The Controversy Surrounding The Death Penalty

1093 Words3 Pages

The death penalty is a punishment of execution given to someone who has legally been convicted of a horrible crime. In the United States, the death penalty has been one of the most hotly debated issues. Some people believe that the death penalty is not effective in reducing crime, costs a whole lot more than life in prison, and risks executions of innocent people. While others believe that the death penalty is a punishment that should be served to every human being who committed a serious crime.
The first established death penalty laws date as far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes (Death Penalty Information Center). In that time they believe that death should be the punishment for all crimes. The death sentences were broken …show more content…

Many people would assume that shortening someone's life would be way cheaper than paying for it until the person dies naturally. In research it is actually cheaper to imprison someone for life than to execute them. In fact, studies show that it is actually ten times cheaper. In Georgia, they do not keep costs on death penalty. As a result, some estimate that it costs U.S. taxpayers between $50 and $90 million dollars more per year, depending on the jurisdiction, to prosecute death penalty cases than life sentences ( HGExperts). In Fact, Death penalty trials are more expensive for a lot of other reasons. They will need money to hire additional attorneys, including some with specific levels of experience who are death penalty certified. These attorneys tend to command higher salaries than first year public defenders. They also need to hire security for the courtroom and prison where the death row inmates are usually held when they are waiting to walk the green mile. Security costs are often higher for death penalty cases because the death row inmates are usually housed separately from other

Open Document