Differences In Thomas Jefferson's Draft

471 Words1 Page

There are many differences between the approved draft and the draft proposed by Jefferson. Most of these differences just exist from the approved draft cutting out a lot of what Jefferson had written. Word choice can also be noted, as in some places the only change was the word in the particular sentence. Another notable difference is that in the approved draft it sounds as though they just wish to resolve their issues and go on with life, not gain independence. It isn’t until the end that it is clear that they are seeking freedom fully, while in Jefferson's draft it is evident early on that cutting ties completely is the goal. The approved draft also uses colonies as their title, while Jefferson calls them states. To me, these differences …show more content…

Some of the things on this list include that the king is a tyrant, he won't allow them to govern and make laws for themselves, he won't allow them to grow and gain more land, he forces them to take care of his soldiers but won't get justice for the colonists when the soldiers commit crimes, he has cut the colonies off from the rest of the world in terms of trade, he imposes taxes without their consent, forces them to have unfair trials overseas, and won't provide protection for them. Jefferson also talks about how they are founded on freedom, and the king is denying them that and all of their rights, so therefore it is their right instead to break away from the mother country. If I was a colonist I would for sure find Jefferson's arguments convincing. Jefferson didn’t make up all the issues he listed, and colonists had to live and deal with the issues on a daily basis, so I am sure it wouldn’t be hard to look at his declaration and agree with it. The king wasn’t taking care of the colonies like he should have and having all of the issues in one location to read makes it seem even worse, so to me that would be even more

Open Document