Flaws Of Creationism

273 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Creationism vs evolution argument

Creationist science is a branch of Creationism, which believes that the world was created and designed by the biblical God of Genesis. They believe that “the days of Genesis ought to be taken literally as seven 24 hour days, and that the theory of evolution by natural selection, and the big bang theory, are [fundamentally] incompatible with the story of creation” (277). In Creationist science, Creationism is seen as a scientific theory and, biblical scripture is used as textual proof for their claims. One of its many flaws is how it fails to account for the tremendous breadth and depth of phenomena that the evolution theory has been unable to adequately explain. It is an extremely fragile theoretical apparatus when compared to evolution.
In

Show More
Related

  • Evolution Essays - Is Creation Science Really Science?

    1164 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Creation science" fails two important tests of science: it neither makes predictions nor makes claims that can be empirically verified. It simply makes proclamations by faith. Furthermore, creation scientists have yet to offer any scientific evidence that proves the case of creationism; their efforts are almost entirely spent critiquing apparent contradictions within evolution. Finally, the scientific credentials of the creation scientists are what we might charitably describe as suspicious.

    Read More

  • Science V. Religion: The Scopes Monkey Trial

    1401 Words  | 3 Pages

    The theory of Evolution was developed by Charles Darwin throughout his life and published in 1859 in a book called "The Origin of Species." In brief, it states that all living things on earth evolved over time and that natural selection is how they evolve. Natural selection is the process by which entire populations change in response to their environment. It works because those who are better adapted to the environment reproduce at a higher rate than those who are less suited for the environment (Biology, 2001). It is widely accepted that humans evolved from primates. That is why the trial had the nickname of "Monkey Trial". In contrast, the theory of Divine Creation states that the universe was created in seven days by God and that animals have not evolved since. One can see clear differences between these two theories.

    Read More

  • Biblical Creationism vs. Macroevolution

    2336 Words  | 5 Pages

    “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” is the very beginning of the Bible and the world, written in Genesis 1:1. There has been, is currently, and always will be constant debate over where we came from: created by a higher power or slowly adapted over billions of years. According to the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, evolution is defined as “a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations.” In summary, this means that all things today came from something simpler and, due to natural selection, have become more complex over long periods of time. Macroevolution, which will be the focus of the following argument along with Biblical creationism, is the narrowed believe of evolution in the change at the species level while microevolution is change in order to adapt or mutate. Creationism, as defined by the same dictionary, as “the belief that God created all things out of nothing as described in the Bible and that therefore the theory of evolution is incorrect.” This most clearly means that God, as told in the Bible, created everything. Both theories seem miraculous and ridiculous at the same time. The debate is never ending because there never seems to be enough evidence to convince those on one side of the argument to agree with the other. However, if you look at the evidence objectively, there is an abundance of confirmation that points straight toward a God who created everything out of nothing but himself. Due to immense amount of evidence in support, creationism should be the foundation of the scientific community rather than evolution.

    Read More

  • The Absurdity of Scientific Creationism

    2879 Words  | 6 Pages

    We humans have always thought of ourselves as being unique, whether by divine sanction or by a self-established belief in superiority. For some, this understanding is intimately tied to the traditional tenets that have long been held as fact, having only recently been challenged. For modern Christians, the literal interpretation of the Bible=s account of creation has come under attack by the development and widespread acceptance of Darwinian evolution. To some, undermining the credibility of Biblical creation directly calls into question the Bible=s authority on its moral teachings. As Ken Ham, from the WGBH Boston Video Evolution Series: What About God? states, AYwhat it [the Bible] says is what it meansYit relates to the authority of scripture and the gospelsYso, if the Bible got it wrong in astronomyYgeologyYbiologyYthen why should I trust the Bible when it talks about morality and salvation? [i]@ It is no wonder with sentiments like these that the backlash against evolution has been so strong and lasting; nonetheless, it has not been until the last few decades that such a debate has moved from the pulpit to the laboratory. With a more educated and well-informed army of Christians, who believe in creationism, the scientific evidence for evolution has now come under assault. With creationists and intelligent design advocates like Henry M. Morris and Michael J. Behe respectively, the attack on Darwin is no longer argued as religion versus evolution per se, but rather one Alegitimate@ scientific theory against another.

    Read More

  • Katha Pollitt The Matter With Creationism Summary

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    If anyone were to turn on the most recent debates, they would see some sort of unprofessional rhetoric being displayed. Many young children get excited about watching debates for the reason that they will be able to see a fight happen on live television. This is the incorrect way for anyone to see rhetoric. Rhetoric is a professional, humane way to show one's opinions in a safe, academic environment. Many less-known rhetoricians do show the correct way to use rhetoric. The rhetorical tools that Katha Pollitt uses in her essay, “What’s the Matter with Creationism?”, become impactful to convince the reader that what she is saying to be correct without leaving the professional realm of academic writing.

