Difference Between Socialisation, Personal Identity And Gender Identity

821 Words2 Pages

Socialisation, Personal identity, Gender Identity and Gender Roles:
Boundless.com defines ‘Socialisation’ as “a term used to refer to the lifelong process of inheriting and disseminating norms, customs and ideologies providing the individual with the skills and habits necessary for precipitating within one’s society, thus the means by which social and cultural continuity are attained” (Boundless.com, 2015). The process of socialisation involves an individual such as an adolescent to have interactions with various agents of socialisation. Agents of socialisation are factors that play a crucial role in providing an individual with social and cultural skills in accordance with the social norms and standards of the society one is located in (Brian …show more content…

The American Psychological Association states, the ideology of identity requires two concepts. The first concept being ‘self-conception’ which is various perceptions an individual has of themselves. For example, an adolescent’s belief of their attributes, roles, religion and values contributes to its personal identity (American Psychological Association, 2002). Secondly, the concept of ‘Self- esteem’ which is the process of self-evaluation, additionally an implication of this concept can be seen through an adolescent’s personality, whether there confident or shy (American Psychological Association, 2002). Gender Identity involves an individual’s perception of his or hers gender which usually correlates with ascribed status such as sex (Morrow, Lori Messinger and hrc.org, 2006). Gender Roles are excepted behaviours belonging to each sex (Brian Furze, 2014) which is related to gender binaries, which stipulates individuals of each sex to conform to the ideologies of masculinity and femineity (Jack David Eller, Culture and Diversity in the United States 2015). There is a clear connection between socialisation and gender identity in regards with adolescence, …show more content…

During Erikson’s work from 1950-1963 he added modifications to Freud’s findings resulting in a proposition of a psychoanalytic theory of psychosocial development that occurs over a human’s lifespan and encompasses all life stages of human development; infancy (birth to 18 months), early childhood (2 to 3 years), preschool (3 to 5 years), school age (6 to 11 years), adolescence (12 to 18 years), young adulthood (19 to 40 years), middle adulthood (40 to 65 years) and maturity 65 to death) (simplypsychology.org). Each stage has a positive or negative outcome based off when the human experiences a psychosocial crisis in which results one’s personality development. Erikson based his findings off the term, ‘crisis’. He used the term for different implications of each human development stage. Once a ‘crisis’ is implied to one’s life, the formation of identity is based on the results that how one deals with the crisis or internal conflicts that emerges in each stage of life. In regards to the Adolescence stage of life, Erikson characterised this period of the life cycle as the establishment of one’s sense of personal identity. In the adolescence stage individuals face the fifth crisis, ‘Identity vs Role Confusion. This crisis involves an adolescent’s search of a sense of identity. The formation of a ‘sense of identity’ occurs when an adolescent successfully finds

Open Document