Fred's Cocoamone Summary

438 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Animal welfare report essay

2. In the article it presented a story of a man named Fred. Tragically he was in an accident, which caused him to damage him cocoamone. The cocoamone is a hormone that is responsible for the experience of chocolate. Fred absolute loved chocolate and got joy out of eating it before his accident. However, after the accident the chocolate offered nothing to him, it was simply bland. Fred wanted more than anything to experience the pleasure he once had for chocolate again so he set out and found a solution. He learned that severely abused puppies can produce cocoamone even though they don’t usually. Unfortunately, there was no way for Fred to just go out a buy cocoamone from puppies at Walmart or another grocery store. Which caused him start his …show more content…

A few differences between Fred and factory raised meat eaters is that Fred abuses and kills the puppies himself while most of the factory raised meat eaters purchase their meat that has been abused and killed by others. Another difference is the factory raised meat eaters are often unaware of the torture that animals go through, since most of the eater purchase their meat at grocery stores where it is cleanly wrapped. Fred on the other hand, sees and gives the torture, he knows the pain and sadness suffered by the puppies, and still chooses to consume their cocoamone. The article also gave a view of a factory raised meat eater. They think that their actions are completely different from Fred’s. They think that if Fred stopped killing puppies for their cocoamone he would save many lives. On the other hand, they the factory raised meat eaters thinks that if one person alone stopped buying and eating meat, no animal would be saved. This is because to them meat factory business are too large to be affected by one person. Therefore, they might as well enjoy the animals even though their enjoyment does not justify the suffering the animals went

Show More
Related

  • More Pros Than Cons In A Meat-Free Life Analysis

    125 Words  | 1 Pages

    The argumentative article “More Pros than Cons in a Meat-Free Life” authored by Marjorie Lee Garretson was published in the student newspaper of the University of Mississippi in April 2010. In Garretson’s article, she said that a vegetarian lifestyle is the healthy life choice and how many people don’t know how the environment is affected by their eating habits. She argues how the animal factory farms mistreat the animals in an inhumane way in order to be sources of food. Although, she did not really achieve the aim she wants it for this article, she did not do a good job in trying to convince most of the readers to become vegetarian because of her writing style and the lack of information of vegetarian

    Read More

  • Eating Animals by Jonathan Safran Foer

    1044 Words  | 3 Pages

    American consumers think of voting as something to be done in a booth when election season comes around. In fact, voting happens with every swipe of a credit card in a supermarket, and with every drive-through window order. Every bite taken in the United States has repercussions that are socially, politically, economically, and morally based. How food is produced and where it comes from is so much more complicated than the picture of the pastured cow on the packaging seen when placing a vote. So what happens when parents are forced to make a vote for their children each and every meal? This is the dilemma that Jonathan Safran Foer is faced with, and what prompted his novel, Eating Animals. Perhaps one of the core issues explored is the American factory farm. Although it is said that factory farms are the best way to produce a large amount of food at an affordable price, I agree with Foer that government subsidized factory farms use taxpayer dollars to exploit animals to feed citizens meat produced in a way that is unsustainable, unhealthy, immoral, and wasteful. Foer also argues for vegetarianism and decreased meat consumption overall, however based on the facts it seems more logical to take baby steps such as encouraging people to buy locally grown or at least family farmed meat, rather than from the big dogs. This will encourage the government to reevaluate the way meat is produced. People eat animals, but they should do so responsibly for their own benefit.

    Read More

  • Chad Levin's Article: Factory Farms In A Consumer Society

    1339 Words  | 3 Pages

    Factory farming is a system of livestock that uses intensive methods by which livestock are contained indoors under strictly controlled conditions. In the article, “Factory Farms in a Consumer Society,” Chad Levin explains how farmers began to adopt the term, “factory farms”. In the beginning, farmers were trying to industrialize and create the best factory farm in the United States. Many farmers wanted to succeed with new technology presented, they created faster ways to butcher animals, antibiotics to control the criticism of many that did not believe factory farming was the healthiest way to produce food. Factory farming is preferred over other traditional farming methods because it is an efficient way to produce more meat in a shorter time

