El Cid and Kracauer’s Mass Ornament

1015 Words3 Pages

The numerous historical films that merely illustrate the past

are attempts at deception according to their own terms.

Since one always runs the danger, when picturing current

events, of turning easily excitable masses against powerful

institutions that are in fact often not appealing, one prefers to

direct the camera towards a Middle Ages that the audience

will find harmlessly edifying. The further back the story is

situated historically, the more audacious filmmakers

become. They will risk depicting a successful revolution in

historical costumes in order to induce people to forget

modern revolutions, and they are happy to satisfy the

theoretical sense of justice by filming struggles for freedom

that are long past.1

Kracauer’s analysis of the historical film culminates in a dismissal of

historical, and thereby factual, efficacy. In this circumstance, the period piece can

assume an earlier time frame as a departure from the burden of accuracy rather

than an acceptance of it. Academic records indicate that El Cid (dir. Anthony

Mann, 1961) ignores much of Rodrigo Díaz de Bivar’s factual exploits as a

warrior for hire, fighting more often for compensation than any religious or moral

certitude. Why, then, was this character’s story so appealing as a platform for a

historical epic film? El Cid’s historical ambivalence suggests that it’s story is more

appropriately detailed for potential aesthetic achievement than realism.

Kracauer begins describing the aesthetic condition of the mass ornament

as a reference to the Tiller Girls, a performance group based on visual uniformity.

He focuses on their performance of emulation and repetition, through which they

are “no longer individual girls, but indissoluble girl clusters whose movements are

demonstrations of mathematics.... One need only glance at the screen to learn

that the ornaments are composed of thousands of bodies, sexless bodies in

bathing suits. The regularity of their patterns is cheered by the masses,

1 This passage is taken from Siegfried Kracauer’s essay “The Little Shopgirls Go to the Movies.”

themselves arranged by the stands in tier upon ordered tier.2” Already, there is

an allegory bridging this performance art with the cinema. The masses are

clearly the film’s intended audience gathered in a theater, which composes the

modern medium for the cinematic ornament.

The film’s actors become the performative aspect of this equation, wherein

their acting and involvement in a character role, no matter how important, is

meager and unnecessary without the remainder of the operative whole. The film

opens with a revelatory glance at this phenomenon, as Rodrigo carries a cross

through an empty landscape. In retrospect, his great battles and leadership are

abstract and ineffectual without the massive army of followers. As the stand-in

Christ figure, he showcases the absence of the epic’s ornament: a solitary figure,

Open Document