correctness...the rebels begin to fight…[and] the victorious survivor then rules like the tyrants who were toppled in the first place.” (Paglia 1). She also gives another example of free speech violation by telling the story of a Italian student named Mario Savio, who she met while attending the University of California at Berkeley. He was the leader of the Berkeley protests, and he was protesting because he was physically attacked for trying to raise money for the Civil rights movement. She then said that Mario conducted a very fiery speech on the steps of Sproul Hall, where he blamed the University's administration. Many of the protesters were arrested as a result of the speeches
...rustrating and a painful one and leaves scars that very few teachers can understand. The problems then combine when the black students have to read this story aloud in class. This experience can really scar a black student and they can never recover. Other students are not asked to go through such embarrassment and humiliation. Even joking or tongue in cheek remarks about the history of their people are extremely poorly received by many black students. “Where rights conflict, one must sometimes supersede the other. Freedom of speech does not, for example, allow words to be deliberately used in a way that would cause someone to suffer a heart attack. By the same token, the use of words in ways that cause psychological and emotional damage is an unacceptable exercise of free speech” (Gilliam 119). She is saying this because she is protecting the rights of students.
Rhetorical situations make part of this speech to influence the audience. Repetition will make it possible for everyone to remember an important fact like the repetitive words “It is a violation”, the reason of why she uses negative words is to make people realize there is a problem that needs to be fixed. The audience already know the good things, what they want to know is the bad things that need a solution. What can be done to improve the world?
In the world today, Freedom of Speech is taken to a different level than what one may imply verbally. With social media, political debates, and the outpour of sexual orientation the First Amendment is exercised in its full capacity. Protecting Freedom of Expression on the campus is an article written by Derek Bok expressing his concerns regarding the display of a confederate flag hung from a window on the campus of Harvard University. The Confederate flag to some is a symbol of slavery and to others it is a symbol of war, or perhaps known as the “Battle Flag”. In this paper one will review Bok’s opinion of the First Amendment, clarity of free speech in private versus public institutions and the actions behind the importance of ignoring or prohibiting such communications according to the First Amendment.
Wheeler, David R. "Do Students Still Have Free Speech in School?" The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 07 Apr. 2014. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.
Hall, K. (2002, September 13). Free speech on public college campuses overview. Retrieved from http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/free-speech-on-public-college-campuses
In his article, “Feigning Free Speech on Campus,” attorney, Greg Lukianoff wrongly claims that colleges are depriving students of their constitutional right to free speech by enforcing speech codes. By focusing on constitutional rights, Lukianoff overlooks the danger of intolerance.
College campuses have always been the sites where students can express their opinions without fear. There have been many debates about the merits of allowing free speech on campus. Some students and faculties support allowing free speech on campus, while others believe that colleges should restrict free speech to make the college’s environment safer for every student. Free speeches are endangered on college campuses because of trigger warning, increasing policing of free speech, and the hypersensitivity of college students.
No matter how controversial an idea, people still have the right to express their opinions. In the end, students should be able to express their ideas no matter how foul it is, and it is the students’ responsibility to express their opinions
If only using one word to represent the United States, “freedom” will be the best answer ever. Due to the protection of the First Amendment, free speech has long been an indispensable part of American people's daily lives. However, there have been lots of arguments when free speech come into campuses. For example, the First Amendment protects all kinds of speech, so students have their right to express themselves even if they are doing hate speeches; nevertheless, if hate speeches do injury some other students, it becomes a very serious problem to not keep the institution peaceful anymore. Just like most people say “school is a miniature of society”, reasonably dealing with the issue of hate speech on campus will be more effective in nurturing
The Constitution basically provides freedom of speech. Humans long for this right to express themselves freely. Just this past year, numerous incidents occurred at universities, where, based on the current events of that time, some student-led protests turned ugly. Violence and hate flowed out of the demonstrators, and colleges acted by responding with punitive measures against students. As a result, controversies arose among a variety of groups with people defending free speech, and others attacking it.
On February 2, 2017, the University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley) canceled an appearance by commentator Milo Yiannopoulos after protests over his views about minorities turned violent. One month later, Charles Murray, co-author of the controversial book The Bell Curve, was shouted down by students during a speech at Middlebury College. Accusing Murray of promoting racist views, the students objected to his speaking on campus. In 2016 and early 2017, other speeches were disrupted or canceled amid student protests. This happened at UC Davis, Brown University, New York University, and DePaul University, among others.
Freedom of speech cannot be considered an absolute freedom, and even society and the legal system recognize the boundaries or general situations where the speech should not be protected. Along with rights comes civil responsib...
“Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so, too,” said by Voltaire, a French Enlightenment philosopher. This idea later influenced the First Amendment of the Declaration of Independence, which lists the five freedoms granted to citizens. One of them being freedom of speech is a fundamental component of a living and breathing democracy. With the recent issues regarding free speech, many have called into question whether or not it is a truly beneficial freedom. First and foremost, writers and artists that take advantage of free speech must be ones to consider the consequences from the varying levels of offense that can be evoked in an audience.
Factors that hold relevance to speech on public college campuses include whether the speech takes place on the campus itself, what specifically is being spoken or demonstrated, is the speech directed to someone or a group specifically or is the speech broad, at what point has the speech turned to action, is the speech considered hate speech, violent, disruptive, or threatening to any reasonable individuals’ ideals? These are just a few factors which must be asked when dealing with speech on public college campuses. For instance: suppose an individual is on the University of Arizona’s campus and they are preaching about a contested subject. Many of the factors listed above will be used in determining whether the speech is constitutionally upheld by the First Amendment or if the speech is deemed unconstitutional and in violation of the University’s policy.
Freedom of speech is the right given to every individual. Everyone has been given the right to speak their mind and share their opinions. This right is always important but in higher learning, it is essential. Without freedom of speech the whole idea of higher education would just be a contradiction. When an institute of higher education tries to resist this right the whole purpose of the institute becomes contradicted. One needs their right to freely speak their mind for higher education to be a successful venture. The right to free speech is essential in higher education because it gives the individual the chance to fearlessly be who they are, the mind substance to develop and, the opportunity to bring better ideas about.