Essay

1100 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Similarity and difference between morality and ethics

Our belief states are determined by the external factors, for example, perceived complexity and priming ethics is an interesting subject and everyone lives by their thoughts and their ways. Everyone lives by a different code. The difference between morality and ethics is that morality is about primary making the right choices and ethics is proper reasoning. In the essay “The ethics of belief” by W. K. Clifford, he argues that if anything on insufficient evidence, then it’s unethical. In this essay I will remain undecided with what Clifford is trying to say. I agree and disagree with some of his viewpoints. Some I do have to say are unethical and some are reasonable. What Clifford is trying to portray is interesting. Especially since he comes from a religious background. And reading about his new discovery, is quite interesting. I will start off by agreeing with Clifford that we should have sufficient evidence before making an assumption. But I don’t believe that just because we don’t have sufficient evidence it’s automatically wrong. I think that we have to look at the foundations first. And we have to look at the foundations that we know and if they’re where some reasons to doubt, then I will have to doubt the principles. And I think that knowledge does not depend upon things of whose existence I don’t have knowledge yet. So how can we say that if there isn’t enough evidence to support a claim, why is it considered wrong? I find it illogical because just because there still isn’t enough evidence, doesn’t mean its wrong, its just not considered right or wrong. We don’t have enough proof to make it erroneous. And we can’t assume anything until there are enough indications to make it otherwise. In the essay “The ethics of belief” ... ... middle of paper ... ... their idea of right and wrong is just an opinion. And opinions are dismissal. Just because Clifford doesn’t have any faith, doesn’t mean that he has to tell everyone to not make any decisions without concrete and sufficient evidence. The reason is because people shouldn’t lie to themselves. The man who lies to himself doesn’t understand himself. I think that Clifford did make a mistake in saying that anything without sufficient evidence is considered wrong. As a reasonable person we have the capacity to decide which of our desires, if any, we will act on. I do approve that we do have to have evidence to believe in something, but I don’t agree that if we don’t have enough evidence then it’s wrong. We can’t say that without having sufficient proof that, that statement is false. And everything depends on what you believe, because what you believe is what you hear.

Show More
Related

  • Without Evidence Or Argument Clark Analysis

    922 Words  | 2 Pages

    Clifford’s claims. Clifford believes that everything must be believed only on the basis of sufficient evidence, including belief in God (Feinberg 139). Clark’s issue with this statement, is that Clifford emphasises that adequate evidence is necessary for all beliefs and in every circumstance (Feinberg 139). Personally, I do not think it is necessary to hold every belief to the same standard of evidence because of the existence of faith and the fact that not everything has to be seen to exist. In John 20:29 it says, “Then Jesus told him, ‘Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed’” (NIV Bible). In this passage, Jesus is saying that believing without the visual evidence is particularly harder than having the evidence, but more importantly, it is possible and blessed. Additionally, in 2 Corinthians 5:7 it reads, “For we live by faith, not by sight” (NIV Bible). It is important to notice that in this verse it does not say that we only live by faith and not by sight when it comes to belief in God, but instead we can in every area of life. One reason why we live by faith and not by sight or complete evidence is because it is more practical because as humans we have limited knowledge about the vastness of the universe and every individual thing. Furthermore, in conjunction with Clark’s example against Clifford, it would not

    Read More

  • Comparing Beowulf and Jesus

    469 Words  | 1 Pages

    When all the evidence is noted (and there is even more beyond that which is stated here), one can not ignore the overwhelming presence of a

    Read More

  • essay

    1105 Words  | 3 Pages

    Distinctively visual language and cinematic techniques highlight to the responder the particular literal and metaphorical experiences characters are faced with, within a text. Peter Goldsworthy’s novel Maestro, Don McLean’s song ‘Vincent’ and the intriguing film Australia by Baz Luhrrman, explore the ways in which the human experiences of an individual’s connection to landscape is fundamental in shaping one’s sense of identity, personal growth and development. Composers further explore the realisation that our lives can be enriched by an understanding and appreciation of art as well as a deeper understanding of the importance of love and lust. The depiction of characters is conveyed through distinctively visual images to highlight the subsequent development of courage and resilience leads responders to a deeper understanding of how human experiences can create a sense of individuality.

    Read More

  • The Principle of Credultiy, the Will to Believe, and the Role of Rationality and Evidence in Religious Experience

    572 Words  | 2 Pages

    The thrust of William James' argument in The Will to Believe is captured in the following argument; "Our passional nature not only lawfully may, but must, decide an option between propositions, whenever it is a genuine option that cannot by its nature be decided on intellectual grounds; for to say, under such circumstances, "Do not decide, but leave the question open, " is itself a decision—just like deciding yes or no,--and is attended with the same risk of losing the truth." While not denying the importance of reasoning and evidence for many of our beliefs, James forsakes objective certainty. He claims that we can never be absolutely sure of anything except that consciousness exists. The belief in truth springs more from desire and feeling than from reason. James indicates that religious belief doesn't have to be based on evidence, it can be a personal decision made from the heart.

    Read More

  • is it justified to have faith

    704 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... create fact. For example, it has been proven that optimism increases the life-span of patients with terminal disease. In fact, most patients force themselves to believe that they can be cured, even though they know it is impossible to happen, in order to achieve a more beneficial result, which they do. Plus, I don’t think anyone would find it hard to understand opinions that we disagree with. So until Long can establish that we cannot experience any of the pragmatic benefits he lists without having faith, his reasoning is not persuasive enough to oppose Clifford’s.

