Critical Analysis Of Inside Job

1039 Words3 Pages

Inside Job and the Economic Crisis in 2008 The film Inside Job is a documentary film that had been conducted by Charles Ferguson about the World Financial Economic Crisis in 2008. The film attempts to show what happened during the Financial Crisis and what events lead to the economic collapse. In addition, the film also describes the greed of the ones who hold a higher position in financial companies that conduct to corruption for they manage to manipulate the economic meltdown in 2008, letting most of their middle-class citizen homeless and also jobless. Aside from that, the author wanted the viewer to take a glimpse of the reason why economic breakdown. For, it’s not because the higher up or the government does not do things that they are It also explains why so little has been done to straighten out the financial world or bring justice to the criminal instead of doing nothing. The movie review (2010) the financial sector in an establishment of fraud. It was stated that the large investment banks (Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Lehman Brother, Merrill Lynch, and Bear Stearns), politicians (whom many of them were previously a bankers), financial corporation (Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase), regulators, insurance companies (AIG, MBIA, AMBAC), credit ratings agencies (Moody’s, Standard&Poors, Fitch), and academics established a connection to one another in performing a fraud from wanting to gain Based on the fact that had been bought by Inman and Kingsley, it spotted that plenty of academics or economists that support the banks and the new deregulation without researching for the truth behind it. But in actually, they took a large amount of cash in writing a poorly researched report. An example for one of the economist that twists the written fact is Frederic Mishkin. In 2006, Mishkin was paid a large amount sum by the Iceland Chamber of Commerce to praise the Iceland’s economy stability and yes, he wrote it. But after the collapsed of the Iceland’s financial, Mishkin changed his report again (ByrnePoets, 18, & 2011, 2011). Thus, it explains the tight relations between both academics and government that appear to be more hand in

Open Document