The death penalty is a controversial topic across the United States with endless arguments of why it is right or wrong. In class we were able to personally see how the death penalty effects families and alters lives. After watching Dead Man Walking I was able to see the many things that make it such a controversial topic.
In 1995, Tom Robbins directed the movie entitled Dead Man Walking starring Susan Sarandon and Sean Penn. The movie is about a heart wrenching relationship between Sister Helen Prejean and Matthew Poncelet during his time before execution. Matthew Poncelet writes Sister Helen which leads to her visiting him at Louisiana's Angola State Prison. He asks Sister Helen to be his spiritual advisor through the process leading up
…show more content…
The death penalty does not allow for an individual to have a second chance. Sister Helen mentioned in her speech at University of Dayton last week that “ the death penalty provides no room for redemption” and that “a person is not as bad as his worst deed to warrant the death penalty”. Sister Helen Prejean mentions “Albert Camus” suggesting that no government should have the power to lay claim to absolute a power as death” in her book called “Dead Man Walking by Vintage Books Edition, June 1994. I agree especially when the justice system and process is a fallible system with inevitable flaws and innocent people dying. The Ohioan Task Force for cessation of the death penalty states that “ Mistakes will happen. That’s human nature”, along with unfairness that is a certainty given these facts the death penalty must be stopped. Through life and situations all humans make mistakes, should they be put to death for it? What good does killing them and repeating the cycle resolve. As Mahatma Gandhi says “An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind.” By killing someone with the death penalty the justice system is allowing them to escape their conscience, but if they are given life they are forced to think about what they have done every day. By giving them life in prison they are able to rehabilitate and become a better
Many people are led to believe that the death penalty doesn’t occur very often and that very few people are actually killed, but in reality, it’s quite the opposite. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1,359 people have been executed as a result of being on death row since 1977 to 2013. Even though this form of punishment is extremely controversial, due to the fact that someone’s life is at stake, it somehow still stands to this very day as our ultimate form of punishment. Although capital punishment puts murderers to death, it should be abolished because killing someone who murdered another, does not and will not make the situation any better in addition to costing tax payers millions of dollars.
Everyone has an opinion on capital punishment and the death penalty. However, most people never have to think about the person being executed or the circumstances that put them on death row. The movie Dead Man Walking allows the average person to peek into this often hidden world. Although, I can say my view on the death penalty has not been altered, I cannot say that this movie and its presentation of capital punishment did not move me emotionally.
The death penalty has always been a subject of controversy. Some say that it is a barbaric practice that should be done away with while others claim it to be necessary to ensure the safety of modern society. Either way, capital punishment has always remained a grey area in the
...ngs Police Department. Life imprisonment with out the possibility of parole is an equally effective, cheaper, and more humane way to punish capital criminals. Not only is the cost of executing a prisoner ridiculous, but the death penalty has in no way shown that it deters criminal activity. The abolishment of the death penalty is necessary to achieve the utopian society we as a nation so desire.
I believe that the movie Dead Man Walking impacted my life greatly. It was a very emotional and moving movie. This was an excellent movie because it portrayed the feelings of both the families of the victims and the murder himself. It shows how much pain and suffering the families had to go through with all the sadness and hatred against Matthew Poncelant. The movie also showed how that the families' hatred did not go away after Matthew was executed. The greatest emotional part of the movie was when Matthew confessed that he did kill the teenagers and that he was truly sorry. From there, he was able to at least die with dignity and also he asked the parents of the teenagers for their forgiveness for him. This movie also showed how the death penalty is biased on those who are poor. Matthew's partner in the crime received life in prison because he had a better lawyer while Matthew received the death penalty. As stated in appeals session in the movie, Matthew would not have been sitting there if he had the money to buy a better lawyer. Instead he had to have a lawyer given to him by the state who had never preformed a murder trial before. I think that Susan Serandan's character was portrayed as a good Samaritan. I believe this because, like Samaritan's back in the time of Jesus, no-one likes to help a murder. Yet she came to his side and was there for him when he needed her. She carried out all his requests even though the parents of the victims' families castrated her and thou...
Main Point 1: Imagine someone that has been accused of murder and sentenced to death row has to spend almost 17-20 years in jail and then one day get kill. Then later on the person that they killed was not the right person.
The death penalty, ever since it was established, has created a huge controversy all throughout the world. Ever since the death penalty was created, there have been people who supported the death penalty and those who wanted to destroy it. When the death penalty was first created the methods that were used were gruesome and painful, it goes against the Eighth Amendment that was put in place many years later. The methods they used were focused on torturing the people and putting them through as much pain as possible. In today’s society the death penalty is quick and painless, it follows the Eighth Amendment. Still there are many people who are against capital punishment. The line of whether to kill a man or women for murder or to let him or her spend the rest one’s life in prison forever will never be drawn in a staight.
Those who are for the death penalty argue that without it the murderers would be released back into society, only to kill again. They believe in the saying “an eye for an eye”; and that life in prison is not a cruel enough punishment, but that the only way to stop further murders is death. In fact, there have been cases that show legitimacy to this belief. In one occurrence, author Mike Royko exemplifies that “at the time of his [the murderer] trial it was mentioned that this was his second murder.” This murderer had been tried twice, for two different murders, while this is true some murderers have come back to society to kill again, that does not mean all criminals will follow that path. There are many cases in which men are sent to life in prison without the chance of parole; in which case the criminal cannot kill again and does not have to be killed. Legalizing the death penalty is allowing “one person to judge another incapable of rehabilitation” (King).
