Death Penalty Persuasive Essay

1442 Words3 Pages

The death penalty, many may argue that it is right, while others argue that it is wrong. Should the death penalty be abolished? Some of the main issues that arise with the death penalty are that it’s cruel and unusual, expensive, and we’re punishing criminals for killing by killing. Although these are valid arguments, the death penalty shouldn’t be abolished because criminals deserve to be properly punished. The death penalty is punishment for criminals that commit the most heinous, atrocious of crimes. There are currently thirty-two states that have the death penalty… and eighteen states that do not have the death penalty (Derek). According to a poll conducted by Huffington Post, they found that sixty-two percent of Americans favor the death penalty for people convicted of murder and the other twenty-six percent said they are opposed …show more content…

Criminals should be sentenced the death penalty only for murders – not all murders – serial killings, murders of multiple victims, and sexual tortures. He also states that by sentencing criminals the death penalty, we are sparing other people from being killed, raped, or seriously harmed (Death Penalty). Marquis is stating that not everyone needs to be sentenced the death penalty. If one stole a piece of candy from the grocery store for example, they shouldn’t be sentenced to death whereas if one murdered a human being, we need to put them to the death penalty. Penn Jillette, who is against the death penalty, states that personal pain and biblical tradition are not enough reason to kill a human being (Death Penalty). Jillette is essentially saying that it does not matter how hurt the victim or the victims’ families are, that is not enough reason to kill someone. Immanuel Kant, one who was for the death penalty, believes that it’s one for one. In other words Kant believes that if you are found guilty of murder, your life must also be

Open Document