Five Techniques Of Neutralization Essay

666 Words2 Pages

There are five techniques of neutralization, according to Sykes and Matza. They are denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of victim, condemnation of the condemners, and appeal to higher loyalties. Many people can avoid the blame towards themselves and maintain their self-esteem while they are violating the law if they have not told others they had no intent in the criminal activity. These five techniques of neutralization is portrayed by Sykes and Matza that the individuals are used to prior in violating the law to then allow the offender to accept that breaking the law is right. After the crime has been committed, the individual can rationalize, however there is no need to explain it if they would have not commited the crime in …show more content…

In society, being held for your own actions and responsibility has been shifted. In reality, many individuals of today's society tend to not be responsible and it is always someone else's fault. An example of denial of responsibility is the Holocaust, where there were actual soldiers who helped kill the Jews, yet it was Hitler's fault. In this case they are using the beforehand technique and thinking after the fact. Second is denial of injury, which is where offenders claim that no one in reality is hurt by their actions in violating the law. Usually, people who tend to violate the law are less sensitive to the people they have offended and they often treat their victims as objects. Offenders also tend to believe that the victims who have lost their money or has had property damage, they can recover their losses from the insurance company. However, in reality they are wrong because even though their clients pay higher premiums to make up for the costs, the company end up paying for it. An example of denial of injury is in thinking beforehand of a situation in how no one will really get

Open Document