Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of censorship in schools
The importance of censorship in education
The importance of censorship in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of censorship in schools
“The Miseducation Of Cameron Post” has caused a school district to ban the book due to its major profanity. Though many think freshman students should not read it, many think otherwise. Parents have complained that it’s too “gay” and uses too much words that a freshman shouldn’t know, but they don’t realize that they might have already learned many other “bad” things in today’s world. Maybe some parents should worry about who their children’s friends are, the movies they’re watching, or how easily they can get their hands on that book. In my opinion, I think it's the students choice to read what they want. High school is a time when kids find out who they are and start growing more independently. This is a time where people tell you to grow up, but limit it. People tell you to grow up, but once they see you with a such bad book, they suddenly become a saint and cover your eyes. If you want people to be more mature, do not pick certain cherries out of the batch. People do mature other time. The more they read books like The Miseducation Of Cameron Post, the more mature they become. The more parents, librarians, etc., pick out your books, the more you grow up not knowing a lot. …show more content…
High school is time where you find out who you are. Self-help is much better than talking to your parent about. Many might think it's “embarrassing” and hide in the corner, but the more they read books like this, the more mature they are. A lot of books have been banned from the school library that could help students and make their maturity levels rise. Nobody likes a classroom filled with giggles and red, blushing faces during a very “explicit” scene comes on an educational movie or clip. Teachers absolutely hate it and so do many other
This controversial book has been challenged in countless states for many years. In 1997 the Elgin, Illinois school district banned the book from middle school libraries. Catherine explained that the book was banned because “talk of masturbation, birth control, and disobedience to parents occurred”
In the novel Steinbeck uses profanity which may be inappropriate for high school students. There’s drinking, smoking, swearing, and extramarital sex. There are many high school students who may not be ready to read a novel with that much profanity. In the novel it talks about the preacher and how he would rape women. That’s one thing that I strongly disagree with the content being in a novel for high
Why should this novel be banned from use in schools? Students should be able to hear these words and talk about them and not use them offensively. Racial content, tension, and slurs are used in people’s everyday lives. If people can use these words outside of school why would they not be allowed to be talked about in school? It is important for everyone to be informed about these racial tensions. This book also shows the reader what is was like to be growing up in this time period. Although this book uses the n-word, it uses it in a historical way. Using these racist words explains the way of thinking of the south in the 1930s. To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee is appropriate to use and read in school.
Teachers and parents are very protective of children. That is okay for the most part, but at some point the children are going to have to grow up. It is fine for some censorship in books for schools, but maybe just for the actual children. In high school, every student is referred to as a “young adult.” Let these kids be young adults by reading some adult language. J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye should be banned for elementary and middle school but allowed in high schools.
For many years schools have banned books from being taught to their students because of parent complaints. These books have been shunned from the criteria, which may or may not affect the student’s understanding on a specific subject. People have been fighting to have these books banned because of excessive use of profanity, violence, sex, drugs and many other reasons. They do not look further in the books to see exactly what the author is trying to portray. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain, is banned in various places in the United States. This book should not be banned because, this book shows an important part in our history, it is not pro-racism, and it shows how far along we have come since then.
Is it possible to talk about the good of this issue? In my opinion I find it as a way of teaching children who are soon to be teens what growing up means. It clearly explains that Lucky, the character in the book, is preparing herself to be a grown up. I personally find this as a good idea to slowly teach pre-teens of the body as they get older. So why ban the book? Ms. Patron clearly states that the book is aimed for children from nine to twelve years old. From my understanding these are about the last two years of elementary school and the start of your first year in middle school. There’s nothing bad about writing a book about growing up that is aimed at a young audience who can learn from it. One way I can relate this is with a health class in high school. The teachers in a health class will talk about and show pictures of sexually transmitted diseases. Does that mean that other teachers can go and complain about it? Well yes they can but they cannot start a petition to ban the class from schools. I understand that i...
Kids that age should not be using that kind of language, but, let's face it, in high school, teenagers are going to say bad things they shouldn't. Most books that contain bad language, are set for a higher grade level and shouldn't be available to elementary kids. In my opinion us high schoolers, and few middle schoolers, are mature enough to read books with that kind of language. Plus they have the option not to read those types of books if they find it offensive.
