Critical Analysis Of Mona Lisa Smile

1233 Words3 Pages

The movie Mona Lisa Smile is set in 1953; post-war and pre-feminism. Katherine Ann Watson, a progressive Art History teacher, is hired to teach at Wellesley. This selective all-women’s college is described in the opening scenes of the film as “the most conservative university in the country” (Newell, “Mona Lisa Smile”, 2003). Watson wants to teach at Wellesley in order to influence the next generation of women. Some of the brightest female students in the country attended Wellesley. Among these students are: Joan Brandwyn, a driven student with a 4.0 GPA, Betty Warren, the daughter of the Alumni Association president, Giselle Levy, a flirtatious and outgoing young woman who has had an affair with a Wellesley teacher (Bill Dunbar), and Connie Baker. These women are bright, and largely members of the upper class. Their social class not only affords them the Wellesley education but vacations abroad and elaborate parties and weddings. Watson quickly realizes that the goal for the students at Wellesley is not just to get an education, but to get a husband. This fact is in direct conflict with Watson’s own desire to help the female students grow into independent women. The school nurse, Amanda Armstrong, believes in the importance of female independence as well. Both Watson and Armstrong’s beliefs are met with disapproval by …show more content…

Her homosexuality would certainly be considered a deviant behavior in 1953. The characters in the film, however, just seem to ignore it. There is no indication that Armstrong’s sexuality has even garnered a moral stigma among her coworkers or peers. She has somehow passed as meeting the norms, or expectations, of her society. When it is revealed that Armstrong has provided contraception to female students, however, she is fired. The fact that her behavior could influence the adherence of others to the norms was apparently more deviant than her personal

Open Document