Essay On Phyllis Shlafly

1475 Words3 Pages

Phyllis Schlafly is an anti-feminist, she convinced congress to not pass the Equal Rights Amendment. The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was written by Alice Paul and she introduced the amendment to congress in 1923. The ERA was a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution designed to guarantee equal rights for all sexes. Phyllis Schlafly, a right-wing leader of the Eagle Forum/STOP ERA, played an important role in arguing against the amendment. Phyllis Schlafly is against modern feminist movements because modern feminists believe that the differences between men and women are just a social construct, colleges and women's studies courses guide women to a career path that has no space for men, marriage or children, and treating women …show more content…

Before the ERA, Schlafly did not take much interest in feminism. She turned to antifeminism which reflected a turn in grassroots conservativism to social issues, which would not be linked to communism or defense. Schlafly fought with Betty Friedan, a feminist, about the traditional family. Friedan believed that the American women were only taught to “accept traditional, middle class gender roles of homemakers and housewives.” (217) With women playing the same gender roles it could keep them from pursing their dreams and using their skills in the workplace. Social pressures have a big toll on a women for being the “perfect” mother. Even though Friedan had a point about women being labeled as an “improper mother” if they did not fit the ideal social norms, Schlafly argued that “women benefited from the ‘Christian tradition of chivalry,’ which obligated men to support and protect their wives and children.” (218) She believed women where the recipients of technology advances of the late 1800s and 1900s. Schlafly even wrote “the real liberation of women from backbreaking drudgery to prior centuries is ‘the American free enterprise system which stimulated inventive geniuses’ to provide women with laborsaving devices.” (218) Schlafly continued to argue how the ERA “was a direct threat to the protection of mothers and working women enjoyed in American society.” (218) Most women want to be a wife, mother, and homemaker which …show more content…

Gender equality also means gay and lesbian rights. One of the issue that divided the pro-ERA groups with the anti-ERA was the perception of overlap between the issue of gay rights and abortion. Homosexual marriages in the 1970s and 1980s was still a big issue. Religious and conservative activist where not too excited about the gender equality because it meant that gays and lesbians would have more rights and would likely be led to homosexual marriages. Americas in the ‘70s and ‘80s were not ready to accept homosexual marriages. Anita Bryant, who led the Political Movement to repeal Miami’s anti-discriminatory ordinance, fostered links to fight against the ERA movement. She said “for many social conservatives, the two causes (of the ERA, and gay rights) were related, especially since Phyllis Schlafly insisted that the ERA would lead to the legalization of same-sex marriages.” (83) Bryant’s efforts paid off: Miami’s gay rights ordinance was repealed. Social conservatives also blamed the gay rights activist for putting the traditional American Family “under attack.” The ERA might threaten the traditional American Family. The ERA would also put abortion funding a new constitution right. Since abortion is a medical producer only operated on women, therefore it is a “sex discrimination.” Even though the ERA was proposed to outlaw gender-based discrimination at the time, the amendment was too liberal for the average

Open Document