Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social media influence political participation
Significant role of transnational corporations in the global economy
The role of transnational corporations in globalisation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social media influence political participation
Onlinedatei vom 14.12.2015 02:23 Kate Lucas Essay Response Globalization in the 20th Century emerged from the smoke of a devastating world war, thrived in the advent of rapidly advancing modes of travel and communication, and was met with a wave of economic and political reform in western democratic nations. The nature of globalization in the 21st Century is less a natural continuation of this process than a reaction to it, as policies implemented in the late 20th century struggle to address a host of problems considered unforeseeable at one point, but which are now painfully evident. During the 20th Century, modern globalization arguably began following the postWWII Era, which can be thought of in two phases: the 30 year “golden age” of welfare The consequences of policy changes in the last few decades of the 20th century, ushered in by the neoliberal movement, are becoming more and more evident. “Neoliberal structural adjustment programmes engineered by the IMF and the World Bank have been implemented in every country cross the globe, based on price stabilization, fiscal discipline, privatization, deregulation, trade liberalization, reduction of tarrifs, liberalization of capital markets, and the opening of economies” (Hemerijick 130). In this structure, transnational corporations have come to dominate the international political landscape in the 21st century, with troubling results. The workforce in various countries must organize transnationally as well as domestically in order to represent its interests, and with concerted efforts by several western democratic countries to legislatively weaken labor representation, many groups are having trouble doing that at home, let alone in a highly bureaucratized framework operated by capitalist and government elite (Tarrow 236237). The consequence of these policies? Opening up the competitive market for dominating financial interests. The method? Creating a quasipolitical structure that could not operate without the expertise and ‘consultation’ of transnational corporations, who often go so far as to help draft legislation adopted by actors in the international community, and then defend it to As a global community, we are more connected than ever before, not just economically, but culturally. Individuals have access to a huge array of information, and while some hope the proliferation of online technology will lead to political reform in oppressed nations, others point out ISIS and its use of Facebook as an effective recruiting tool, or the ways inaccurate or flawed information can be so easily spread to millions of people as
Globalization has, for better or worse, altered the economic arena for every country in the world. For many less developed countries, globalization has leveled the playing field so that their economies can compete with the larger, more developed ones such as the United States and other large western economies. For instance, technical engineers in India and China are now just as qualified as engineers in America, but at half the cost. The once large and prosperous service sector in the United States as well as telemarketing services have largely been sourced to India as a large exodus of American multinational corporations find cheaper workers who deliver comparable quality. This then seems to be the essence of globalization - businesses will go wherever it’s cheaper and more cost effective to do business, but without sacrificing the quality of the product, service, or experience. It follows that developed nations would stand at a considerable disadvantage against developing nations because most business, in terms of the cost of labor, is too expensive to conduct in developed nations as opposed to developing ones. However, Dani Rodrick, a specialist in international political economy, contradictorily asserts that globalization has brought little but good news to those with the products, skills, and resources in developing nations to market worldwide. He points out that for most of the world's developing countries, “the 1990s were a decade of frustration and disappointment. … Most of the former socialist economies ended the decade at lower levels of per-capita income than they started it—and even in the rare successes, such as Poland, poverty rates remained higher than under communism. East Asian economies such as South Korea, Thail...
Throughout history, the press has long been known for its didactic approach to educating and gaining supporters of a cause. Written by a select few, newspapers and news broadcasts have been inadvertently biased in their deliverance of current events. However, with this increasing rich pool of information coming from a network of authors, the internet has become the new portal to current events – throughout the world. Particularly, new media, such as blogging or “tweeting”, has had a shockingly profound and lasting effect on non-democratic countries around the world, setting a firm foundation for revolutions. It has introduced a world far more informational and accommodating, setting up a fundamental basis to spark revolutions around the world. New media allows a brief glimpse into democratic societies and cultures formerly unbeknownst to a people, triggering curiosity and anger strong enough to overcome even the most oppressive despot. Specifically, social networking is a powerful tool prevalently influencing peace building and influencing individuals to leverage resources such as Facebook, Tumblr, or Youtube to further prevent violence and promote peace among a nation.
Social media has quickly emerged as a dominating force that is not only shaping culture and global trends, but influencing how others perceive the world by making it easier to access world news and public opinions. “The global media landscape in the first decade of the twenty-first century represents a complex terrain of multi-vocal, multimedia and multi-directional flows” (Thussu 376). Although social media has spurred many revolutions and brought together like-minded thinkers, it still proves to be a difficult terrain to navigate and even more difficult to harness its power for long-standing democracy. In the article "Social Media: Destroyer or Creator?" and Wael Ghonim’s TED talk, both the positive and the negative ramifications of social
When the term “Globalization” is discussed, most academics, scholars, professionals and intellectuals attempt to define and interpret it in a summarized fashion. My main concern with this approach is that one cannot and should not define a process that altered decades of history and continues to, in less than 30 words. Global Shift is a book with remarkable insight. Peter Dicken rather than attempting to define the commonly misused word, explains Globalization in a clear and logical fashion, which interconnects numerous views. Dicken takes full advantage of his position to write and identify the imperative changes of political, economic, social, and technological dimensions of globalization.
In its essence, neo-liberalism advocates free trade, private enterprise, the free flow of capital across borders and, importantly, restrictions on the power of trade unions. These restrictions are important to study and discuss because the world today is no longer regulated by the orthodox laws of economics where supply equals demand (more or less). Instead, we witness radical inequalities and volatility in market conditions. Unemployment remains frighteningly high in many parts of Europe while many workers in parts of Asia and Africa suffer exploitation and work punishingly long hours in extremely poor conditions for a pittance.
