The novel Tu, written by Patricia Grace, is about three brothers that decide for different reasons that they all needed or wanted to go to war. The book is written so that the reader is reading from two view points. There is the first person point of view, which is told through by Tu through journals he kept during the time he was at war. Then there is also the third person point of view which is used to give us background information about Pita and things that happened before he decided to go to war. I believe that Patricia wrote this as an anti-war novel. She shows us the devastating effects that war can have on families, and uses the different perspectives from many characters like the father, Rangi, Pita, and Tu throughout the novel to …show more content…
One way Grace shows that this is an anti-war novel is through the father and the post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that he experiences. The father is badly injured in battle and has to return home. Pita describes that his presence was like “a dead space in the room and in their lives” (page 52). The father would sit in a big armchair in front of the windows, but was not able speak to them. The only thing the father could muster was grunts, but as time went on he was able to regain control over his body and began to speak recognizable words again. Normally this would be a good thing, but with his body control came the violence. “The first time it happened Pita woke in the night to the sound of their father smashing through the house” (page 56). The father began having these outbursts consistently where he would break lamps, pictures, and hurt those trying to make him stop. In Pita’s early years he would always run to get help, but as he and Rangi grew older, they began …show more content…
They talk about their little brother Tu, devise on a plan that will save their little brother from the war. The plan includes hurting Tu, but they agree it will be the best thing for him in the long run. Tu recalls what happened to him, “There’s a blow to the side of my head which can only be from the butt of a swinging rifle. It lays me out. After that there’s a careful removal of clothing and a careful bayonet cutting that is done exactly, sufficiently – an operation which will ensure that for me the war is ended” (page 254). Rangi and Pita knew that there was no way Tu would ever leave the war on his own, so they take it into their hands to make the decision for him. “This is what they chose for me, my brothers, making sure I had injuries enough to send me home or keep me in hospital until it’s all over, making sure I’ll never steady a rifle again” (page 254). This is an important moment in the book because it shows the length that the two older brothers, Rangi and Pita, are willing to go just to get Tu out of combat and away from war. Grace is showing the extreme length that the brothers went to keep Tu safe, and is trying to show people that if Tu was never at war he never would have had these serious injuries inflicted on
This psychological memoir is written from the eyes of Ishmael Beah and it describes his life through the war and through his recovery. War is one of the most horrific things that could ever happen to anyone. Unwilling young boy soldiers, innocent mothers and children are all affected. In most instances, the media or government does not show the horrific parts of war, instead they focus on the good things that happen to make the people happy and not cause political issues. In his book A Long Way Gone, Ishmael Beah dispels the romanticism around war through the loss of childhood innocence, the long road of emotional recovery and the mental and physical effects of war.
about the war and his lack of place in his old society. The war becomes
No one knows what will happen in his or her life whether it is a trivial family dispute or a civil war. Ishmael Beah and Mariatu Kamara are both child victims of war with extremely different life stories. Both of them are authors who have written about their first-hand experience of the truth of the war in order to voice out to the world to be aware of what is happening. Beah wrote A Long Way Gone while Kamara wrote The Bite of the Mango. However, their autobiographies give different information to their readers because of different points of view. Since the overall story of Ishmael Beah includes many psychological and physical aspects of war, his book is more influential and informative to the world than Kamara’s book.
This book is anti-war since it shows how war could advance someone’s life into a huge disaster, how anyone can break down from the stress that others impose on them, just to be able to produce someone who can save humanity, and how someone’s life was controlled by someone else since they were born and can not be able to change and let themselves hold on to their own life, fate, and future. War destroys everything but Ender’s Game shows how war had affected and destroyed Ender’s whole entire
a particular point of view, which is against war. For example, when Vonnegut writes of the ways Billy views.
Another unique aspect to this book is the constant change in point of view. This change in point of view emphasizes the disorder associated with war. At some points during the book, it is a first person point of view, and at other times it changes to an outside third person point of view. In the first chapter of the book, “The Things They Carried,” O’Brien writes, “The things they carried were largely determined by necessity (2).
