Cut Off Argument Essay

503 Words2 Pages

Cut Off, Louisiana is a small Cajun town set along the southern length of Bayou Lafourche. It is about as far south as one can go in Louisiana. Circa 1850s, this quaint bayou community prospered on the rich natural resources including shrimping and fishing, which became a way of life. Living off the land is a unique feature which defines the typical Cajun mentality. Growing up, I considered it to be paradise, with little interest in life outside of Cut Off. We are isolated as the name suggests, but I wouldn't trade it for anything. Isolation, however, led to some degree of ignorance and unawareness. Twenty miles inshore and surrounded by water, Cut Off is a sport fishing capital of the south. I remember crossing Little Lake early one morning in mid May 2010. It was a sunny day perfect for fishing. The water was unusually clear and I noticed pieces of debris suspended a few inches below the surface. After closer inspection, I had no idea what this substance was. At this point the BP oil spill had not yet become the epic disaster that would eventually be realized. But it was coming like it or not. And it was sooner than expected as I …show more content…

My home town of Cut Off was in for a change. Culturally unique ways of life would never be the same. As a result of the spill numerous commercial fishing businesses which had been in operation for many generations came to a tragic end. To make matters worse, the BP settlement money failed to adequately compensate the very people that were most affected. This largely was a result of the fact that most of the locals operated as cash businesses, which led to underestimating tax liability (for obvious reasons). Ignorance and unawareness allowed for shaky tax practices, and whether ethical or not, it resulted in under compensation since the settlement calculation was based on tax returns. But what is adequate compensation for losing one's

More about Cut Off Argument Essay

Open Document