Differences Between One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest Book And Movie

649 Words2 Pages

Change is necessary in life, without change the world would become a very dull place with very little interest being arisen. However, change within the film One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest by Milos Forman is one that only makes the film an un-credible source for accurate depiction of the book. The film with high critical acclaim is consistently flawed by a change of perspective from the book to one of which the director interprets it to be. Due to these reasons , the film represents a successful adaptation of the book which is skewed by a biased opinion on the events that occur within the ward and how one man’s opinion can alter the perspective for all viewers because the differences in representation of characters causes an untrustworthy point …show more content…

In One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, a major issue that governs the lack of credibility of its perspective is the differences in characters from book and film. In the opinion of John Zubizarreta “Kesey's novel is written from the unstable perspective of the paranoid schizophrenic Indian who is not much more than an auxiliary character in the movie. The novel's unreliable narrative voice results in tangled verbal ambiguity, but in the film, McMurphy is protagonist and hero, and the viewer's sympathy is engaged by the character's roustabout charm and apparently sacrificial motive to "cure" the other patients of their respective ailments. In the novel, Mack offers only a tenuous salvation perceived dimly through Chief's foggy paranoia and schizophrenic dementia. Ultimately, the reader ponders the reality of the entire narrative, the efficacy of McMurphy's heroism, and the validity of Chief's exuberant escape from the ward, issues not at

Open Document