Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction about forgiveness
Elocution on importance of forgiveness
Essay on the enigma of forgiveness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction about forgiveness
To Not Forgive Many people have forgiven others, but do we really have a responsibility to forgive each other? There are many examples of crimes in our society, including: The Holocaust, 9/11, and many more. Although these crimes happened many years ago, the severity of them have been unforgivable. A story that supports this idea is The Sunflower, Exploring Dimensions of Forgiveness, by Simon Wiesenthal. In Simon's story, he explains that he was in a concentration camp when he was called to the hospital. At the hospital, an SS soldier asked him for forgiveness after killing many Jews; which he did not forgive him after his wrongdoings. Another example of not forgiving is a response by Sidney Shachnow to Simons book. Sidney explains that the SS man can not be forgiven, because he murdered everyone that could. People do not always have the responsibility to forgive others for their acts or wrongdoings. In many cases of asking for forgiveness, many people only forgive from feeling remorse of not forgiving. This impacts people's choices a lot when deciding to forgive. In Wiesenthal's book he states,”Ought I have to forgive him? Was my silence at the bedside of a dying Nazi right or wrong?” This shows that after many years, Simon is pitying the soldier only because he was dying. Which, is not good because he was not …show more content…
This idea can be supported by many people who have survived or been through these atrocities. Sidney Shachnow makes a good point of this in a response email to Wiesenthal stating,”But those individuals who were directly and personally involved in these atrocities deserve no mercy.” On the other hand, people think that people should be forgiven no matter the circumstances. This is not right at all because why ask for forgiveness when the person could have avoided the wrongdoing. Or even doing anything to ask to be
In the symposium section, Abraham Joshua Heschel quoted, “No one can forgive crimes committed against other people. It is therefore preposterous to assume that anybody alive can extend forgiveness for the suffering of any one of the six million people who perished.” (171). Simon Wiesenthal would possibly never forgive the SS officer because he doesn’t represents to those who suffer and died by the SS officers because he is just one jewish person out of many different jews that died. At that point, Simon Wiesenthal does not represent the rest of the jews and other Holocaust
Analysis and explanation of Wiesenthal’s actions When Simon was asked to forgive the SS officer, he blankly looked at the man, stood up, and left. One of the main problems that he faced is he definitely was not able to absolve the man of the crimes considering he could not speak for his entire people. Wiesenthal did not have authority to absolve the actions of those who were responsible for the holocaust nor did he want to in the first place. Different people have different ideologies about the way that one can accept forgiveness. Literature from the Jewish culture has a lot to say about this and understandably so.
In Simon Wiesenthal’s The Sunflower, he recounts his incidence of meeting a dying Nazi soldier who tells Simon that he was responsible for the death of his family. Upon telling Simon the details, Karl asks for his forgiveness for what he helped accomplish. Simon leaves Karl without giving him an answer. This paper will argue that, even though Karl admits to killing Simon’s family in the house, Simon is morally forbidden to forgive Karl because Karl does not seem to show genuine remorse for his committed crime and it is not up to Simon to be able to forgive Karl for his sins. This stand will be supported by the meaning of forgiveness, evidence from the memoir, quotes from the published responses to Simon’s moral question, and arguments from Thomas Brudholm, Charles Griswold, and Trudy Govier. The possibly raised objection, for this particular modified situation, of forgiveness being necessary to move on from Desmond Tutu will be countered with the logic of needing to eventually find an end somewhere.
“Yes. I see them plain before my eyes…I can see the child and his father and his mother(Wiesenthal,47).” This heinous act committed by the soldiers Karl served with seemed to haunt him on his death bed. The memory of the families and the cries of innocents burning in that home seems to be one of the main things Karl is asking for forgiveness for. The memories seem to haunt him and before he dies he wants to make peace with the ghost of his life, not wanting to bring them into the afterlife with him. The memories of that event have weighed heavily on Karl’s conscious, and it seems if there were such things as a double take in life he would go back and find a way to help those innocents. Karl has a lot of deaths on his conscious not from acts he committed; however, from acts seen by him or acts that he did not stop. By asking for forgiveness from Wiesenthal Karl wanted to die knowing someone knew he was truly sorry for his actions and was willing to pay for them in the afterlife. Even though Wiesenthal was not a Jew whose Karl’s actions affected, his apology was for the community as an SS
Forgiveness is to stop feeling angry, to stop blaming someone for the way they made a person feel, and stop feeling victims of whatever wickedness was directed towards them. Is forgiveness necessary? Can everyone be forgiven despite the circumstances? If forgiveness depends on the situation, then is it necessary at all? Does forgiveness allow someone to continue their life in peace? Is forgiving someone who causes physical pain to someone, as a pose to forgiving someone who murdered a member of the family the same? If someone can forgive one of these acts so easily can the other be forgiven just as easy? Forgiveness allows for someone to come to terms with what they have experienced. In the case of murder forgiveness is necessary because it allows for someone to be at peace with themselves knowing they no longer have to live with hatred. It also allows someone to begin a new life with new gained experience and different perspectives on life. Forgiveness is necessary from a moral perspective because it allows someone to get rid of hatred and find peace within him or herself to move on with their lives.