    Read More

  • Promoting Veganism to Protect Animals

    1334 Words  | 3 Pages

    Breeding sows are confined in gestation stalls, pigs have their tails cut off without anesthesia, calves are tethered by their necks in veal crates, and egg-laying hens are debeaked and kept in cages too small to spread their wings in; in a factory farm, animals are treated as commodities. This vivid imagery depicts the facts pertaining to animals. The search for solutions has focused on two paths; one reforming the system and instituting more humane standards, and the second promoting veganism so that fewer animals are bred, nurtured, and slaughtered. While few animal activists disagree with promoting veganism, some believe that campaigning for reforms, and humane labeling is counter-productive. Humane standards can either be required by law, or instituted voluntarily by farmers. Farmers who voluntarily agree to higher humane standards are either opposed to factory farming, or are trying to appeal to consumers who prefer meat from humanely raised and slaughtered animals. There is no single definition of “humane meat,” and many animal activists would say that the term is an oxymoron. Different meat producers and organizations have their own humane standards by which they abide. Humane standards might include larger cages, no cages, natural feed, less painful methods of slaughter, or prohibition of practices such as tail docking or debeaking. In some cases, campaigns target retailers or restaurants instead of the actual producers, and pressure the companies to purchase animal products only from producers who raise the animals according to certain voluntary standards. Societies individuality is split by advocates and opponents; is there a fine line between truth and falsehood, or is animal slaughter for diet always inhumane?

    Read More

  • Factory Farmers: America's Very Own Bullies

    3876 Words  | 8 Pages

    “We take care of animals, and the animals take care of us.” (Rollin 212). The preceding phrase is a policy that American farmers in the old west lived their lives by. Modern farmers live do not live their lives anywhere near to this phrase because they own factory farms, and the whole reason for having a factory farm is to fit as many animals in a small space as possible in order to maximize profit. Factory Farms, or Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) first appeared in the 1920s, right after Vitamins A and D, because if animals are given these vitamins in their diets, exercise and sunlight are not necessities for the animals to grow anymore (In Defense of Animals 1). The growing number of factory farms is coupled with the decreasing population of rural areas, which means that many people are beginning to factory farm because it yields a higher profit (“Agricultural Sciences” 170). In the 1950s, the average number of chickens on a given egg farm in the United States was 100, but now the average number is a shocking 10,000 chickens (“Factory Farms” 4). The reason for the increase of chickens has to do with new and cheaper technology developed just after World War II. The new technology increased the number of chickens, while it had the opposite effect on dairy and meat cows, their numbers went in the other direction. The number of cows used for milk was cut by more than half between 1950 and 2000, because farmers discovered new and more efficient methods for milking cows (Weeks 4). Many activists for animals’ rights are concerned about the methods used by factory farmers because they confine their animals into tight spaces and since there are so many of them in a small ...

    Read More

  • Factory Farming in the U.S.

    624 Words  | 2 Pages

    Factory farming has changed drastically over past 6 decades. We often believe that our food comes from a peaceful, happy farm, but in reality farm animals are put through misery on a daily basis. Regardless of whether it is an independent farm or contracted farm, livestock is mistreated and then harvested for meat or dairy production. The way production animals are treated on factory farms should change for the safety of the animals and the people who consume them.

    Read More

  • Kantianism And Utilitarianism

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    After reading the Ethics of What We Eat, one may conclude that there are two normative principles that can be applied when ruling the ethics behind our food (Utilitarianism and Kantianism). Utilitarianism, which focuses on the consequences of actions, emphasizes that actions are right in proportion when they promote happiness and wrong as they tend to reverse it. On the contrary, Kantianism does not concern itself with the consequences in considering what’s right or wrong. Instead, what’s right is not the maximization of happiness, but the morality of the actions that lead to such happiness. Because of these opposite ideologies, using animals for food, its environmental impact, and its impact on global poverty can be controversial.

    Read More

  • Norcross: Torturing Puppies And Eating Meat Summary

    1037 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Norcross agreement, he believes that people should not purchase factory farming meat because it is morally wrong. Norcross supports his beliefs with the use of an argument of analogy between Fred torturing puppies for the pleasure of chocolate and meats from factory farm raised animals.