    Read More

  • Ethics Of Belief Analysis

    1001 Words  | 3 Pages

    William Clifford author of the “Ethics of Belief” creates the argument that it is always wrong for anyone to believe anything upon ‘insufficient evidence’. What does Clifford define evidence as and what is sufficient? Clifford’s argument is more scientific. Basing our beliefs off methodical approaches. If we base all our decisions off sufficient and what we declare to be reliable then what do we stand for? We have our own credentials to believe things even if we do not know why. These beliefs could be innate and

    Read More

  • Essay

    1066 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our role as nursing leaders is to place a high priority on our commitment to educating ourselves, while improving the lives of patients through collaborative and transformational nursing leadership. I have chosen to pursue the Doctorate of Nursing Practice to transform and revolutionize best practice outcomes. While exploring program types, I considered the PhD, however this degree placed an emphasis on academics and research. My final decision was centered on how to affect change in nursing practice at the bedside. The decision to apply to Yale was based on the time-tested, world-class faculty and scholars available to the DNP student. Yale is a leader in higher education and I am seeking the very best.

    Read More

  • William Clifford The Ethics Of Belief Summary

    1224 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his essay “The Ethics of Belief” William K. Clifford argues that it is always and everywhere wrong to believe in something without sufficient evidence. His premise is that we have a moral obligation to examine our beliefs and find sufficient cause for believing them and he concludes with stating “truth can only be gained through objective verification”, like- a mathematical proof. Clifford‘s essay is intended to be a moral rejection of subjectivism, this is when we say that truth can be found within oneself, through one‘s own experiences, for example the children in Fatima who believe in God because they think the Blessed Mother appeared to them and gave them a message or when people “pray for a sign” and then think they see that “sign”.

    Read More

  • Moral Realism's Indispensability Argument

    1969 Words  | 4 Pages

    There are many arguments for moral realism, one of which is presented by David Enoch, who posits a unique explanation of how normative truths can exist. He argues for moral realism by using his Indispensability Argument, which explains the necessity of normative facts in deliberation. I will argue that Enoch’s claim is valid in that it fairs well against opposition, however it shows weakness by not addressing moral subjectivity.

    Read More

  • William James And Clifford Analysis

    616 Words  | 2 Pages

         William James holds the argument in that he believes humans have a right to believe even when the supporting evidence is ineffective. James also believes that the existence of human beings is far more important that most things. James touches on genuine choice and talks

    Read More

  • Hales Views On Intrinsic Truth

    257 Words  | 1 Pages

    Hales’ argument that it is not okay to believe whatever you want is sound based on intrinsic value and the rational principle. Intrinsic truth is valuable in itself regardless of what it produces in the outcome. If you believe that knowing the truth is certain, without any doubt, then believing in whatever thought or idea you have about anything without justification and certainty would be intellectually wrong. Therefore to believe in whatever you want would be wrong. According to the rational principle, truth should be sought and errors avoided. If you willingly avoid seeking the truth to your belief or irresponsibly ignore the truth to your belief, you are wrong. Is it or is it not wrong to do whatever you want? If you believe that

    Read More

  • William James The Will To Believe Analysis

    996 Words  | 2 Pages

    Upon reading Will to Believe, there is no doubt we will all begin to question how we’ve gotten to our beliefs and why we believe what we do. William James argues against forced beliefs and expresses the importance of choice. The idea of choice is one I strongly agree with. Although we are easily influenced by others, when it comes to beliefs free will must come into play. As far as the science method, which I have discussed, a belief is just as valid whether there is evidence or not because most scientific methods will never be one hundred percent proven and they will change over

    Read More

  • Does God Exist Research Paper

    1643 Words  | 4 Pages

    One of the most heavily debated topics of discussion throughout the world is the existence of God. No matter where one lives or their background there is always some religion claiming to know the true God, and many others believing in no gods at all. There are many logical arguments for the existence of God that each have unique features from philosophers such as William Paley, and Blaise Pascal. But where there are believers in God there are also those who do not believe there is enough evidence to believe, these individuals include William Clifford and William James. The various arguments used for the belief, and even the disbelief in God, provides that based upon evidence it is more beneficial to believe in the existence of God.

    Read More

  • Wk Clifford The Ethics Of Belief Analysis

    1227 Words  | 3 Pages

    What if every belief you had, no matter how small it seems, can cause harm to others and corrupt the society, if your reasoning for holding that belief is not backed by sufficient evidence? This is what philosopher W. K. Clifford argues in, The Ethics of Belief. Clifford believes it is always wrong to believe in something with insufficient evidence. A belief with insufficient evidence is a principle that does not have indisputable or reasonable confirmation that prove it be true. His reasoning is, if one believes something with insufficient evidence, it can harm and corrupt others. If one harms or corrupts another, then they are doing something wrong. One believes something without insufficient evidence, therefore they are doing something wrong.

    Read More

  • According To Harman's Argument Is A Good One?

    584 Words  | 2 Pages

    The philosopher Gilbert Harman argues for skepticism about morality, claiming that moral observations are not reliable and shouldn’t be trusted since the is no good reason to believe otherwise. By holding this view there is then a lack of evidence for or against moral disagreement. I will argue that Harman’s argument is a good one. In this essay I will explain Harman’s argument, I will then propose objections to show how it might fail and argue why as to why the criticisms wouldn’t succeed.

    Read More

More about Essay

Open Document