Dead Man Walking Sparknotes

1052 Words3 Pages

Dead Man Walking is the story of Sister Helen Prejean’s involvement with death row convict Matthew Poncelet. Matthew Poncelet and Carl Vitello were charged and convicted of the kidnapping, rape and murder of Walter Delacroix and Hope Percy six years prior. Sister Helen agrees to help Poncelet with his last appeal after claiming his innocence and begins to bond with him as well as his and the victim’s families. Time runs short as Poncelet’s execution is set when the governor announces his campaign for re-election. During the course of their relationship, Sister Helen tries to provoke Poncelet to reveal the truth about the murders to save his soul. While Sister Helen faces criticism from friends and family, she struggles with her morals when …show more content…

While he did admit to the kidnapping and murder of Walter Delacroix and rape of Hope Percy before being executed; at his pardon hearing, Hilton mentioned to the board that Poncelet was given inadequate counsel by the state. The trial lawyer had previously worked in only tax law, had only raised one objection in the five-day length of the trial and had never participated in a capital murder trial. It had only taken them four hours to select the jury, which proves that the tax lawyer was not adequate enough to accurately represent Poncelet in a criminal trial. Hilton and Helen accepted the Governor’s very public meeting which denied the extension of Poncelet’s execution date when they were told it would be private. Furthermore, neither Hilton or Helen had tried to find more evidence of the first lawyer’s incompetence which could have possibly lead to a retrial and could have at least ended with Poncelet receiving a life sentence. Matthew’s last words were how he believes that killing is wrong regardless of who commits the crime, including the government. Sister Helen had spoken to a guard at Angola about the death penalty where he wonders why she can’t see the execution as justice when the bible quotes an eye for an eye. Her rebuttal is that she does not believe “in killing people to say killing people is …show more content…

After she had her the families stories she began to struggle more with her faith when her job was only to advise Matthew in his spiritual beliefs. Instead of trying to teach him how to save his soul, she focused more on the crime itself. Talking to the families makes the audience believe she is struggling to continue her work and looking for a reason to stop helping him. Her visiting the families is parallel to if his lawyer would have gone and sat with them. Sister Helen’s bond with Matthew seemed inappropriate for what her job was and is seen through her comments about his appearance up to the kiss on his shoulder and declaration of love before he dies. As a Nun and spiritual advisor, she was tasked with his spiritual well being not being an emotional crutch or family servant as he had asked her to do multiple things his mother should have, for example, Sister Helen made all of the funeral arrangements and found him a lawyer for his last

Open Document