Introduction
The role of directors
The board of directors of a non-profit corporation is responsible for the management of the company. In general terms, this means that the board is responsible for supervising senior staff, providing strategic planning and developing and implementing the company's policy. Board members should be informed of the activities and financial affairs of the company (or at least become). When the company is a charity, the board has a more rigorous due diligence in regard to the protection of assets for charitable purposes.
In fulfilling its mandate to manage the affairs of the company, the board must meet the objects of the company as set out in the letters patent or articles of incorporation and the bylaws of the
…show more content…
They have what is called a "fiduciary duty" to the corporation. This duty is likely "fiduciary" because the obligation to act in the best interests of the company is essentially a duty of loyalty, honesty and good faith. The modern corporate laws governing commercial companies contain a concise statement of the fiduciary duty imposed on directors. Most corporate statutes governing nonprofit corporations do not. The wording of fiduciary duty was developed in common law by Canadian and British courts or has been articulated in the Civil Code.
Can be divided into two broad categories fiduciary duties of directors:
a) the duty of care and
b) the duty of
…show more content…
They can also be held personally liable for breaches of an increasing number of laws that impose them as directors of responsibility (see Chapter 3). The directors are also responsible for offenses they commit themselves, even if committed in the exercise of their responsibilities as directors. Generally, if an administrator commits a crime, the fact that he acted as a director at the time the crime was committed is not an excuse.
The duty of loyalty
(A) The duty of competence or ability in discharging their duties, directors of non-profit corporations must exercise an appropriate degree of competence. In common law, a standard "subjective" applies to directors of nonprofit corporations ctituées under the Act Canada Corporations or a provincial law on incorporation, unless these laws do not specify a standard different. In some provinces, which has been described as an "objective" standard of competence is defined in law. This standard is discussed below. The subjective standard requires an administrator:
... To exercise a degree of skill and diligence that would be equivalent to due diligence that would be expected of an ordinary person in these circumstances, but it did not demonstrate in fulfilling its obligations a degree of competence higher than would be expected of someone with his knowledge and experience rating
The specific obligations in this case would include monitor corporate governance activities and compliance with organization policies, and assess audit committee effectiveness and compliance with regulations
The board of directors is a good mix of people. The team has a vast knowledge about being running companies. They know about raising capital. They know about building a company from scratch. The gap of knowledge would be customer service. Of course, some of them might have a conflict of interest because they have their own company they are running. Ultimately, what team would want is a return on their investment, whether that be money or
ensure the protection of the Company's legitimate business interests, including corporate opportunities, assets and confidential information; and
The corporation’s business is carried out by its management, under the direction of the Board of Directors. The Board, and each committee of the Board, has complete access to management. Also, the Board and committee member’s has access to independent advisors as each considers necessary or appropriate. Mallor, Barnes, Bowers, & Langvardt (2010) state that the Board of Directors also, issues shares, Adopts articles of merger or sha...
This is discussion, I will explain a personal experience of a nonprofit organization’s board. Secondly, I will provide an analysis of what I foresee for the future of a nonprofit governing board of a nonprofit organization. I will explain if I anticipate greater demands for boards and the board members to be more accountable. Finally, I will explain my perspective and defend it with evidence from the field.
What duties do directors owe the corporation which they serve? ( Page 1, 2 and 3 ) 2. Were the directors exert enough effort to make the company meets its obligations? ( Page 4 ) 3. Were the directors in this case justified in buying the shares of Green Med?
Corporate gorverance as a system are directed and controlld by companies. Initially, their board of directors should take responsible for the gorverance of companies, which include setting strategic aims of companies , guarantee an effective leadership, supervising the proformance of business management and reporting on it to shareholders. The board's action should comply with the law, regulations and shareholders. In addition, the shareholders also play an important role in gorverance and they have right to decide who can be employed as the companies' directors and auditors to provide good governance structure for them. Therefore, corporate goverance can be regarded as what the board of a company does and how it sets the values of the company.
As a consequence of the separate legal entity and limited liability doctrines within the UK’s unitary based system, company law had to develop responses to the ‘agency costs’ that arose. The central response is directors’ duties; these are owed by the directors to the company and operate as a counterbalance to the vast scope of powers given to the board. The benefit of the unitary board system is reflected in the efficiency gains it brings, however the disadvantage is clear, the directors may act to further their own interests to the detriment of the company. It is evident within executive remuneration that directors are placed in a stark conflict of interest position in that they may disproportionately reward themselves. The counterbalance to this concern is S175 Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) this acts to prevent certain conflicts arising and punishes directors who find themselves in this position. Furthermore, there are specific provisions within the CA 2006 that empower third parties such as shareholders to influence directors’ remuneration.
Many laws have been put into place to make sure corporations act ethically, so they do not harm people or the environment. Corporations have a social responsibility to follow these laws and various other ethical actions; Johnson & Johnson, considered to be one of the most admirable companies according to Fortune, is one company that included their corporate social responsibilities in their code of ethics. Their code of ethics states that executive officers cannot financially benefit from unethical transactions or that their management must be competent and ethical (Code of Business Conduct, 2015). It is important for corporations to act ethically and hold up to their social responsibility, especially within the workplace; ethics are especially
Organizations that only have top management as the board members are more susceptible to accounting malpractices. Members of the board should preferably own shares in the company to ensure diligence when it comes to the interests of the company. Apart from the Board of Governors, there should also be an audit committee in place to oversee the financial dealings of the bank. Members of the board and the audit committee should have basic financial knowledge. Some of the members should also be experts in finances so that they can detect any anomaly that may take place in terms of financial reporting. An overhaul of the regulatory framework is required to empower authorities to intervene immediately, and make improvements. New technology is required. Manual antiquated processes should be eliminated because this causes greater human error and poor
The board of directors has both executive and non executive directors. Executive directors have both executive and board duties to perform while non executive directors have only board responsibilities. Therefore both types of directors vary in the responsibilities and authority they have in the company affairs. Thus the non executive directors devote very little time to company affairs ( only attend board meetings, committee meetings of which they are members or sometimes pay a visit to the company premises for getting knowledge of how things are done).
According to Company Act 1965, director includes any person that occupying the position of a corporation by whatever name called and also includes a person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of a corporation are accustomed to act and an alternate or substitute director. It means the function performed by director is the indicator of a real director rather than his/her title. a director is a trustee or officer of the corporation as stated in Section 4(1) of CA1965 and he/she is liable for the default happen in the corporation due to his/her failure in complying with the Company Act 1965.
1. Corporate Law for Ontario Business (2012). Farah Jamal Karmali 2. Business Dictionary (2010). http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/separate-legal-entity.html
How operate governance essential to ensuring that the actions of a firm 's management are consistent with
According to Carol Padgett (2012, 1), “companies are important part of our daily lives…in today’s economy, we are bound together through a myriad of relationships with companies”. The board of directors remain the highest echelon of management in any company. It is the “group of executive and non-executive directors which forms corporate strategy and is responsible for monitoring performance on the behalf of shareholders” (Padgett, 2012:1). Boards are clearly critical to the operation of companies and they are endowed with substantial power in the statute (Companies Act, 2014). The board is responsible for directing and steering the company. The board accomplishes this by business planning and risk management through proper corporate governance.