Daniel Akst Greed

838 Words2 Pages

In his essay, “Thrift: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Virtue,” Daniel Akst describes how personal debt has risen with people’s knowledge yet they continue to keep drowning in it. Over time, the people have forgotten thrift, and now the effects are showing. Akst argues that there are two choices. One can either save money or be in poverty. Whereas Akst took a black and white interpretation, James Livingston insists that spending is not at fault but what type of spending it is.
As stated by Akst, today’s debts are a significant problem. It’s accumulated to a total over ten trillion, peaking in U.S.’s history. Excessive spending done by both, the U.S. government and its citizens, produced such a massive debt. A simple solution to this ordeal is thrift, the state of saving and using money …show more content…

However, the idea of saving became heinous to the general public. Saving money isn’t sexually appealing since it doesn’t cater to what the people want. It won’t attract or be used by anyone on that basic need. Saving money actually generates wealth, which causes envy. One could have achieved the greatest feat possible, but if others are jealous, one will be recognized for the negative connotations. Nonetheless, thrifting was favorable at one point in U.S.’s history. Puritan’s beliefs of temperance and diligence matches with thrift’s. Even Benjamin Franklin strongly endorsed thrift despite barely being a puritan. This inspired Samuel Smiles to publish an entire book solely to thrift in the 19th century. Despite these spikes of thrifts, the nail in the coffin was between 1880’s and 1920’s. The economic growth strengthened capitalist beliefs. The surge of mass communication, the rise of consumer credit, and less extreme religious perspectives allowed consumerism to denominate. Two social theorists studied more into this phenomenon: Thorstein Veblen and Simon Patten. Veblen’s theory of conspicuous consumption

Open Document