I do not feel Hijabs should be banned as they are part of some people's religion. It is not fair that people would consider stripping people's religious rights away from them. I think the problem is that people associate the wearing of a hijab with terrorism. Not only is that ignorant but it is also a disrespect to human life and values. Christians wear cross necklaces and no one has ever uttered the words we should ban the wearing the cross; it would cause a riot and complete anarchy. Hijabs have a bad rep because of 9/11, however not everyone who wears a hijab is like that. In the article “Secularism in France” The French President went on to say ” Pupils, who are naturally free to live their faith should nevertheless not arrive in schools, …show more content…
For that reason they might feel threatened and some may become violent; as would anyone. If you were a christian, and someone told you “ Your not aloud to wear a cross or speak of Jesus Christ ” then you would become very angry. If they live in America, France or anywhere in the world with human rights it would also be breaking the law upon their human rights that are stated in the Constitution. The United States is a great nation because of the freedom allowed for its people. The mix of cultures we have here, make up our identity as a nation and country. We do not have our own identity because we are made up of many different cultures. A women should be allowed to wear a hijab peacefully and not be subject to harassment. As long as she is following the rules like any other citizen then her hijab are of no harm to society. People like to associate the hijab with negative ideas. In all reality a hijab isn't a symbol of oppression or terrorism, it is the symbol of Islam in which is a religion of peace. Women don't wear a hijab because they are being forced to, they wear a hijab because they are in submission to their religion which is islam. Since the US is a symbol of freedom than any person should they be red blue or purple or the color of the rainbow and believe that Bigfoot is their god and he exist they should be allowed to wear whatever and believe whatever they
Fatemeh Fakhraie’s essay “Scarfing it Down,” explains how Muslim women suffer because of what they wear. Fakhraie blogs about Muslim women in her website she explains; “Seeing ourselves portrayed in the media in ways that are one-dimensional and misleading." Several people judge Muslim's by their appearance because they assume they're a bad person. The author of this essay wants the reader to know that Muslim women wearing a hijab are not a threat to the world.
The relationship between France and Muslims is one that’s never been that good, which was initially caused by French colonialism in North Africa. France viewed the Muslim/Arab population as an inferior race that was uncivilized. “Those who do not share the French value are not only different but inferior – less evolved, if capable at all of evolution” (Scott 173). France colonizers went to Algeria in an effort to civilize the people, which resulted in the racist treatment of them and the horrific rape and abuse of their women. In addition colonial France saw the veil as dangerous, which at times it could be, because it could transport bombs and weapons to
The documentary “Young, Muslim, and French” brings attention to the islamophobia that is going on in France. In September 2004, the French government passed a law banning religious paraphernalia in schools, especially targeting head scarfs. The government claims this was a way to “end extremism”. The school system believes that there is no place for religion in school, and around the young in their formative years. The veil is an expression of their devotion to Islam, not a symbol of terrorism. Not wearing it contradicts their religion and even jeopardizes their place in heaven, and puts a great amount of stress on Muslim students. Which results in the French education failing to properly teach and support these students. Muslim students are thrown off the education path and often study to become electricians and other technical careers. Girls are forced to choose between practicing their faith and receiving an education.