Social Studies – 10 Essay “To what extent should we embrace transnational corporations into the world economy?” Transnational corporations should be embraced when it comes to the economy because they provide many opportunities of education, employment and social exchange. Although there are examples that workers in less developed countries (China, Africa, Jamaica, etc.) that are denied many basic rights and paid a very low income, the amount money workers receive are outstandingly low compared to a worker in a developed country. Transnational corporations include a variety of cultural exchange, which is an example of social globalization. Cultural exchange is very important because it involves different people to connect, share ideas and experience new technology that may have not been easily accessible to the public if not for transnational corporations and their mass production.
Many historians and sociologists have identified a transformation in the economic processes of the world and society in recent times. There has been an extensive increase in developments in technology and the economy as a whole in the twentieth century. Globalization has been recognized as a new age in which the world has developed into what Giddens identifies to be a “single social system” (Anthony Giddens: 1993 ‘Sociology’ pg 528), due to the rise of interdependence of various countries on one another, therefore affecting practically everyone within society.
With a larger amount of individuals on social media websites the probability that a higher amount of individuals will be affected and influenced by ISIS’ posts is inevitably greater. Social media has altered the ways members of societies get knowledge of what is going on in the world and their societies (Kavamaugh et al, 2012, p. 480). Times have changed in our societies, members don’t read newspapers as much, and they rely on their social media to get all the update news and information. Yet, when ISIS’ posts are all over Twitter and Facebook, certain vulnerable social media users will fall victim to the ISIS’ ideology. Basically, in the end ISIS is having a large amount of control over what is on
Media today has made significant leaps in terms of advancements in technology since the beginning of the 20th century. Globalization has led to the breaking down of communication barriers between nation states and now news media can be accessed all over the world; giving exposure to events of war, economic, political and humanitarian strife. This in turn will lead to greater awareness of humanitarian crisis in places such as the Middle East. It has only been in the past two decades that ‘new’ media took the world of media even further. The term ‘new’ means to facilitate information sharing, one of the components of effective resistance; those in countries such as Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq use social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter to show the rest of the world what the news media is unable to. This type of media was the beginning of an information revolution and the changing of the nature of conflict by strengthening network forms of organization over hierarchical forms. Activists in Tunisia who were ag...
Recent technology and new social media websites and apps have changed the world forever. This is no longer disputed. When Mark Zuckerberg launched Facebook in 2004 he could not have imagined the forces it would unleash (Wadhwa). A new era was created. One that would connect the world in a way never imagined. But it was not just Facebook. Many websites dedicated to the art of social media were created and embraced. The new tools of social media have reinvented social activism as we know it (Gladwell). All of this change inevitably brings upon many questions. The most important question of them all: is social media a good thing for the world? This is a fair question. The new social-media filled world is a different world than the one known by the baby-boomers. This new world is filled with change, and with change comes uncertainty. This paper is designed to answer the question posed before and will argue that social media has ultimately changed the world for the better by giving people connecting the world, changing the way political campaigns are ran, changing public policy, and giving people stronger voices in the news media and in general.
“Social media, a web-based and mobile technology, has turned communication into a social dialogue, and dominates the younger generation and their culture. As of 2010, Generation Y now outnumbers Baby Boomers, and 96% of Gen Y has joined a social network” (Qualman 1). Social media now accounts for the number one use of the Internet, and this percentage is rising bigger every day (Qualman). As a consequence, people are becoming more reliant on social media, which has a led to a number of advantageous as well as unfavorable effects. The world is more connected today than it has ever been in the past, and this is all because of growth in technology. What has yet to be determined though
After the cold war, word ‘globalization’ was commonly used at a time of unprecedented interconnectedness when advanced nations experienced a ruthless development by exploiting energy resources and stressing culture forms in developing countries. To identify the definition of ‘globalization’, it is significant to clarify its appearance as well as implication.
First of all globalization has led to exploitation of labor. We can’t ignore the fact that ethical aspects of international business deserve special attention. Corruption and engaging in illegal practice to make greater profit is a source of continuing controversy. Sometimes companies go international and move their production to foreign countries so they could employ workers for long hours, at low wages and in poor working conditions (sweat shops). They are also using child labor, the employment of children to a full time work that can be otherwise done by adults all that so they could get out of their responsibility towards their workers by avoiding paying them national insurance …When these multinational firms go abroad they forget all about principles and about human beings and their rights, according to Kent, J., Kinetz, E. & Whehrfritz, G. (2008/March24). Newsweek. Bottom of the barrel. “The dark side of globalization: a vast work force trapped in conditions that verge on slavery”, David, P. Falling of The Edge, Travels through the Dark Heart of Globalization..Nov 2008. (p62) also agrees with them when he explained his concerns about Chinese and Indians t...
The impact of globalisation is that international trade has grown rapidly in recent years and decades resulting in transport volumes growing accordingly. Globalisation is an ongoing process in which economic interaction and trading activity will continie to grow and grow faster in future this because countries are become increasingly geographically unrestricted.
Krain, Matthew (2005), “AP Comparative Government and Politics Briefing Paper: Globalization,” [http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/ap05_comp_govpol_glob_42253.pdf], accessed 15 May 2012.