The Avengers, directed by Joss Whedon, is a story of five superheroes coming together to save the world. The last big battle scene takes place in New York, where a big portal has been opened and is letting out thousands of aliens that start terrorizing all of New York. Loki is the villain of the of the movie, who wants to take over Earth. While the five superheroes (who are known as the Avengers) are fighting off Loki and his alien army, The government decides to try and bomb New York. The bombing would have killed thousands of innocents if it weren’t stopped by the Avengers. In the end, the Avengers took down Loki and his army, saving New York and the world. The stimulus made me think about the philosophical question “Is it moral to kill …show more content…
My question stems from the “The trolley problem” which gives a person the imaginary option of pulling a lever to save five people from an oncoming trolley and killing one person or letting the trolley go and kill the five people saving, that one other person. Another way this dilemma is set up is: say you were walking on a bridge with a fat man and you saw that a trolley was coming below you and was about to hit five people but, you knew if you pushed this fat man off the bridge to block the trolley then you could save the five people at the expense of the fat …show more content…
and that we should not give into any “special priorities to ourselves or those dear and near to us.” (para.2). Therefore we should instead “...transcend our our narrow, natural sympathies, and aim to promote the greater good of humanity as a whole or even the good of all sentient beings.” (para.2.). This being brought to attention, I can see where some might argue how, the government from the stimulus has their own agenda’s due to the fact that, the people who make up the government most likely, have loved ones they needed to protect. one could argue that because of this reason the act of bombing New York becomes immoral in the eyes of a utilitarian because, the government from the stimulus was not thinking of the greater good for the rest of the world but, were only thinking of themselves. furthermore, I would argue that it’s hard to really do anything without self- interest coming into play. I would also argue that the one of the biggest reasons that government was created was to protect the people who sought to be governed by it. At the end of the day the government was just doing one of the many things it was built for: making the hard decisions no else really wants to really
Singer’s utilitarian theory points out his main arguments for his statement “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it” (375). He supports this by suggesting that were are morally obligated to prevent bad no matter the “proximity or distance” , “the number of other people who, in respect to that evil, are in the same situation we are” and that we ought to prevent hunger by sacrificing only their luxuries, which are of lesser moral importance (378). This meaning that we shouldn’t limit our aide to only those that we can see or that we know because morally there is no different between our obligation to them and our obligation to those overseas. Also, we should limit our aide to what we think ...
I think government is important, but does not help preserve human society. History has gone throughout time and earlier generations have not had the knowledge and technology that we have today but we have evolved to what we are now without government. I think government is just there to keep everyone in line with laws and our rights and to control terrorism and making big decisions.
So the pursuit of welfare and utility has to be done impartially for everyone in the society no matter whether we believe in a God or not. Secondly it's the utilitatianism's 'consequentialism'.
Declaration of Independence states “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”[5] By this can be concluded that a government is just when before the law all men are equal, That we the people have rights, and it is the role of the government to protect and insure those rights. By establishing a government to fulfill that purpose is to establish justice.
In this assignment we are to determine the moral difference between Deontological moral theory and Utilitarianism with regard to the changing of lives on a chance twist of fate with the brakes blowing out of the Trolley excursion. To turn or not to turn that is the question. Weather it is nobler of the heart and mind to follow the path of one and not the other remains a personal choice.
A study was conducted in which participants were presented with three dilemmas. One dilemma was called the Trolley Dilemma: a trolley is headed toward five people standing on the track. You can switch the trolley to another track killing only one person instead of five. Subjects were asked to decide between right and wrong.
The government will never be perfect, but there are always ways to improve it. The government that exists today in America is becoming more fascist every day. The government is in control of everything: political, social, and economic issues No one should ever trust a system in which throughout history has stolen land from the natives and have taken part in genocide. The United States has become a place full of corporate greed and profit. Profit over people, profit over lives, profit over morals. The government is the host to capitalism, which only leads to conformist enslavement.
John Adams stated that “Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it.” Federalists believed this, and fought verbal and written battles against the Anti-Federalists, who disagreed with John Adams. Anti-Federalists believed that in an elite democracy, the elite’s would get greedy and selfish, and only worry about themselves. As I’m on the Federalist side, I believe that John Adams was correct in his statement, and that the government is only trying to uphold the rights and liberties that each citizen ought to have.
One of the ideologies of America was that the best government was a small government. Our country was founded by settlers who wanted to get out of the grasp of Great Britain rule. These settlers wanted to have the natural rights that they felt were guaranteed to them by god. The Declaration of Independence was written to declare that the thirteen colonies were claiming themselves as independent states. Then U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights were written. These important papers spell out freedoms guaranteed to Americans and the laws that protect those freedoms. They talk of a government that works for the people.
In the article, The Masked Avengers, by David Kushner, Kushner describes and goes into detail about the life of a man named, Christopher Doyon. Kushner starts his article with the childhood of Doyon and how he became involved with hacking groups early in his life. Doyon’s mother passed away when he was a child and he grew up with an abusive father. At fourteen years old, Doyon left his abusive home and moved to Cambridge, Massachusetts where he joined his first hacker group called the Tech Model Railroad Club. Although Doyon was very into computers and hacking groups, he was not a skilled coder. He felt that he was more of an activist and that using computers and technology was his way to get his point across.
In Suicide Squad, the author uses the archetypes Good vs. Evil,tyrant, hero, mentor, and the traitor to reveal that we as humans fall to evil when we are independent, but we can accomplish more if we work as a team for good instead of evil. We can relate to this theme in the movie when the villains were evil by themselves, but they collaborated to use their power for good. This Theme relates to the whole story.
The Bystander at the Switch case is a fundamental part of Thomson’s argument in “Trolley Problem.” The basis of her paper is to explain the moral difference between this case, which she deems morally permissible (1398), and the Transplant case, which she deems morally impermissible (1396). In the Bystander at the Switch case, a bystander sees a trolley hurtling towards five workers on the track and has the option of throwing a switch to divert the trolley’s path towards only one worker. Thomson finds the Bystander at the Switch case permissible under two conditions:
In their graphic novel Watchmen, Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons establish their story during the Cold War period, when a group of superheroes tackle the task to save humanity from a potential World War III caused by tensions among governmental powers. Managed by the intelligence of Adrian Veidt, the worst was avoided after the attack of alien forces causes the death of millions of New Yorkers that leads to a temporary world peace. The representations of the Watchmen superheroes of Moore and Gibbons, particularly Rorschach, display the concept of heroism being a part of the real world, among the regular public of our society.
One interesting thing about the movie is that each of the main characters have a unique goal in the film, but they are all able to work together. Each character has a different back story and role in the context of the film. Thor and Black Widow are fearless leaders, Hulk and Captain America are heroes that are haunted by personal issues, and Iron Man is the comic relief. They all join the team at different times for different reasons. Black Widow is called in to help recruit Bruce Banner, Captain America and Iron Man are approached in person, and Thor joins because he has a connection to the mission. Hawkeye is with Nick Furry from the start, but is under Loki’s control for a majority of the movie. They all go through their own struggles, but they support each other through it,
... which the act is done does matter to them. Utilitarianism is very vulnerable in this regard. A case where some people’s happiness is created at the cost of a few may not always be ethical. Opposition may say that “Someone always is left out in this theory” but I argue that this is always the case.