Emerson's Self-Reliance: Non-Conformists Vs Nonconformist

354 Words1 Page

Emerson’s excerpt from “Self-Reliance” brought about a very important question we experience difficulty in answering: “why do we give?”. Payton and Moody suggests that “it is our human nature, in part, that impels us to respond philanthropically” (Payton & Moody 64). Emerson points out the differences between conformists and nonconformists, in that nonconformists are true to their human nature unlike the first who are true to societal demands and norms. He proposes “if malice and vanity wear the coat of philanthropy, shall that pass?” and follows with an example of an angry bigot commitment to charity for black folks in Barbados (Davis & Lynn 204). In other words, he is asking what good is one’s charity if it is not of their nature to begin

Open Document