1. What are some skills an actor must possess?
According to the text, some skills that an actor should have are the ability to generate a sense of excitement from the audience, the ability to invoke a sense of fear in seemingly dangerous situations, physical attractiveness, and the ability to keep the audience’s attention by being fully committed to the work being performed (Cohen 78).
2. Describe the “declamatory” style of acting (“outside/in” acting).
Cohen explains that the declamatory style of acting can be made up of acting from the outside, such as in a presentational performance, or from the inside, such as in a representational performance (Cohen 68). The main difference between outside and inside acting is that in outside acting, the
…show more content…
4. Who was Konstantin Stanislavsky and why was his work with Anton Chekov at the Moscow Art Theatre important to acting?
Konstantin Stanislavsky was a Russian theatre artist who was highly focused on creating a way for actors to act more naturally, using their own unique experiences to enhance the emotions they portrayed onstage (Cohen 73). According to Cohen’s text, Stanislavsky’s work with Anton Chekov, who was a playwright from Russia, heavily influenced the world of acting because his insightful approach to acting was widely embraced by many performers, especially in the United States (Cohen 73).
5. Describe briefly each of the following “method training” approaches.
• The “Magic If”: The magic if is when an actor uses their own reaction to an event or circumstance as if they were living it in real life, as opposed to trying to mimic how a character would react (Cohen
Acting is seen in your everyday life, whether it be on a tv, in a movie theatre, on a stage, or even in person! Acting goes as far back as 500 B.C. when it was used for the same thing it is today, entertainment. It still goes by the same basic rules, yet it has changed some. I’ve always loved the thought of being an actress on the big stage, so I thought this would be the perfect time to figure out if this is what I really want, or possibly make me want it even more.
Chekhov is part of a non-typical category of artists, because he did not believe in his genius, on the contrary, there is evidence that he believed that his work will not conquer time and posterity. Spectacular, just like Russia at the border between the 19th and 20th century, Chekhov was born the son of serfs in 1860 ( Tsar Alexander will abolish serfdom in 1861) only to become a landlord 32 years later, and a neighbor of Prince Shakovskoi. He bought the Melikhovo estate (unconsciously imitating Tolstoy, the patriarch of Iasnaia Polyana), not far from Moscow, with 13 thousand rubles of which he has paid an advance of five thousand. Chekhov is the true precursor of the theater of the absurd.
If you were to ask any person what acting was, they would most likely give you an answer along the lines of: portraying the life of another person, talking and acting like a character, bringing a fictional or representational character to life. While actors may appear to be inseparable with their characters while one is watching them perform, once they go home and take off the stage makeup, they change; Mark Ruffalo is no longer a 10-foot green monster, and Bradley Cooper is not a sadistic bionic raccoon. However, Konstantin Stanislavski, a Russian actor and writer of the late 19th and early 20th century, felt as if these actors should adopt the characteristics of their character as best they can in order to be able to actually become the characters
The Most Useful Aspects of Stanisalvski's System Stanislavski was a Russian theatre practitioner who disliked the melodramatic style of acting that was popular at that time in Russia. Stanislavski embarked on a quest for truth in his art and devoted his life to that journey. Stanislavski method required actors to experience the feeling of living the life of another human. The basis was that actors must believe everything that is happening on stage.
The delivery of my speech portrays a sense of calmness and seriousness. I used this style of speaking to show the importance of my subject, lack of organ donors. Throughout the presentation I used note cards as a guide and frequently made eye contact with my audience. When giving facts that I felt were important I made sure to look at the camera to show there significance. I also added my input into some of the facts to try and convince my listeners to become organ donors
Stanislavski: Uncensored and Unabridged discusses how the late theatre director and actor, Constantin Stanislavski, not only wrote about his ideas that would help bring characters to life and demand total commitment from his student actors, but he also practiced them. Within his many method books for acting such as An Actor Prepares, Building a Character, and My Life for Art, he would discuss the ways in which an actor should genuinely create the living soul of said character.
In Sharon Carnicke’s article Stanislavsky: Uncensored and Unabridged, she discusses her thoughts on the actual image of Stanislavsky compared to the idea that everyone has of him. As she mentions in her article, He was writing during a time of massive censorship. At this time in Russia philosophy and spirituality were cast to the side while materialism and behaviorism became the focus of Russian society. It is be-cause of these censorships that the idea of Stanislavsky that we have today may perhaps be slightly askew from the actual person and his ideas.Carnicke expresses her interest in Stanislavsky’s My Life an Art because the new version being released and translated has uncensored, unedited writing fromStanislavsky himself. While it is
Jake Amador Ortiz Professor Alan Wade Beginning to Acting 20 March 2016 Research Paper Rough Draft Constantin Stanislavski was a Russian stage actor and director who developed the performing technique known as method acting. Stanislavski was born Konstantin Sergeyevich Alekseyev in Moscow, Russia in 1863. He was born into a wealthy family that had a love for acting, his grandmother was a French actress and his father constructed a stage on the family’s estate. His love for acting developed from his family passing down their passion, he was a teen when he started acting and directing. At the age of 14 he gave himself the stage name Stanislavski, which was the name of an actor he had met around that time.
'Remember there are no small parts, only small actors. Stanislavski was a man who thought that an actor should not just read the lines that are infront of him, but should become the character they are inhabiting and make him real. Stanislavski’s real name was Konstantin Sergeyevich Alexeyev but he adopted the stage name of Stanislavski in 1884. Stanislavski’s real name was Konstantin Sergeyevich Alexeyev but he adopted the stage name of Stanislavski in 1884.
In conclusion to this essay we can say that Stanislavski’s system in the training of the actor and the rehearsal process is effective. The system helps actors to break down their characters gradually and really know the role. Some may even the say that the system helps them to almost become the character. The system has played a significant part in theatre training for many years. It has been used, adapted and interpreted by several practitioners, actors and tutors. For many years to come Stanislavski’s system will still be used in theatre training. Not only is it an effective system it is the past, present and future of theatre training and the rehearsal process.
He accepted and embraced the fact that theatre is an artificial construct, and his goal became to achieve what Whyman calls ‘a stylised theatricality; the rejection of what he said was Stanislavski’s naturalism and the need to find another way to achieve the theatre of mood. He had a different approach to motion than that envisaged by Stanislavski’s emphasis on the subconscious, emotional memory, and the feeling of truth. He wanted the actor to be a trained and conscious artist, rather than one hypnotising and hypnotised by feeling.’ (Whyman, 2008:
Stanislavski believed in ensemble acting and wanted to take theatre away from the idea of having a star, to create as near to naturalism as possible. (1)
Based on the works of the Russian Director Konstantin Stanislavski, Lee Strasberg developed a new approach on acting, the so called method, and a “renaissance” (5) in acting in America began. I will claim that Strasberg’s method, including relaxation, concentration, sense and emotional memory revolutionized acting through including the actor’s personal experiences in order to form an authentic inner and outer character. As already mentioned, is relaxation crucial for Strasberg’s method in order to make full use of the actor’s capacity. According to Strasberg relaxation is “the heads and tails of the coin of acting” (5). In order to achieve a symbiosis of physical and mental unblockedness the actor has to work according to
The skills that I am referring to are Oral and Written Communication, Interpersonal, and Teamwork skill. These sets of skills have been identified US dept of Labor and other universities and learning Centers as the essential skills every person needs.
Acting can easily be broken down into three different kinds: stage acting, screen acting, and being a movie star. Each category of acting is very different from one another, with each one having very different requirements. Stage and screen acting have the most differences, while being a movie star is more of a subtype of screen acting.