Erikson And Gilligan's Theoretical Analysis

1486 Words3 Pages

After completing the group theoretical framework project for class, I was able to further understand the difference between traditional and alternatives theories. Furthermore, I obtain a better understanding and perception of both Erickson and Gilligan’s theories. This paper will on reflect my critical understanding and perceptions of the use of Erikson and Gilligan’s theories with marginalized populations in social work practice. As well as any ethical issues that I saw when applying these theories to a client’s situation. Traditional Theory: Erick Erikson Erik H. Erikson was born in 1902. Erikson developed a psychoanalytic theory of psychosocial development. His work was greatly influenced by Sigmund Freud theory. Over the middle of …show more content…

Erikson’s theoretical framework has faced many criticism over the years. Erikson’s Framework has been criticized for “conclusions about the relationship between anatomy and gender identity, an underdeveloped perspective on the centrality of intimacy and attachment, and for both falsely differentiating men and women or at other times overgeneralizing from men on to women” (Malone, Liu, Vaillant, Rentz, Waldinger, 2016).Furthermore, other theorist have argued that he focused more on male development rather than women’s. In addition, Erikson’s theoretical framework follows a more traditional ideals of family. Erikson's framework suggested that family members (especially parents and siblings) provide the primary motivation for early psychosocial development. However, in today society, “during the early stages of psychosocial development extrafamilial caregivers are more involved now than they were six decades ago” (Jones, Vaterlaus, Jackson, & Morrill, 2014). In recent years, the idea child care has shifted from parents to a variety of caregivers. Now more children are in daycare and other learning …show more content…

It’s important to recognize that many of the research that have been done in previous years had been focus mainly on men. Women were not included. Theorist such as Erikson and Kohlberg main focus was on men. Gilligan saw that has a failure to see the differences between men and women. Her theory offers social workers a way to understand how women and men experience things. Gilligan’s theory help us to understand how clients may see themselves, and how they make moral decisions. Using her theory social worker can get a better understanding of women identity formation, moral development and their relationship between care and

Open Document