William James And Clifford Analysis

616 Words2 Pages

William James and W.K. Clifford both had very exceptional arguments regarding if it is acceptable to hold beliefs without proper evidence, and there is a national debate going on for years regarding who was right and who was wrong. They both had very valid logic to their reasoning behind what the stood for, but they also had totally different outlooks on the argument. Being that I have read both arguments, they both bring up crucial points and details along the way. William James holds the argument in that he believes humans have a right to believe even when the supporting evidence is ineffective. James also believes that the existence of human beings is far more important that most things. James touches on genuine choice and talks

Open Document