The author talks about how this was not something that happen overnight, but has been discussed about from a very long time such a 1989. The views of people that the author chooses to look at are Ernest Cheniere, who raised the statement of banning headscarves in public schools in 1994 and Francois Bayrou minister of education in 1994 who saw muslim headscarves as a way of proselytizing. Then Joan Scotts talks about why the timing played into affect, how racism such as colonial legacies were effected, secularism, individualism of the veil, Muslims being looked as threats, how uncivilized Muslim people were, and sexuality. Joan Scotts goes into detail in all the sub topics and shows how does this affect a common Muslim girl that wears a hijab and how does the French government view
The veil illustrates a women’s love for god, their modesty, and to show Muslim identity. The veil itself is not bad and even today is looked as a women’s choice to wear such clothing. The symbolism behind the hijab is very powerful and beautiful to show love for god and self-identity. The hijab gives women power and choice; Although, many women adopted the hijab since they will be treated better in their society. In the article “Reinventing the Veil” by Leila Ahmed, she wrote, “Changing dress sometimes empowered them in relation to their parents… expanded job and marriage possibilities… and ability to move freely in public space.” The idea that women must wear the hijab to be equal to men to demining to women. Some parts of the Islam society look as women differently depending on whether they wear the hijab, but the hijab should only be the woman’s choice and not something women have to wear to be able to walk freely and acquire jobs that men have. The western world looks at this and instantly looks down on the Islam world even when the whole society doesn’t look down on women for their choice on wearing the
I will advance the thesis that the banning on Muslim headscarves in French schools is not justified. By saying that the French ban on Muslim headscarves in public schools is not justified, I mean that, even though this ban was implemented as a means to neutralize public space, in hope of developing autonomy, as well as to protect females’ rights in traditional Muslim communities, the ban actually infringes on a more pressing rights of a person, and thus means that it is not justified as it does more harm than good. I have two reasons for attacking the justification of the ban on Muslim headscarves; first, the children’s autonomy; and second, positive and negative liberty. As mentioned above, my thesis asserting that the ban on Muslim headscarves in French public schools is not justified is heavily dependent on the fact that “banning adults from wearing religious symbols in public institutions an infringement of basic human rights (Gereluk 2005, p.260) ”, in which I will illustrate that the French government’s justifications are actually derived from a mere intolerance of Islam; I will first disprove the justifications provided for this ban and reveal their foundation of intolerance, then I will proceed to prove the that the ban is limiting basic human rights.
Fatemeh Fakhraie’s essay “Scarfing it Down,” explains what Muslim women go through when wearing their hijab. Fakhraie talks about Muslim women in her website she says “Seeing ourselves portrayed in the media in ways that are one-dimensional and misleading." In her essay, she talks about how a teenage girl was killed by her father because she refused to wear a hijab. Many countries have banned the hijab in public places.
"The French and the Hijab." German Marshall Fund Blog. N.p., 8 Apr. 2013. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
International human rights standards protect the rights of persons to be able to choose what they wish to wear, and in particular to be able to manifest their religious belief. Thus, Human Rights Watch in their report, focusing on the hijab ban for state officials in Germany, said that: “Restrictions should only be implemented where fully justified by the state, and be the least restrictive necessary”.1 Proclamation of wearing the hijab in public institutions as illegal is undermining the autonomy of individuals, their right to choose, their right to privacy and intimacy, and their self-determination. In addition to this, several European countries such as Germany and France directly prevent women wearing hijab to work or attend school in the public state institutions, which further intensified already negative attitude of Western public towards wearing hijab.
One’s body is very attractive to the opposite sex and thus it should not be revealed as if it has no value. One should look at a person’s beauty from the inside, the heart, not just from the outside. One should be liked and judged not by what they choose to wear, but by their personality. Hijab is a choice that some women or girls make for their own security, for more privacy, or because it makes them feel comfortable and confident about themselves. It should be a choice though, and as it is not proven to us that it is obligatory, countries such as Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Pakistan should remove their laws that insist every girl puts the veil on.
The headscarf has a role in Islam. It derives its significance from the Qur’an. Qur’an is God’s command to Muslims and the word taught to Prophet Mohammad by Allah. Muslim women wear headscarves to cover themselves. It’s a kind of modesty, and a way that women cover their beauty. They should not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands ‘fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, or their brothers’ sons or their sisters’ sons, or their women or the servants whom their right hand possess, or male servants free of physical needs, or small children who have no senses of the shame of sex and that they should not strike their feet in order to draw attention to their hidden ornaments.
I will explore why I think it should be banned in Britain, as it was in France in 2011. The burqa is the full length covering with a mesh around the eyes through which the woman can see. It is typically worn in countries such as Afghanistan, Syria and Saudi Arabia, enforced by the group in power, in two of these
Davis, Derek H. “Reacting to France’s Ban: headscarves and other Religious Attire in American Public Schools.” Journal of Church and State. Spring 2004. EBSCO. Online. Feb 28 2010.
To begin with, the hijab is uncomfortable and impractical in today's modern society. The hijab causes more problems than it solves. Many people either are scared of someone wearing it or they hate the person wearing it. It is very difficult to
Why should I have to wear a hijab just because I’m told to? Shouldn’t I wear it because it makes me happy and because I want to be proud and showcase my