Cry The Beloved Country Essay

1466 Words3 Pages

In Alan Paton’s Cry, the Beloved Country, Stephen and John Kumalo have distinctly different views on the value of the tribe. Throughout the novel, these differences are the source of much conflict between the brothers, as both are eager to voice their opinions. Stephen Kumalo believes in the value of the tribe, as it nurtures its members and keeps them from trouble. John Kumalo, on the other hand, rejects the authority of the tribe and embraces the freedom of living independently. While both brothers have valid support for their beliefs, Stephen Kumalo has the most realistic view of the value of the tribe, as it provides a much-needed structure for its people. Stephen Kumalo is justified in bemoaning the breaking of the tribe, as a broken tribe tears families apart and creates gaps in …show more content…

While John Kumalo is a harsh critic of the tribe, and advocates for freedom from its rule, his points fail to acknowledge the dangers of such behavior. This is seen when John states, “At least I am free of an old and ignorant man, who is nothing but a white man’s dog… It is breaking apart, your tribal society. It is here in Johannesburg that the new society is being built” (145). While it is true that a new society is being built, it is not a positive society, but rather one riddled with crime. As discussed above, the break with the tribe creates a group of people who, lacking a familiar environment, turn to crime and illegal activity. As a result of this violence, it is also a society which instills fear into the minds of many, seen when the narrator discusses the tragedy of violence. “Cry, the beloved country, for the unborn child that is the inheritor of our fear. Let him not love the earth too deeply. Let him not laugh too gladly when the water runs through his fingers, nor stand too silent when the setting sun makes red the veld with fire… For fear will rob him of all if he gives too much.”

Open Document