Business Analysis: Case Analysis Of Couchsurfing

726 Words2 Pages

1. The team represents three main components the visionary, entrepreneur, and the conception. With all of these parts, the team is well balanced. A strong team can secure the necessary capital, they can reassure investors they will be profitable, and can find a wide range of talent to work for them. The team has a well balanced educational, and experience background for the field.

Fenton knows about traveling, and has core values in place that he wants to accomplish. Fenton is the founder of Couchsurfing. Hoffer is a computer programmer. He was able to write the code and develop the website. He had experience with programming in the past as while. He completed a successful educational nonprofit program. He was also involved in a soccer website. …show more content…

The limited partner only risks what they invested in the business. The downside is if the limited partner becomes active then they could potentially lose personal assets. The S corporation is a more favorable tax option on income. The disadvantage is there is certain requirement that must be met. The LLC is a great option. With this type, the risk is only what is invested unlike sole proprietorship. It is easy to set up, and has tax advantages. The downside is if a corporation wanted to switch to C, it would have to pay additional taxes. I do believe the option they picked is best for them at that time. C has tax advantages. If they started with LLC and later wanted to change, it would cost them. C is a great way to get capital as well.

3. The form Couchsurfing transition to was the B Corporation. A B Corporation allows them to be in a better financial state. With this, they are allowed to accept investments unlike being in a nonprofit. The decision was one of positive and negative reactions. In my opinion money wise, it was a smart decision. They do however lose some of the community feel. There are definitely people within in the Couchsurfing community that disagreed with this decision. I believe the transition was handled …show more content…

Having a team provides a company with a diverse set of skills to work with. A team can be especially helpful to startups dealing with new technology that need a broad range of skills (Longenecker et al. 197). Have a team is all about being well balanced. Espinoza knows about running companies he has been the president of previous businesses. Cohler set the foundation of LinkedIn and was the vice president and general manager. Also as experience working a venture capital company. Teo has knowledge about strategy teams. He had experience infiltrating investments. Tashev has experience working in a venture capital analyst. He is also a partner at an investment firm.

The board of directors is a good mix of people. The team has a vast knowledge about being running companies. They know about raising capital. They know about building a company from scratch. The gap of knowledge would be customer service. Of course, some of them might have a conflict of interest because they have their own company they are running. Ultimately, what team would want is a return on their investment, whether that be money or

More about Business Analysis: Case Analysis Of Couchsurfing

Open Document