Drug Detection Dogs

1178 Words3 Pages

Drug detecting dogs are vital components in the search and seizure of illegal substances. Many law enforcement agencies have canine officers in all countries. The use of canine officers varies however, depending on the budget, size, and the needs of the agency. Drug detecting dogs are not as efficient in their discovering of illegal substances and deterring of repeat offenders as most have thought. However, the efficiency of the drug detection dogs varies on many different factors. In a study conducted in Poland in 2013, it was found that the effectiveness of drug detection varies by several factors. Among them was breed, training level, and the type of drug. In the study, they chose several different breeds. Sixty-eight Labrador retrievers, …show more content…

These two breeds were further broken down into four groups; forty explosive detecting Labradors, fifty-seven drug detecting Labradors, fifty explosive detecting Shepherds, and forty-six drug detecting Shepherds. Both genders were used in the study. The most important traits in both specialties of the responders that were studied were; the willingness to sniff objects, concentration during and on their task, their ability, acuity of smell and the willingness to bring an object back to a person. They were also rated in boldness in the areas of; novel surroundings, and fear of specific things and of sudden loud noises. All of those traits being in the ideal. Taking all traits together forty-three-point seven percent of drug detecting dogs and forty-four-point four percent of explosive detecting dogs showed an “ideal” level of the traits …show more content…

Instead of testing the dogs, the opinions and experiences of local regular drug users were the focus. For this study, they used the Ecstasy and Related Drugs Reporting System between the years of 2008 to 2010, a three-year period. The targeted area for this study New South Wales, which had the most reported Ecstasy use sightings. This is mostly attributed to the large amount of different festivals and different live-music concerts. The study viewed both regular Ecstasy users and infrequent Ecstasy users at said festivals and live-music concerts. With the increased police presence, along with the detection dogs, it was hypothesized that there would be a dip or a cut down in Ecstasy use. This hypothesis was proven to be incorrect. Detection and deterrence numbers remained low. While users both regular and infrequent noticed the dogs, they acted much differently than suspected. According to the study, approximately two-thirds of participating subjects had seen the dogs and had the substances on them. Out of that two-thirds, only seven percent of those people were pointed out and indicated by the dogs. The majority of the regular Ecstasy users who saw the dogs did not seem to care and took no actions to; dispose of, hide, or ingest. On the other side of the spectrum, the minority including the infrequent users, panicked and consumed the portions as quickly as possible, to dispose of the drug.

More about Drug Detection Dogs

Open Document