Compare And Contrast Essay On Captivity And Wild Animals

778 Words2 Pages

Wild Animals vs. Animals in Captivity
Although animals in captivity are provided with their basic needs to survive and more, wild animals are more likely to thrive and reach their full potential.
Animals in the wild face greater environmental changes than animals who live in a zoo. An animal living in a zoo most likely has an enclosed area with a set climate and most everything they need to live comfortably. Wild animals, on the other hand, have to face harsh changes in their environment like droughts, floods, and forest fires. Animals in the wild can be challenged with heavy rains and rising level which can cause them to lose their homes and ultimately a place to hide from predators. Day in and day out, wild animals have to face or find shelter from these changes and their predators while captive animals don’t have to worry about either because zoos assure that they will have comfortable and safe living conditions. …show more content…

When wild animals are faced with forest fires and droughts this affects the food chain greatly. For example, if herd of gazelles is faced with a long drought or a wildfire in the savanna, their food supply can become extremely limited which could cause competition among the herd or could become completely depleted. If all the gazelles die off, what are the lions and cheetahs supposed to feed on? What about the hyenas? They prey on lions and cheetah as one of their larger meals. How will this affect the smaller mammals in this area because hyenas are skipping out on this meal? In contrast, an animal in captivity will never have to worry about any of those conditions or not having enough food because, when a zoo animal becomes hungry, zoo personnel takes care of it right

More about Compare And Contrast Essay On Captivity And Wild Animals

Open Document