Dalit space in Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay’s “Mahesh” and Mahasweta Devi’s “Shikar”

2963 Words6 Pages

The globalization and the subsequent flourishing of ‘englishes’ have dismantled the monolith of ‘the’ English Literary Canon by bringing into effect ‘new’ literatures and various interdisciplinary principles and approaches that have in way effected a ‘re-ordering’ of the existing order . In such a moment of paradigmatic shifts – especially in the wake of the postcolonial theories and the subaltern studies - the emergence of the Dalit Literature/s provides ample scope for examining the ‘politics of representation’. However, my paper is not concerned as much with the question of the Dalit Literature proper as with the dynamics of the polemical word – ‘dalit’ – and with how, besides a registered manifestation of physical / tangible ‘violence’ or ‘resistance’, not always of course, constant negotiations between narratives and counter-narratives mark the ‘dalit space’ . For this I rely on the elasticity of the term ‘dalit’ and intend to show how the term, often misunderstood, implies “masses exploited and oppressed economically, socially, culturally in the name of religion and other factors” and also how ‘dalit space’ becomes ‘vocal’, and sometimes achieves ‘liminality’ through inter-religion/inter-racial correspondence . In “Mahesh”, Gafur, a Muslim, challenges what Ambedkar called the caste Hindu’s tolerant behavior towards non-Hindus, and suffers the ‘position’ of a dalit who finally registers a passive resistance through ‘dislocation’ . On the other hand, in “Shikar”, Mary Oraon, an organic intellectual, comes out of the constraints of dalit position as she is the cross-product of an inter-racial coupling, as she ‘hunts’ the (in)human predator and also as she embraces the ‘brave new world’.

Instead of plunging directly into my ...

... middle of paper ...

...fy.

Works Cited

1. Brooker,Peter, A Glossary of Cultural Theory, Arnold, Great Britain, 2003.
2. Dangle, Arjun, ed. Poisoned Bread, Orient blackswan, rev. ed.2009.
3. Griffiths, Gareth and Ashcroft, Bill and Menin, Sarah, The Empire Writes Back : Theory and Practices in Post-colonial literatures, Routledge, 2nd rev. ed. 2002.
4. Gupta, Vandana, Mahasweta Devi : A Critical Reading, Creative Books, New Delhi, 2009.
5. Limbale, Sharankumar, Towards an Aesthetics of Dalit Literature : History, Controversies and Considerations, Orient Blackswan, 2004.
6. Nair, Bindu, the essay-“Subversion and resistance : The uses of Myth in Mahasweta Devi’s “The Hunt” and The Book of the Hunter”, Littcrit, vol-34, no-2, December 2008.
7. Sinha, Sasadhar, The Draught and Other Stories, Sahitya akademi, New Delhi, 2004.
8. Spivak,G.C. translation, Imaginary Maps, Thema, Calcutta, 1993.

Open Document