Superman II (1980), directed by Richard Lester, the continuation of Superman: The Movie (1978), is a film that tells the tale of Superman’s identity, romantic relationship and battle for the greater good. The film follows Superman as he progresses his romantic relationship with Lois Lane, unaware of the three Krytonian criminals’, General Zod, Ursa and Non, insidious agenda. In conjunction with the three criminals, Lex Luthor escapes from prison determined to destroy Superman once and for all—only furthering the obstacles and tribulations Superman must combat. In Robert Jewett and John Lawrence’s article, Heroes and Superheroes, they explain that there are several types of religious heroes and heroines. It is proposed that these various categories include “Initiatory Heroes,” “Ordinary …show more content…
To begin, in accordance to the text, Jewett and Lawrence state “to sustain [people’s] faiths, world religions often celebrate stories of heroic testing, expecting that sympathetic audiences will emulate heroic acts.” In the circumstance of Superman II (1980), the Judeo-Christian value of virginity is heavily emphasized in the film. Hence, this may be interpreted as once Clark Kent and Lois Lane engage in premarital sex, “horrifying consequences” ensue. Thus, by illustrating the horrific consequences of premarital sex and succumbing to temptation, the film utilizes fear mongering in order to encourage celibacy. For example, as Clark Kent’s dual-identity as Superman becomes increasingly difficult to hide from his love interest, Lois Lane, an accidental
" The hero within: Six archetypes we live by.
A hero is considered to be any man noted for feats of courage or nobility of purpose;
Who is a hero? In contemporary times, usage of the term has become somewhat of a cliché. Over the years, the term “hero” has become representative of a wide variety of individuals, each possessing differing traits. Some of the answers put forth by my colleagues (during our in-class discussion on heroism) as to whom they consider heroes pointed to celebrities, athletes, teachers and family members. Although the occupations differed, each of their heroes bore qualities that my classmates perceived as extraordinary, whether morally or physically. Nonetheless, Webster’s defines “hero” as “a person who is admired for great or brave acts or fine qualities.” Thus, it is worth considering that individuals become heroes relative to the situation with which they’re faced.
Batman and Superman are superheroes whose qualities are exaggerated in a way that is reminiscent of the gods and heroes in The Odyssey. In Fact, the superheroes from comic books emerge from the epic tradition. Epics, as you know, celebrate the great deeds of one or more legendary heroes. This epic hero is generally involved with a quest to overcome hardship, and he (and it usually is a "he") succeeds. The hero performs superhuman exploits in battle, often saving or founding a nation or the human race itself. Sound familiar? And even in terms of the superhero's body, with his bulging muscles and larger‐than‐life qualities, such figures evoke the images of Baroque masculinity. What Becomes important in these retellings, then, is how the hero makes the journey, how he faces his obstacles, and what he learns in the process.
With reference to “Man of Steel” and “Superman 1”, Superman is much taller than Lois resulting in her constantly having to look up at him and having him shot with a low angle from the point-of-view shot of Lois Lane, having the effect of Superman seeming more powerful. Superman’s adoptive mother is also a stereotypical, stay at home mother while his adoptive father
Is this film about Superman or about a mysterious bearded man who protects people once in every decade of his lifetime? One problem that the film has lies within the first hour of the movie - in which the film, having up to that point not yet really established Superman as a hero. Opposed to the original Superman in which Superman would be fully developed within the first scene of the movie. In addition to his powers being fully developed, Superman would have already established his arch nemesis as well. This course of action took way to long, and while understanding that the director wanted a firm background of Clark Kent as well as Kal-El this action could have been more upfront. In Man of Steel Clark Kent should have transformed into Superman and shown the world who he really is and...
In “The Thematic Paradigm”, Robert Ray explains the principles and significance of the official hero. An official hero “embodies the best attributes of adulthood: sound reasoning and judgment, wisdom and sympathy based on experience” (452). Official heroes
So what defines one as a hero? Well, a definition of what a hero is “A person noted for special achievement in a particular field” (hero, n.d). Our concept of a hero alters drastically from person to
On one end of the spectrum lays Superman, an alien who from birth is comparable to god, and on the opposite side lays Lex Luthor, a genius human who comes from nothing and created a financial empire. Superman
From classical fable stories, to historical documentation the image of a hero circulates around the notion of being a great conquer. The word conquer derives from a person having the ability to take or rule over many people with force. The foundation of the majority of the world comes from a historical battle’s that took place-causing devastation amongst divided groups of people. The bases of many conflicts amongst divided groups of people are cultural beliefs, which shun other cultures on how they should conduct their lives. These ideal key points of the power of religion emerge stories of a single individual who stick out through time as being iconic champions. Having the ability to be stronger, faster or even smarter
Throughout history, there have always been heroes. Those strong-willed, brave individuals who perform courageous acts for fame and glory are prevalent in most cultures.. Societies have these heroes as standards of their cultures’ moral codes. Every society has their own definition of these codes are, so a unifying definition of hero can be hard to achieve. However, Philip Zimbardo says “Simply put, then, the key to heroism is a concern for other people in need—a concern to defend a moral cause, knowing there is a personal risk, done without expectation of reward.” With this basic definition, I will be examining various epic heroes I’ve studied throughout the course of my senior year for characteristics. From the copious amounts of studying, I’ve deduced that Achilles, Odysseus, Aeneas, Socrates, Gilgamesh, Beowulf, and Arthur all have characteristics that make them heroic.
Norman, Vera. "Four Conceptions of the Heroic." Fellowship of Reason. N.p., 2005. Web. 29 May 2014.
...teristics and literary devices. The general archetypical description of a hero follows an outline of a muscular figure and super abilities. Yet on the contrary, in myths, heroes may not possess any of those traits. Whether the so-called hero is learning their lesson, overcoming struggle or even descending into darkness, all heroes share some similar and almost identical characteristics. A vast majority of all mythological heroes share the same basic idea which, helps audiences identify whether or not the character is indeed a hero or not. From story to myth or fairytale to drama, the hero is one character who changes the plot entirely. Whether that hero may be saving a burning building, or discovering who they are themselves, our heroes all give us hopes and dreams that one day even our worth will be recognized by ourselves and others as our admirable hero’s are.
In all stories and movies, there a set number of different archetypes. In a sentence, heroes contribute to the society's necessary business of reproducing itself and its values. For most of history, religion has been the main force of reproducing the dominant society's traits by using mythical figures to