Dramatic Tension in Arthur Miller's The Crucible

1769 Words4 Pages

Dramatic Tension in Arthur Miller's The Crucible Both acts 3 and 4 employ a variety of dramatic techniques to engage the audience in the fate of John Proctor. Miller continually shifts the focus from character to character throughout the scenes, which as a result produces a strong overall effect in the play. The play was written in the early 1950's during a time when there was a lot of unnecessary hysteria in the United States surrounding Communism, and although the play is based on the Salem witch hunts of 1692 they're similar to what was happening in America at the time. As the hatred towards Communism, the red plague, grew, the subsequent McCarthy trials and investigations into un-American activities were set up. This was very similar to what happened in Salem in 1692. However, the tragic dilemma of Proctor also teaches a universal issue understandable to us all. First, I will consider the dramatic function of the character whose views are closest to the audience Reverend Hale. He is a well-respected man in the community, as he is a witch hunter, and he provides the audience with a character that they are able to empathise with. His changing views resemble the audience's feelings, evidence for this is in that as the act progresses Miller makes him dramatically change his opinion toward the court case and the legal system. This would be what the audience would feel in their response to the horror of the play and how the court case develops and progresses. When he enters the play in act two, Hale seems to be convinced that he can prosecute witches in the court and he makes some people confess to witchcraft. However when he list... ... middle of paper ... ...e of them go against him, then he stumbles heavily. Miller here is exploiting the contextual background of the play - this is Salem, women would have no rights and no power, so it's ironic that the play is built around the testimony of women. Overall, though Miller has produced a well-executed play with a lot of dramatic tension built up in this, the strongest act and most important. At some points the audience is stunned and at others they are on the edge of their seat. This is what Miller intended to happen with this play as it portrays the true nature of the events in the 1950's surrounding Communism, the red plague, and the McCarthy trials. They are similar to what is now happening today in that there is a lot of racist hate among Americans toward the Arab world and particularly the Islamic states and people.

Open Document