Balancing Apollonian and Dionysian Lifestyles: A Study of Zorba the Greek

1375 Words3 Pages

The importance of maintaining a balanced lifestyle will allow one to achieve the most worthwhile existence. Nikos Kazantzakis’ Zorba the Greek dramatizes the significance of balance between the Apollonian and Dionysian dichotomy, through the characterization of the contrasting protagonists, Boss and Zorba. Kazantzakis typifies the differences amid the philosophical ideologies through the comparison of Boss and Zorba’s beliefs. Moreover, he represents Boss by his willingness to try to improve oneself and live more like Zorba. Through the progression of their journey, Zorba’s Dionysian lifestyle becomes a primary influence to Boss and begins to alter his perspectives on the true meaning of life. Throughout the novel, Kazantzakis outlines the …show more content…

The novel is also written in first person from Boss’ perspective, therefore readers are given more insight to his approach towards life. Nevertheless, it is discovered that Boss is personally appalled by his own lifestyle. “If only I could live again the moment of that anger which surged up in me when my friend called me a bookworm! I recalled then that all my disgust at the life I had been leading was personified in those words” (8). The characterization of Boss’ self-discovery propels him to embark on a journey of uncovering the true purpose of life, which he believes is represented by Zorba’s philosophies. Kazantzakis specifically portrays Boss’ being as one who attempts to escape the principles of the Apollonian nature, hence he looks up to Zorba for his embodiment of the Dionysian lifestyle. Moreover, Kazantzakis depicts Boss’ strive to alter his principles as a way of symbolizing the notion of trying to achieve balance between the ideologies. “I felt, as I listened to Zorba, that the world was recovering its pristine freshness….Water, women, the stars, bread, returned to their mysterious, primitive origin and the divine whirlwind burst once more upon the air” (51). Once Boss begins opening himself to the art of living through one's passions, he is able to further pursue a life reflected by the Dionysian concepts. Kazantzakis …show more content…

Zorba, who exemplifies the procreation of Dionysus, the Greek god of wine and festivities, only behaves in the pursuit of pleasure. Kazantzakis suggests that once Boss gives up the manuscript, he will be able to adopt the ideas from the Dionysian culture. “I wrote all day and the more I wrote the freer I felt. My feelings were mixed: relief, pride, disgust. But I let myself be absorbed by the work, for I knew that as soon as I had finished this manuscript and had bound and sealed it I should be free” (83). For Boss, the manuscript symbolized an object which is associated with the Apollonian lifestyle, therefore when he finally renounces it; it signifies a change in philosophies. Kazantzakis depicts Boss as one who will never truly attain a life-loving entity, his analysis of the difference between the dichotomy provides the idea of trying to find a midpoint between the opposing philosophies. Zorba says to Boss, “All those who actually live the mysteries of life haven’t the time to write, and all those who have the time don’t live them! D’you see? (235) This is ironic since at the end of the novel Boss continues to write in the book instead of going out to live instinctively. Despite Boss’ best efforts to overcome his intellectual instincts, it is in his nature that he continues to harbour the Apollonian traits. Although Zorba’s

Open Document