Differences Of Doublepeak

732 Words2 Pages

The words, “Political language… is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind” were said by George Orwell. Similarly, the essays “The World of Doublespeak” and “The Ways We Lie” from William Lutz and Stephanie Ericsson point out the distinct types of doublespeak and lies. Doublespeak and lies have many differences regarding their purpose, form, and consequence. Nowadays, people tend to pretend others by manipulating words to be dishonest or making them sound inversely. Lutz believes that doublespeak assists to effectively misleads the public. On the other hand, Ericsson believes that when people lie, they should think about it one more time before lying to someone. However, without knowing the ability to know when they are being used, one would struggle to know anything about the truth. In Willian Lutz’s essay, “Doublespeak,” he begins by defining …show more content…

For example, if a plane gets crashed, then the airline company would not tell the public that it was their fault that they didn’t check whether the engines of the plane are working properly or not. Instead, they would say that when the plane was in a sky, the bird hit the engine, and cause the engine to fail. However, if the company used a lie, it would be able to tell the public that nothing happened on that day. In fact, lies aren’t used by big companies because they have a fear of being caught. While, lies are used in a several ways, such as to get out of trouble or to compliment someone. Also, people lie to hide something or to give a false impression. A lie is not only a different explication, but it is a fully different answer from the truth. However, lies are simply false facts. Therefore, it is mandatory for people to know the differences between doublespeak and lies. Also, one must have the ability to know when they are being used, so they cannot face any problem in identifying the

Open Document