Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender and language psychological perspective
Gender and language psychological perspective
Gender differences in communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender and language psychological perspective
Deborah Tannen, a linguistics and renowned professor discusses in, “How Men and Female Students Communicate”, the many unique ways that men and female students in her classes talk. In addition, Tannens primary focus is discussing why her female students are less vocal than her male students. Tannen argues that women do better in groups of the same gender. Furthermore, Tannen claims that later on in life, females do better if they went to a school that is female only. Her reasoning behind this is because she believes that men in particular have an advantage of speaking in classes. (Tannen 369-370) In the classes that Tannen taught, she noticed that men openly discuss and debate discussion questions, contrary, the females in her class are
Sommers begins her view on girls scouring higher than boys by expressing that girl students are moving ahead of boys. She appeals to the mournful emotions of the audience that she and many researchers get to the bottom of what the scores are between the two genders. She joins in this time of expressing in order to explain “scholars should be more concerned about the boys who never show up for the tests they need if they
Certain types of behaviors are categorized as masculine or feminine.” She is stating the fact that in different country they are still treated the same. She also says, that in school they are treat in treated way cause how they want them to be and act on how they should be acting and this is also stated my fact that they are still stereotyping gender
It says, “would result in warm and continued relationship with men, a sense of maternity, interest in caring for children, and the capacity to work productively and continuously in female occupations.” (429, Devor) I believe that gender shapes how we behave and relate to one another. Devor explains that by using an educational approach, describing gender stereotypes, and making cultural references. These rhetorical devices serve his larger goal of getting readers to reflect on how their childhoods formed their genders.
Today, women and men are more socially equal then 1993 when Tannen had written this short essay. Through these twenty years women have accomplished many things in different areas that set them equal to the supposedly inferior, men. In my opinion there is no unmarked human being. You are marked by just saying you are male or that you are female. Men are marked just like women are just a little more discreet. I feel that men are noticeably marked in areas where they are the minority. In Tannen’s short essay she says “Some years ago I was at a small working conference of four women and eight men.” We can infer out of the group that the men were the majority and the women were the minority. Also that there was some bias in the information she shared. This is why I assumed Tannen moved towards the women in her observation because they were the minority. When people are the minorities they tend to be looked at differently and marked as so. For instance nursing and secretary jobs are held by more women than men. When you see a male nurse or a male secretary, he is marked. He is the one out of all the female nurses who is marked because he is the minority. It is vice versa for women as well. For example in politics and construction where men are dominating those work areas. You see a female governor or construction worker, you know that she is marked because she is the minority in this
Do men and women effectively communicate in the same way, or is it just a conversation of misunderstanding? There is constantly a new interest in whether men and women converse successfully. Professor and journalist, Deborah Tannen writes, “Sex, Lies, and Conversation: Why Is It So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other?” Tannen compares and contrasts all conversational styles, and explains how the expectation of dialogue affects how men and women converse. Tannen focuses on the subject of marriage and the imbalance of interest between male and female couples. The contrasting perspective however comes from, Deborah Cameron, author of, “What Language Barrier”. Cameron conveys that the stereotypes left upon male and female communication
It gave the readers plenty of opportunities to think of different angles. I began considering not only how I thought I talked, but analyzing how other women talked. After reading, "Women Talk Too Much", it made me analyze my own experiences along with the shocking realization that teachers do not know how biased they are being, as described by the Australian researcher, and pondered strategies on how teachers may use to combat
Lieberman, Simma. “Differences in Male and Female Communication Styles” Simma Lieberman Associates (undated). Retrieved February 25, 2010<
With the ongoing issue for women’s rights, it is important to teach the younger generations to accept the differences in gender and to treat everyone as equals. Although people gravitate towards single gender schools because of it allows students to connect easier as a family, the segregation of genders may cause a rift between gender equality. A study by Liben, a university psychologist, and her graduate student Lacey Hilliard, found that highlighting gender promotes stereotyped views in children as young as 3 (Novotney). By teaching children to close the gender gap at an early age, it can decrease gender inequality. Also, reports claim that female students in single gender schools are less likely to consider science or computer based classes, also known as,“boys classes” (Yates). Co-ed schools on the other hand, allow boys and girls to interact together meaningfully and learn to gravitate away from the common image of gender roles. A 1998 study shows that, “[g]irls at the coeducational schools tended to take more science courses and do better in the college admission process. Statistical analysis from her study shows that graduates of coeducational schools were more likely than graduates of all-girls ' schools to have careers in law, computers, scientific research, and psychology” (“Coeducation at WT”). Not only do co-ed schools teach gender equality, but they also allow females to
Communication, as a social behaviour, is shaped differently for every individual based on their social and cultural experiences. People possess varying linguistic preferences from directness to word choice that make it hard to accurately decipher what another may be trying to convey. Through her studies, Tannen has observed that boys and girls may develop different linguistic styles, as children generally interact with others of the same sex. Her research has shown that “girls tend to learn conversational rituals that focus on the rapport dimension of relationships whereas boys tend to learn rituals that focus on the status dimension” (1995, p.140).
In “His Talk, Her Talk," Joyce Maynard writes about the different characteristics of men’s talk, and women’ talk. She based her research on her experience that happened between her and her family. Joyce Maynard brings out the theory of man and aggression, woman and submission, man and intellect, woman and instinct. Even though, there i...
“Men come from Mars, Women came from Venus”. Is this quote true? Males and Females have a lot in common, but they are definitely not identical. They are different in many ways, one of them being the language used in face-to-face interaction. Men and Women have very different traits, which separate them from one another such as how assertive they are in conversations, their choice of vocabulary when speaking, and also how talkative they are. In this essay, I will seek to examine and explain the reasons behind these differences and critically analyse how they relate to my society.
While females are more likely to, “adopt a strategy of “silent protest” after they have been interrupted” (170). According to Maltz and Borker, men’s dominance in conversation goes along with their dominance in society. In society men, typically, are seen as the more dominant gender over women (170). This also applies to inside the classroom as more men tend to speak out and do more of the talking than women. Most of the time teachers view interaction and participation as a very important part of their student’s ability to succeed. According to Deborah Tannen, author of “How Male and Female Students Use Language Differently” in many classrooms, for learning tools teachers use the debate like format when discussing topics. Tannen writes that teachers would have the students read an article and break it down, and discuss it as a group. Although the debate format does work for men, it does not appeal in some cases to females. In her work, Tannen points out that, English
This experiment, even though it was conducted on a small scale, shows the changing gender roles that are being modified today by the upcoming generation. Although the students still had bits and pieces of gender stereotypes, they more so focused on the activities that Confederate A and Experimenter 1 stated they . Also, once they were all collectively in a group and they saw the jobs being written on the whiteboard, they realized various jobs that “were sexist.” The aggregate data shows that cooperatively students in this particular classroom had underlying gender roles, but were able to pick these roles out once seen. So even though they did have some stereotypical tendencies, this experiment demonstrated that their generation are moving past these gender
Tannen, D., 1990. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow.
The book An Intorduction of Sociolinguistics is an outstanding introductary book in the field of sociolinguistics. It encompasses a wide range of language issues. In chapter 13, Wardhaugh provides a good insight to the relationship between language and gender. He explains gender differences of language-in-use with concise examples. Wardhaugh riases questions about sexist language and guides readers to look closer at how people use language differently because of their own gender in daily life. According to the Whorfian hypothesis, which indicates that the way people use language reflects their thoughts, different genders adapt different communication strategies.