Some of the best literature, also happens to be some of the most controversial pieces. The books mentioned above, some were banned because of language, other because of racism and sexuality, but all of them were important pieces about life lessons people should read about. I believe that books like these actually enhance our learning abilities, and not daunt them. I believe that it should not be up to the government, or the FCC, to control what citizens do or do not read in school systems. They have taken away enough by taking The Bible out of schools, it is a right our founding fathers gave to us when this country was first established, t...
Moreover, a society is not portrayed as a fair society unless ideas and opinions are flourished individually and equally through the society. According to the 1st Amendment of the United States, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” which means that “prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,” is unfair to us and violates the freedom of “the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (Source F). If students don’t have the right to be free and explore through different types of books then that is dehumanization against our society. According to student surveys, a substantial amount of teens were gathered to read books that were considerably banned in school and this was their response after the survey; “I really liked how it was written. Also I really liked...
But why? After all the book is a satire and you would think people would realize that pretty early on. However, since they didn't, or haven't they find many reasons to have the book banned, such as drugs, sex, and violence, as well as sexism and racism. In the beginning of the book we are introduced to a class of students touring the facility that grows children, we learn about how much has changed in this world compared to our own, eventually we get to a group of children playing a game called "hunt the zipper" in which the children run around and "hunt the zipper" (you can figure out what that means) And even later we hear of the children learning about sex, a worker who is explaining all that the children have done that day to the director say, "We had Elementary Sex for the first forty minutes," she answered. "But now it's switched over to Elementary Class Consciousness." The Director walked slowly down the long line of cots. Rosy and relaxed with sleep, eighty little boys and girls lay softly breathing." (Huxley) From both of these examples it could be pretty obvious why someone would want to ban the book's, but if we're being honest, there's probably more if this book is going to be banned so frequently. What could there possibly be in this book that would make parents wish to remove this book/ It has to be something that parents are
The novel, The Catcher In the Rye, should not be banned from inclusion in the literature courses taught at the high school level. Banning this novel contradicts an individual's inalienable rights as an United States citizen. It limits freedom of speech and as well as other forms of expression. Although controversial, profanity is not a reason to limit an individual's rights. America is founded on principles that are not fueled by exceptions. Profanity is not an exception to freedom of speech. The Catcher in the Rye should not be excluded from curriculums at the high school level.
One reason I would like to support my inquiry with is maturity. I must say that while it does seem reasonable to ban certain books for explicit material in grammar schools, and even intermediate schools, the upper grade levels- high school students and so on; should not be forced to suffer such consequences. I feel that at my 11th year grade level, students should be mature enough to accept certain material such as sexual activity or political satires in books. Furthermore, being we are under our parent’s rule until the age of eighteen, a note may be sent home to notify parents of presentation of mentioned controversial novels or classics in our lessons. The parent may be able to sign a form or send in a note if they feel their child is not mature enough, or if such reading goes against specific personal beliefs of the family. The student may be given an alternative assignment if above mentioned form or note is returned with a denial of permission to study the book....
This article addresses some of the reasons that censors attempt to remove books from the curriculum: Many censors feel that works are not age appropriate for students.
Some people may argue, if kids didn’t read about these things, they wouldn’t know about them, but in all reality, that’s absurd. Some kids hear foul language and use it before they can even read. Children see things, hear things and do things, that we consider “bad” in these books, before they have even touched a chapter book. We should not be able
“You don’t have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them,” posited Ray Bradbury, author of the critically acclaimed Fahrenheit 451 detailing a society wrought with regular book burnings and a complete suppression of ideas. This quote exemplifies the threat that censorship poses to the reading habits of young people, a threat that is ever present in the school library. School media specialists face a challenge in cultivating a collection of materials that will entice young readers who, on average, resist reading. Add to that a librarian who self-censors, chooses not to include popular yet controversial books, and there is the potential to alienate teenage student readers altogether. Books have long been a safe environment where students are able to explore, through literature, complicated issues concerning morality and ethics with lower risk than in real life. If censorship becomes a mainstay of the school library, whether imposed by the community or by the selective librarian, there is great potential for the student body to suffer the effects.