Drinking Water Chlorination Research

852 Words2 Pages

Issues Investigation- Part B- Angus Dally
Do the benefits of the chlorination of drinking water outweigh the risks?
Introduction
Public water in Australia and abroad, is chlorinated for disinfection. While effective at disinfection, disinfection by-products (DBP’s) pose many long term health risks. This begs the question: Do the benefits of the chlorination of drinking water outweigh the risks? There some alternatives to chlorination, such as ozonation and nano-filtration, and adopting even a slightly better way to disinfect water will have huge benefits, because of the sheer number of people using the current method.
Chemical Background
Chlorine acts to disinfect water by reacting with water to produce hypochlorous acid.
Cl2(g)+H2O(l)HCl(aq)+HOCl(aq) …show more content…

Sodium Hypochlorite is sometimes used instead, because of the health and safety risks associated with handling chlorine gas. (Dnr.gov, 2015)
NaOCl(l)+ H2O(l)Na(s)++HOCl¬(aq)+OH(aq)-
HOClH++OCl-
HOCl and OCl- are referred to as free available chlorine, and are the primary disinfection agents.
Before any of these reactions occur, and by extension, before any disinfection occurs, the chlorine demand must be met. Chlorine demand is the chlorine that is consumed in reactions before the primary, intended reactions. There are three main categories of chlorine demand:
1. Instantaneous
Instantaneous chlorine demand is the reactions with iron (Fe2+) and manganese (Mn2+) to form insoluble oxides.
2. Intermediate
Intermediate chlorine demand is the reactions of chlorine with ammonia to form chloramines. These chloramines provide limited disinfection, but not as much as hypochlorous acid and hypochlorite …show more content…

Diseases such as cholera, typhoid fever, dysentery and gastroenteritis, which were once extremely prevalent, have been virtually eradicated in countries like Australia and the US due to the use of chlorine in the disinfection process. Infant mortality rates have also been heavily decreased. The use of chlorinated water is considered one of the key factors in the massive increase in life expectancy, from around 45 years in the early 1900’s to almost 80 years today. (Waterandhealth.org, 2015). Chlorine is widely considered to be the best disinfection option, and in a survey of American public health officials 92% agreed that chlorine is crucial to eliminating waterborne diseases, and 87% believed that chlorination is the safest way to assure quality drinking water. (Waterandhealth.org, 2015)Over 98% of US water supplies are disinfected using chlorine, with the remainder primarily being from rural properties which source their water from a well or river. (Waterandhealth.org, 2015)
Chlorine is a very cheap method of disinfection. As of 2003, the cost of chlorinating water was 0.03 cents/litre. (Cdc.gov, 2015)Alternatives to chlorination, such as ozonation and nano-filtration, cost far more to implement and maintain. According to figure 1, the operating costs for a large treatment plant using chlorine are approximately $117,000 each year, while the cost when using ozone is about $2,000,000,

More about Drinking Water Chlorination Research

Open Document