    Read More

  • Creation and Evolution: An Eternal Debate

    1603 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many people have tried to reconcile the differences between creationism and Darwinism but few have succeeded. Any religious debate is seen as a very sensitive subject and the discussion about the foundations of certain religions generally becomes difficult. Darwinism, in relation to religious beliefs can become controversial; some say they can coexist and some say they cannot. Darwinism was not intended to be anti-religious, but religious activist have criticized the belief since On The Origin of Species was published in 1859. Common ground between the two subjects is a very rough place, but it can be achieved. Reconciliation between the subjects has been achieved but few are standing by it because even the compromise is controversial.

    Read More

  • Creationism in Public School Science Class

    932 Words  | 2 Pages

    happen? If not, then why should science teachers teach that life evolved over billions of

    Read More

  • Creationism in Public Schools

    1423 Words  | 3 Pages

    The question as to whether or not creationism should be taught in public schools is a very emotional and complex question. It can be looked at from several different angles, its validity being one of them. Despite the lack of evidence to support the fundamentalist idea of creationism, that in itself is not enough to warrant its exclusion from the curriculum of public schools in the United States. The question is far more involved and complex.

    Read More

  • God VS Science: The Creation Debate

    1728 Words  | 4 Pages

    For hundreds of years, the controversy of how the earth was created has been a hot topic among people of all beliefs. Do you have an opinion about how the earth was created? Hopefully, giving all of the information stated in this paper, you will firmly believe that God created the earth. The Bible says in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth (To, A. God-Centered Approach). Science says that the earth was created by a massive explosion of light and energy, known as the “Big Bang Theory” ("Did God Create the Universe?”). According to the Bible, God made us, we did not make ourselves. According to science, there was a hydrogen atom that steadily grew over many centuries, and man developed. The Bible says

    Read More

  • Katha Pollitt What's The Matter With Creationism Analysis

    987 Words  | 2 Pages

    Katha Pollitt’s What’s the Matter with Creationism? is based on a poll on peoples belief in evolution. She argues that educated people should be more likely to believe in evolution and rants about how ridiculous it is that the percentage of people is the same between college graduates and the rest of America. She does not do a very good job of persuading her intended audience due to her lack of restraint of opinion. She degrades the people who don’t believe in evolution, which funnily enough discredits a few of her resources.

    Read More

  • Evolution VS. Creationism

    1416 Words  | 3 Pages

    For centuries people have believed in Creationism which is the idea that the Earth, its inhabitants, and everything in the universe was created and governed by a supernatural power. According to Branch and Scott, the biggest influence on this idea is the Bible and more specifically the Book of Genesis which presents “creation ex nihilo (“from nothing”), a world flood, [and] a relatively recent inception of the Earth” (27). Branch and Scott are of course referring to the Judeo-Christian biblical creation stories of “Adam and Eve, the Garden of Eden, the Flood and Noah’s Ark” which, in the seventeenth-century Europe, were “generally considered to by literally true” (Park 24). From these stories the idea that except for the “great flood, the Earth and its inhabitants were pretty much the same now a...

    Read More

  • Evolutionists Vs Evolutionist Essay

    662 Words  | 2 Pages

    The clash between evolutionists and creationists seems to be far from its finale. Both sides come up with potent arguments in favor of their positions. Evolutionists stress the absence of factual evidence in favor of God’s existence, point to fossils as a proof of the evolutionary process, and name the Big Bang as the reason of the universe’s appearance and further development. Creationists, in their turn, stress that there are no intermediate links between species in found fossils, consider complexity and diversity of nature to be an indirect evidence of God’s existence, and refer to the second law of thermodynamics to argue against the Big Bang theory. However, none of the sides seem to see that both points of view can not only co-exist, but be successfully combined. Such a combination could explain everything at once.

    Read More

  • Creationism Vs. Evolution

    2871 Words  | 6 Pages

    The findings of the last 50 years both deny the possibility of Darwin's theory and make a very good case for creationism. Creationism is the belief that all of life came into being suddenly, that it still exists in much the same form, and that the earth is much younger than Darwin thought.

    Read More

  • Evolution: Evolution And The Theory Of Evolution

    559 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is a long line of history surrounding evolution. Theories really stated with creationism. According to Donald R. Prothero, leading paleontologist, creationism is the belief that living organisms in the unive...

    Read More

  • Argument Against Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution

    1187 Words  | 3 Pages

    Charles Darwin proposed the theory of evolution to explain the origin, diversity and complexity of life. I will will disprove evolution by showing that natural selection only explains small evolutionary changes, collectively known as microevolution. Natural selection cannot drive large evolutionary changes, macroevolution. I will also show that the primordial soup, in which life supposedly evolved, did not exist.

    Read More

More about Flaws Of Creationism

Open Document