    Read More

  • Even If You Like Meat Argument Analysis

    302 Words  | 1 Pages

    The purpose of the argument was from an informational appeal coming from Vergan Organization. This Organization basically uses (Ethos) Information using statistics and (logos) by the stance of the argument. Appealing to emotion causes the reader to feel sympathetic for the audience who consumes a great amount of meat. The main focus of this goal is to prevent further slaughter of animals in factory farms and educate the populous on the understand of cruelty with the visualization of images. A chief Counsel, Jonathan Lovvorn implements that “many of the nation's most routine animal farming practices would be illegal if perpetrated against cats and dogs”.“Even If You Like Meat” basically is an unanswered question arising the argument of this

    Read More

  • Alastair Norcross: The Marginal Case

    1872 Words  | 4 Pages

    Fred had gotten into a car accident and damaged his Godiva gland. This gland is responsible for producing the hormone Cocoamone. The damage to his Godiva gland resulted in Fred being unable to taste chocolate. Consuming Cocoamone is the only way Fred could experience the taste of chocolate again. Some research showed that after long periods of torture to puppies, that

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Factory Farming

    1234 Words  | 3 Pages

    If you are what you eat, then you are an abused piglet. In factory farms all over America unspeakable things are done to these animals. They are raised just to die. Their short lives are miserable ones. Not only are factory farms harming the defenseless animals, it is harming the environment as well. The meat from the animals in factory farms is mechanically removed, which means that it is torn from the bone and other parts of the body by a machine. Factory farms even use parts of the body that most people wouldn 't use such as: lips, eyes, tentacles, and anal tracts that are included in sausage and patties (Hurst). The excess meat is then blended up, mixed with different spices, her and added in with the other meat to make a larger profit. Also people have died from food that the factory farms produce. Factory farms should be stopped to save the animals, the environment, and the consumers.

    Read More

  • Korean Dog Eating Tradition

    1186 Words  | 3 Pages

    The strongest argument against the dog meat industry centers on the treatment of the dogs that are often killed by ?beating, strangling, [and] boiling? instead of more humane methods such as electrocution. Unnecessary cruelty against animals is universally considered wrong, and is in many cases illegal, and that is what makes this argument effective. Saletan addresses this argument logically, with the simple fact that in the interest of humane treatment of dogs ?South Korean lawmakers are proposing to legalize, license, and regulate the industry.? This simple fact exposes a fundamental hypocrisy within the opposing viewpoint. Saletan argues that it is the same activists who base their arguments on ending cruelty against dogs who are trying to keep new, more humane methods from being adopted. The activists condemn and deplore cruel ...

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Abusing

    1025 Words  | 3 Pages

    Would you like to try a dog limb with the salad? These are the exact word that I heard from the Korean air hostess when I was first traveling to the USA. I still remember she passed me a wrong serving plate. This incident really affects me a lot because I had never seen meat before in my life. It makes me think about how the meat industry is widely spread and how it is regulated by the governmental agencies. Factory farming is a system of rearing livestock using intensive methods by which poultry, pigs, or cattle are confined indoors under strictly controlled conditions. Today, factory farming dominates the U.S food production to fulfill the excessive demand of the peoples. Most of the factory farms are run by the giant corporations and their

    Read More

  • Essay On Factory Farming

    790 Words  | 2 Pages

    Factory farms have portrayed cruelty to animals in a way that is horrific; unfortunately the public often does not see what really goes on inside these “farms.” In order to understand the conditions present in these factory farms, it must first be examined what the animals in these factory farms are eating. Some of the ingredients commonly used in feeding the animals inside factory farms include the following: animal byproducts, plastic, drugs and chemicals, excessive grains, and meat from members of the same species. (Adams, 2007) These animals are tortured and used for purely slaughter in order to be fed on. Typically large numbers of animals are kept in closed and tight confinements, having only little room to move around, if even that. These confinements can lead to suffocation and death and is not rare. Evidence fr...

    Read More

  • The Environmental Effects Of Eating Meat

    1335 Words  | 3 Pages

    The animals that are raised in factory farms, and the farms are ran just like any other business. According to the article Factory Framing, Misery of Animals, the factory farming industry strives to maximize output while minimizing cost, always at the animal’s expense. “The giant corporations that run most factory farms have found that they can make more money by squeezing as many animals as possible into tiny spaces, even though many of the animals die from disease or infection” (Factory Farming). This is actually quit disgusting that we eat food that walks around in each other’s feces and can attract disease. These animals live a life of abuse, but we sit back and say it’s okay because we will eventually eat them. “Antibiotics are used to make animals grow faster and to keep them alive in the unsanitary conditions. Research shows that factory farms widespread use of antibiotics can lead to antibiotic-resistant bacteria that threatens human health” (Factory Farming). These animals aren’t treated with proper care and we act as if they are machines. Chickens for example, become so big and distorted that their legs can longer support them. Eventually they die because they can longer walk to get food or water. According to Factory Farming, most of these animals have been genetically manipulated to grow larger and to produce more eggs and milk than they naturally

    Read More

More about Fred's Cocoamone Summary

Open Document