“I do not forgive people because I am weak. I forgive them because I am strong enough to understand people mistakes.” (Marilyn Monroe) Simon Wiesenthal was facing a dying Nazi solider who was seeking for forgiveness in his death bed. In the novel, The Sunflower, Simon writes about a situation he confronts in the concentration camp. While arriving at the military hospital to start labor, a nurse approaches Simon and asks him to follow her. When he arrives in the room, he meets Karl, the dying Nazi solider. Karl is asking for forgiveness for the awful crimes he committed while being an SS. He informs Simon he cannot die in peace without being forgiven by a Jew for the awful things he did to the Jewish people. Simon listens to the detailed confession
I stated before about how I would have forgave Karl for his wrongdoing to the Jewish people and others. The Holocaust was a tragic thing and we can all agree to that. When I think of the military, I think about learning respect for your commanding officers and other soldiers and civilians. Karl was commanded to shoot anyone who was trying to escape from the burning house so he listened to his orders when a family did jump. If I was there in Karl 's shoes, I for one would have shot the family when they jumped even though it would have been wrong and I wouldn 't want too. In the symposium responses, Lawrence L. Langer stated, "When we call the murder of a helpless Jewish father and a child a 'wrong, ' we ease the crime into the realm of familiar and forgivable transgressions and relieve ourselves of the burden of facing its utter horror" (188). No matter what word we use to describe the killing of millions of helpless Jews, it will still feel like what Langer
Forgiving someone is a way to release us from the pain they have brought us. Justice can just be
The position to choose between forgiving one’s evil oppressor and letting him die in unrest is unlike any other. The Sunflower by Simon Wiesenthal explores the possibilities and limitations of forgiveness through the story of one Jew in Nazi Germany. In the book, Wiesenthal details his life in the concentration camp, and the particular circumstance in which a dying Nazi asks him for forgiveness for all the heinous acts committed against Jews while under the Nazi regime. Wiesenthal responds to this request by leaving the room without giving forgiveness. The story closes with Wiesenthal posing the question, “What would you have done?” Had I been put in the position that Wiesenthal was in, I would ultimately choose to forgive the Nazi on the basis
I found it interesting to hear two different responses that differ in opinion and are on different sides on this subject matter. My personal belief lands me on Berger’s side of the argument and I agree with his views. While I disagree with the Dalai Lama’s views on this subject matter, I respect and understand his views that are based off of his religion of Buddhism. I do agree with one thing the Dalai Lama stated, a person should be able to forgive in some instances, but certainly not forget because individuals should be aware and remember these experiences like Wiesenthal had to check the reoccurrence of these events in the future/try to prevent them from ever happening again. The Holocaust is a dark age in history that will never escape our minds and events like this have to be talked about/learned to try to prevent them in the future. Wiesenthal was put in the hardest situation because of the fact that he is Jewish and Karl was asking for his forgiveness when he committed horrific acts against fellow Jews like murdering them during the Holocaust. If I were in Wiesenthal’s shoes, I would have done the exact same thing that he did and I certainly would not have been able to ever forgive him no matter what because of the major crimes he committed that were
Forgiveness is not a one time thing it is something you have to deal with all the time. I 've discovered through life that feelings are strong, many people will tell you how you are suppose to feel and also I learned that most people do not want to feel the pain of the event that happened to them repeatedly. In this case we are talking about forgiveness to Karl for the things he did in the holocaust. Though it may be difficult I would say that I forgave him and after he passed away I would have found reasons to truly forgive him.
"Time heals all wounds." is a famous line in American history. I don't think that this is true. My line would be, "Forgiveness heals all wounds." I think that Forgiveness in a very important part of life. Without it, people can not move on with their lives. Let's take for instance a murderer and the family of the person he killed. The murderer may be sentenced to death. The family of the person who was killed could go in and watch the man that killed their family member be put to death. That may give them peace of mind, but they still can not completely move on. They must forgive murderer for killing the person before they can really move on with their lives. Once they do this it will be easier for them. A book that really illustrated this is The Scarlet Letter. In this book there are three main characters, Arthur Dimmesdale, Hester Prynne, and Roger Chillingworth. These three people either needed forgiveness or needed to forgive someone. Some got it, some didn't. Whether or not they received or gave forgiveness had a great impact in their lives.
As a result of permanently forgetting ones wrong doing; forgiveness has to be carried out by both decisional and emotional forgiveness. Otherwise, it is not really true forgiveness. How can one expect to be forgiven by others if one cannot forgive others personally? One is supposed to treat other how they themselves would like to be treated.
The substance of forgiveness is known to be an important thing and concept in the teaching of Jesus. In the Bible, Jesus has made it clear that unforgiveness is known to be a serious sin nurtured in the heart. As per Jesus Christ, it is said that the person needs to be forgiven even if a serious problem is caused due to him. If not, even we would not be forgiven from God. As per Jesus, if you forgive the sin done by the people, your heavenly will also forgive you if you have committed any sin. We would always want the heavenly father to forgive us for whatever wrong things or the mistakes that we do. In fact, we always think that it is the duty of God to forgive us. However, we never consider that the degree of offence we have done. We always think that he is the God and it is his prime duty to forgive us no matter what we do. But if somebody does the same thing to us, we always feel that it is not important to forgive them we think that we should not let them go just by forgiving them. Hence, the most important thing that needs to be considered here by us is that we should learn to forgive people (...
Forgiveness is the act of releasing an offender of any wrong or hurt they may have caused you whether they deserve it or not. It is a decision to let go of resentment or vengeance toward a person or group of people. When we choose to forgive, we’re wiping the slate clean, cancelling a debt, or as I love to say, “Letting it go.” In the Bible, the Greek word for forgiveness literally means to “let it go.” This concept, “forgiveness,” is easier said than done. Majority of people find it very difficult to let go of offenses and hurts caused by others. I really do believe that most people desire to let it go, but we lack the knowledge of how to do it. As believers, we are instructed by God maintain an attitude of forgiveness.