Examples Of Paradoxes In Romeo And Juliet

932 Words2 Pages

William Shakespeare is really famous for his writings, especially Romeo and Juliet. A pair of two star crossed lovers take place, on their mission to unite two houses, Capulets and Montagues, once and for all. In the play Romeo and Juliet, William Shakespeare presents a lot of paradoxes. This provides a lot of contrast to the text and allows readers to think harder and better understand the intricacies of this writing. In this play, there are many paradoxical themes expressed through the text for example good versus evil, love versus hate, and many more. All these paradoxes are communicated through figurative language, characterization, sound devices, and literary foils. These are literary devices that authors use to help readers to visualize …show more content…

When Friar Lawrence was collecting flowers in his basket he states, “Within the infant rind of this weak flower, poison hath residence and medicine power”(2.3.25). This tells and shows us that there is good and bad in everything of this world, for example the flower contains poison and medicine, and depends on what part of the flower is used. Also it shows that within a weak flower there can be both something great and something harmful. Furthermore, the flower demonstrates that although something might seem little, it may become very dangerous. The same flower that can kill people, can also cure them as well. During Friar Lawrences huge monologue in Act 2, when he was picking flowers, he states, “In man as well as herbs, grace and rude will” (2.3.30-31), here the Friar compares humans to plants and suggests everyone has civility and crudeness in themselves much like plants have the power to help or hurt. In a plant, whichever part of it is used is extremely potent and will spread rapidly. In a human, each person’s good and bad influences spread through his or her actions. Here, Friar Lawrence uses the paradox of medicine versus poison, and good versus bad to draw a comparison between humans and …show more content…

When Nurse comes to tell Juliet what happened to Romeo and Tybalt, Juliet was really surprised. Juliet inquires “When thou didst bower the spirit of a fiend, in mortal paradise of such sweet flesh?”(3.2.87-88), comparing good versus evil drawing attention to the fact that although Romeo’s actions were evil, referring to Romeo killing Tybalt over the murder of Mercutio, his outward appearance remained appealing. Due to Romeo’s grave offense, he is now considered as a “devil”, but his appearance is so beautiful. The theme of opposites show that Juliet is astonished of Romeo’s internal conflict and deceiving external appearances. She continues to wonder, “Was ever book containing such vile matter, so fairly bound?”(3.2.89-90). Juliet is now asking if there was ever a book containing unpleasant things have a beautiful cover, using the metaphor of a bound book comment on her lover. Juliet is really confused in this section because she never thought Romeo would kill someone due to his previously shown solicitous nature. Juliet is trying to reconcile how if anyone is good, they can commit a horrible act, like how Romeo killed Tybalt. The universal truth is that good people do bad things

Open Document