The death penalty continues to be an issue of controversy and is an issue that will be debated in the United States for many years to come. According to Hugo A. Bedau, the writer of “The Death Penalty in America”, capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty. The death penalty has been used since ancient times for a variety of offenses. The Bible says that death should be done to anyone who commits murder, larceny, rapes, and burglary. It appears that public debate on the death penalty has changed over the years and is still changing, but there are still some out there who are for the death penalty and will continue to believe that it’s a good punishment. I always hear a lot of people say “an eye for an eye.” Most people feel strongly that if a criminal took the life of another, their’s should be taken away as well, and I don’t see how the death penalty could deter anyone from committing crimes if your going to do the crime then at that moment your not thinking about being on death role. I don’t think they should be put to death they should just sit in a cell for the rest of their life and think about how they destroy other families. A change in views and attitudes about the death penalty are likely attributed to results from social science research. The changes suggest a gradual movement toward the eventual abolition of capital punishment in America (Radelet and Borg, 2000).
Throughout the years the death penalty has been a very controversial aspect when it comes to punishment. Some groups of people believe that is should be abolished and other think that America should keep it. I’m here to say that I am not for the death penalty at all. To me the death penalty has a couple of flaws that I have an issue looking past. The death penalty is very unconstitutional for anyone who is put through it and it is very bias on who it chooses for the punishment.
One of the most repetitive and controversial topics discussed in the criminal justice system, is the death penalty. Capital punishment has been a part of our nation’s history since the creation of our constitution. In fact, as of January 1st, 2016, 2,943 inmates were awaiting their fate on death row (Death Penalty Information Center). Throughout my life, I have always been a strong advocate for the death penalty. During the majority of my undergraduate degree, I was a fierce supporter of capital punishment when discussing the topic in classes. However, throughout many criminal justice courses, I found myself in the minority, regarding the abolishment of the death penalty. While debating this topic, I would always find myself sympathetic to the victims and their families, as one should be, wanting those who were responsible for heinous crimes to
The Death Penalty should be discontinued to the families, human rights, and statistics. The families of the victim and the family of the one, who committed the crime, have no closure at all. The death penalty is killing a human for being convicted of a terrible crime one family may think its right but both suffer by their lost ones. “Although true closure is never really possible for the families, studies have shown that the continual process, along with the returning to court for many years, force families to confront the gruesome details of the crime many times over, making it impossible to get on with their lives.
The key issues involve whether the U.S. should sustain the current death penalty system, abolish it in favor of life in prison without parole plus restitution, or only reform the system to make it less costly and free of class, racial, and mental illness discrepancies. Many people have a stake in the issue. Organizations such as Amnesty International and the American Civil Liberties Union are against the death penalty because they claim it is a cruel and unusual form of punishment, while other groups such as the National Center for Policy Analysis support the death penalty because they believe that life sentences do not deter homicide. Furthermore, victims’ families have a stake in the issue because they deserve justice for their murdered loved ones, and convicted murders have a stake because their own lives are in jeopardy as they sit on death row. Most importantly, all the citizens of the United States are involved in the matter, since the way in which we punish crime affects public safety.
capital punishment? With receiving life without parole the person has no chance of release by a parole board, even with good behavior. However, life sentences gives an inmate family and lawyer time to prove their innocence if they did not commit a crime. The wrongful execution of an innocent person is an injustice that can never be rectified. Since the reinstatement of the death penalty, 154 cases where men and women have been released from Death Row nationally, some only minutes away from execution. Inmates sentenced to capital punishment in recent years have had the privilege to get freedom due to the improvement of technology and how DNA evidence can prove they did not commit the crime. For example, my uncle who was sentenced to capital murder had evidence that could be tested for his DNA. During his trial evidence proved that his DNA was on none of the evidence presented but he had potential eye witness to identify him. The eye witnessed were paid friends of the other suspect involved in the crime. The witnesses later came back after his conviction and revealed they were paid and they lied about the stories. He was later executed but was never given a free chance to prove his innocence. It can be conceded that, if the maximum sentence an inmate could be given it could help free more innocent people. Supporters of the capital punishment feel it is beneficial because if a person kills someone they should be
Growing up Catholic and pro life I don't believe anyone has the right to take another's life away. God gave life and only he can take it away. As I learn more and more about these possible solutions or needs for the death penalty I'm indecisive. I have heard of cases where the criminal escapes high security and gets out to the public causing even more harm. I believe that if a criminal escapes jail once then, the death penalty can be taken as an option. The whole purpose of jail or the capital punishment is to keep the society free from harm and when one person violates that, jail time should always be applied. Once the criminal has a chance to do it again, they need a higher form of punishment. It is a difficult decision to make since it is a person's life and even after reading texts and stories of individuals affected in one way or another I don't have a clear cut perspective on the death penalty. I believe that each case is unique and should be viewed in a specific