A turn of events comes about in the story when Gary Hazen and his two sons, Gary David and Kevin, go with him on a hunting trip and Gary accidentally shoots and kills Gary David. After this, he feels so badly about the incident that he shoots himself. Kevin finds his father lying in the woods and saves him from dying. Kevin rethinks his feelings toward his father by realizing all that his father has done for him and taught him which leads him to show grace to his father in this difficult situation. Towards the end of the story, Gary extends grace toward both Kevin and himself. The meaning of The Grace that Keeps This World is that humans need the presence of grace in their lives to keep on living, and this is shown through Bailey’s use of the themes of forgiveness and redemption throughout the novel, which is especially evident in the lives of Kevin and Gary Hazen.
during the war. This novel is able to portray the overwhelming effects and power war has
Many individuals look at soldiers for hope and therefore, add load to them. Those that cannot rationally overcome these difficulties may create Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Tragically, some resort to suicide to get away from their insecurities. Troops, notwithstanding, are not by any means the only ones influenced by wars; relatives likewise encounter mental hardships when their friends and family are sent to war. Timothy Findley precisely depicts the critical impact wars have on people in his novel by showing how after-war characters are not what they were at the beginning.
War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning, written by the talented author Chris Hedges, gives us provoking thoughts that are somewhat painful to read but at the same time are quite personal confessions. Chris Hedges, a talented journalist to say the least, brings nearly 15 years of being a foreign correspondent to this book and subjectively concludes how all of his world experiences tie together. Throughout his book, he unifies themes present in all wars he experienced first hand. The most important themes I was able to draw from this book were, war skews reality, dominates culture, seduces society with its heroic attributes, distorts memory, and supports a cause, and allures us by a constant battle between death and love.
This new perspective makes them realize how lucky they were not to be mortally wounded. Another cause of change in the men besides the battles, results from seeing friends in the hospital. The first display of this sorrow is Kemmerich’s death. He was a good friend to all the men, especially Paul. When the men see him lying in his bed about to die, they feel terrible. Because they feel this way, they tell Kemmerich that he is going to be okay. The hospital scene with Kemmerich dying is meaningful and touching to the readers, because it too shows a change in the men. This change shows the hate and anguish of the battlegrounds, contrasted with compassion towards a close friend who is in need. This scene also lets the reader know how many people received injuries each day. When Paul goes to tell the doctor that Kemmerich The doctors response was that he had already amputated five legs that same day. The reader sees why when one person dies, it really does not mean anything to the doctors, except a free bed. This scene, plus the others which take place in the hospital, shows change in the way that men pull together when someone is in need. The hospital scenes also show that men are so accustomed to death, they know when someone is going to die, and can tell the degree of an injury when it happens. There is a major change in the men in this novel. At first, they are excited to join the army in order to help their country. After they see the truth about war, they learn very important assets of life such as death, destruction, and suffering. These emotions are learned in places like training camp, battles, and deal with death, which is very important to one’s life. & nbsp;
“Every war is everyone’s war”... war will bring out the worst in even the strongest and kindest people. The book tells about how ones greed for something can destroy everything for both people and animals leaving them broken beyond repair, leaving them only with questions… Will they ever see their family again? Will they ever experience what it’s like to
In the beginning of the short story, the young boy is already imprinted with the ideas of war from his father. His father was a former soldier who “had fought against naked savages and followed the flag of his country..” (Bierce 41). The image of war that is imprinted on the young boy from his father is that of nobility and righteous that comes from war.
The first element to why Slaughterhouse-Five is an anti-war novel is because Vonnegut, the character, says it is. In the first chapter the character Vonnegut speaks with Mary O'Hare, the wife of Bernard O'Hare and antagonist of war, regarding the book that he will write and how it views war. Vonnegut also discusses with Mary why the book will be called The Children's Crusade. Mary says, "‘You will pretend you were men instead of babies...’" (14). Mary is accusing Vonnegut of writing the novel and saying that they were prepared for war because she thinks that he will glorify war by disregarding the fact that he and her husband were just young men not ready to fight in a war. She worries he will instead create characters who were heroes of war and show that they were ready to fight. Vonnegut answers, "‘I'll tell you what,’ he said, ‘I'll call it The Children's Crusade’" (15). He uses this as a response to show that he is writing an anti-war novel because he wanted to emphasize that they were not ready to fight in war and that they should not have fought in the war because they were young and unprepared.
A Farewell to Arms is clearly an anti-war novel; the story swifts from naive game playing, through the stages of love and hope, to pure despair and an understanding that a war can lead to no winners. The passionate love story of the novel strengthens the message still more by showing the ironic similarity, but also its discrepancy, with the war. The discrepancy is to be taken into serious account, this discrepancy is the important message of this novel; make love not war.