Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and limitations of focus groups
Strengths and limitations of focus groups
Strengths of focus group interviews
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and limitations of focus groups
Focus group interview:
A small group discussion about some research topic led by a moderator who guides discussion among participants is termed as a focus group interview.
A focus group is, according to Lederman is ‘a technique involving the use of in-depth group interviews in which participants are selected because they are a purposive, although not necessarily representative, sampling of a specific population, this group being ‘focused’ on a given topic’. Participants in this type of research are, therefore, selected on the criteria that they would have something to say on the topic, are within the age-range, have similar socio-characteristics and would be comfortable talking to the interviewer and each other.
A focus group is a small group
…show more content…
Begin by transcribing all focus group tapes and inserting notes into transcribed material where appropriate. Clean up transcripts by stripping off nonessential words. The data must be very carefully entered into the excel sheet such that the data must be compiled, analyzed and synthesized.
ADVANTAGES OF USING FOCUS GROUPS
• Takes advantage of the fact that people naturally interact and are influenced by others
• May be one of the few research tools available for obtaining data from children or from individuals who are not particularly literate
• Provide data more quickly and at lower cost than if individuals interviewed separately; groups can be assembled on shorter notice than for a more systematic survey.
• Generally requires less preparation and is comparatively easy to conduct.
• Researcher can interact directly with respondents (allows clarification, follow-up questions, probing). Can gain information from non-verbal responses to supplement (or even contradict) verbal responses.
• Data uses respondents' own words; can obtain deeper levels of meaning, make important connections, identify subtle nuances
• Very flexible; can be used with wide range of topics, individuals, and
The first, focus groups, interviews conducted with 8 to 10 people with a trained moderator following an interview guide, a common useful approach for acquiring health care information. Also, useful in examining a wide range of sensitive health care issues. Second, probability sampling, units selected by chance, the sample’s reliability, and does not require detailed information about the population surveyed. The third option, mail surveys, inexpensive way to contact individuals over a large geographical area, provide anonymity to the respondent, and eliminate interviewer bias.
According to Halter (2014), all groups go through three phases of development which includes the orientation (introductory) phase, working phase and termination phase. As facilitators, we used motivational interviewing skills such as open-ended questions so that participants could engage in the discussion and share their experiences. Reflective listening and summary were used to recap some of the points discussed by the participants after each question. The group plan was very helpful in helping us keep up with the time.
Qualitative research aims to gather information from data collection methods and transform it into written words. Such as transcribing recorded interviews, taking field notes from observations, using words to outline images (Denscombe, 1998, p. 174). On the other hand, quantitative research aims to gather information from data collection methods and transform it into numbers. Such as analysing conducted surveys and pulling numbers to transform it into statistics, tables and graphs (Denscombe, 1998, p.174-177).
The mean of witch the authors went about on collecting data is sort of like field research. For an example, they would go into areas with the most problems in the chosen community. Instead of offering to help and solve the p...
... This will facilitate openness and new insight to the Spanish Speaking population being studied (Burns, & Grove, 2009, p. 546). After the data collector collects the information they will journal any thoughts or feelings about the information received and will reflect on the data collection process.
At 8:30 AM, Lisa lines up to transition to a Focus group as denoted by her teacher. In Focus, Lisa engages in a series of practice exercises around a challenging objective, modeled by the teacher. She may work in a small group created by her teacher to complete these practice exercises, work on personalized learning software for remediation or acceleration, or may be expected to complete a few problems to teach to the rest of the class.
...the information, their experiences, queries and how new intervention can be used within their working context. Therefore, it can encourage the group for the interaction.
A survey is a list of questions to be answered by research participants. Like all research methods, surveys have advantages and disadvantages. A disadvantage to using surveys is that people may not give accurate responses and we would not be able to collect as much information on each person, compared to another research method. Despite these disadvantages, surveys provide psychologists with the ability to gather data from larger samples of people. This advantage allows the data to be generalized to a larger population because the data was conducted from a large and diverse group.
Focusing on surveys and questionnaires, there is a small difference. Questionnaires gather the information from different respondents while a survey is the systematic collection of information from different individuals . Qualitative and quantitative research is the two main functions of research. They both hold different views.
Methods, which provide this type of data, include; interviews, observations as well as focus groups. The advantages of using Qualitative methods such as those listed previously is that they can produce “an extensive base of knowledge” to complex areas of research (Ulin et el. 2005, p.9) such as children’s behavior in school. Another advantage is it will often take place in a natural environment, thus making participants more likely to be more truthful and ther...
It is important to know exactly what a researcher does. A researcher can be found most times researching. Most often researchers look to society to find areas that need to be developed through research (Leedy & Ormrod, 2010). Researchers are problem solvers. They look to find problems that need solutions.
Therefore, one focus group used English as the main language to discuss and the rest five focus groups talked in Chinese. All the record discussions were translated into English in transcribe process.
Data collection is a process by which you receive useful information. It is an important aspect of any type of research, as inaccurate data can alter the results of a study and lead to false hypothesis and interpretations. The approach the researcher utilizes to collect data depends on the nature of the study, the study design, and the availability of time, money and personnel. In addition, it is important for the researcher to determine whether the study is intended to produce qualitative or quantitative information.
Lack of response is the main disadvantage for mail surveys. The group survey is another low cost form, however the individual respondent is interviewed in a group. The disadvantage with group surveys are the logistics of marshaling the respondents to one location and the perception by respondents that grouping posses less anonymity. Electronic surveys are a relatively new addition in survey research and could very well become comparable to the telephone survey. Electronic surveys are advantageous for the low cost as well as ease in delivery. Because the delivery method is through internet, and the general population does not
Qualitative and quantitative research methods take different approaches to gathering and analysing information. Whether it is a qualitative or quantitative study, the research study begins with a question or series of questions. Both use rigorously designed studies to get the most accurate, detailed and complete results. Qualitative studies common methods are interviews, surveys and observation. A qualitative study aims to provide a detailed description of the study results, often using pictures and written descriptions to describe what the research revealed. A qualitative study looks at the big picture, helping researchers to narrow in on points of interest that then can be followed up on in a quantitative study. While a quantitative study has a narrower focus, it attempts to provide a detailed explanation of the study focus, along with this using numbers and statistics. And the results from a quantitative study can reveal bigger questions that call for qualitative study. Or vice versa a qualitative study may reveal at analysis that a more focus and direct approach may be needed. With both methods analysis is a key part of any study whether qualitative or quantitative.