Family And Medical Leave Act (WHD)

674 Words2 Pages

The Family and Medical Leave Act was passed by the US Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division in the year 1993. The act, as quoted from the Department of Labor, “entitles eligible employees of covered employers to take unpaid, job-protected leave for specified family and medical reasons.” (WHD) As portrayed by this definition, an employee can only take this leave of absence for particular reasons outlined under the act, and both the employer as well as the employee have to meet certain criteria before the FMLA is actually pertinent to the given situation. Examining the specifications of this piece of legislation, the specific reasons given for an employee to take leave of absence via the FMLA include: the birth, adoption, or placement …show more content…

It was designed to enable employees to create a work/life balance that promoted both “stability and economic security” for US workers and their families. Prior to the passage of this act, employees commonly lost their jobs when they became seriously ill or whenever they needed to take a prolonged absence from work for any other multitude of family and health-related reasons. While the passage of the FMLA was celebrated across the country as a major victory for employee welfare, the act’s passage was also particularly seen as a major victory for enabling women to be successful in the workplace. Pre-FMLA, women routinely lost their jobs when they needed time off of work to have a child or requested an extended leave of absence from work to bond with their new baby; worse yet, this lack of job security even forced some women to endanger their own health by attempting to return to work too soon after childbirth- women across the country were haunted by the knowledge that the longer a leave was requested, the more likely it was that she would either lose her job or face demotion. By these counts, the FMLA has had a monumental impact on increasing both employee well-being and the level of diversity within the American labor force. (Labor Law …show more content…

Over the years, many Americans have pointed out the successes of the act- such as the generally positive impact that the act has had on employee absenteeism, turnover, and morale, that tend to come about with little to no negative impact on the employers themselves. (WHD: Survey Factsheet). Yet, an alternative perspective of the FMLA views the act as unnecessary and believes that the FMLA is actually hindrance upon employers who should be able to set their own policies and agendas on the subject of employee leave. Lastly, some people even tend to argue that the FMLA fails to go far enough into protecting employee well-being. In recent years, an increasing number of Americans have called for a revision of our current FMLA, citing a desire to institute a more comprehensive leave act with expanded employer coverage, looser requirements for employee leave, and even the desire to institute a paid leave system, as opposed to this current unpaid leave system.

Open Document