Corrupt Political Parties

474 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Role of political parties in american political culture essay

“I was well satisfied that our Country, under all the circumstances of the case, had a right to take, and was bound in duty and interest, to take a Neutral position.”1 President George Washington believed that the best way to keep our nation united was to take a neutral political stance. He looked at both sided and found the good and the bad of the political parties of his day and he realized that these parties are not the best ways to run this nation. President Washington was right about these parties, they don’t unite our nation as one, but they split it into two or sometimes even three or four different types of people, and these people and parties are always going after each other and finding the faults of their rival party. Political parties are an evil and corrupt way to run a government. First, when a representative of any certain political party runs for a government position, he is “more concerned with maintaining their own party's control over their rivals rather than serving the interests of the people.”2 The politicians don’t want what is best for the people, rather they will only do what they believe will tear down the other party and build theirs up. Politicians lie and will do whatever it takes to get the public to side with them, the worst part about political parties, is presidential candidates no longer run to help our …show more content…

In this day and age we are seeing what George Washington for told as the “the baneful effects of the spirit of party”3. These parties are tearing our nation apart, and it is being torn more now than it ever has

Show More
Related

  • Analysis of The Party Is Over by Mile Lofgren

    766 Words  | 2 Pages

    In closing, this book informs us on how the Republicans went crazy and Democrats became useless, and how it’s become a problem. The books unfolds the faults of the Republicans and Democrats “behind the scenes”, and made me more aware of the parties today.

    Read More

  • James Madison Political Party Analysis

    1085 Words  | 3 Pages

    The effects should be controlled to combat the evil. This correlates with his writings in Federalist No. 10. A strong government can counteract the evils of party by ensuring political equality among all, preventing the government from playing favorites, treating all interest fairly and allowing parties to check each other, enlarging the sphere. He illustrates that the United States has always had periods where there were divisions among the people, such as during the revolution and during the time of the Constitution

    Read More

  • The Inevitable Two-Party System in the U.S.

    1535 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first political parties in America began to form at the end of the 18th century. "The conflict that took shape in the 1790s between the Federalists and the Antifederalists exercised a profound impact on American history." The two primary influences, Thomas Jefferson a...

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalists And Republicans

    1004 Words  | 3 Pages

    George Washington the first president of the United States had a great duel ahead of him. Outraged citizens had a great deal of tension before his term, but when he entered into office those feelings of frustration arose. The Americans commenced to contradicting the ideas and beliefs of their counterparts, these hostile events eventually lead to the clashing of the citizens. Both sides were infuriated with one another, so they formed separate parties known as Republicans and Federalists. These clashes were instituted by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison of the Republican Party, along with Alexander Hamilton of the Federalist Party. Alexander Hamilton and The Federalists supported a strong central government, and they believed that without one an individual would have too much power possibly forming an anarchy, while the Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and

    Read More

  • Gabriel Garcia Marquez

    6018 Words  | 13 Pages

    Although initially forming around the nucleus of two distinct and different ideologies, long years of bloody conflict have served to significantly erode the distinctions between the parties. The Conservatives and the Liberals are more like warring factions or clans than any parties with firmly established and radically different ideologies. Both tend to be repressive, both are corrupt, and bot...

    Read More

  • Factionalism in America

    1750 Words  | 4 Pages

    In discussing the problems surrounding the issue of factionalism in American society, James Madison concluded in Federalist #10, "The inference to which we are brought is that the causes of cannot be removed and that relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its effects." (Federalist Papers 1999, 75) In many ways, the nature of American politics has revolved around this question since our country's birth. What is the relationship between parties and government? Should the party serve as an intermediary between the populace and government, and how should a government respond to disparate ideas espoused by the factions inherent to a free society. This paper will discuss the political evolution that has revolved around this question, examining different "regimes" and how they attempted to reconcile the relationship between power and the corresponding role of the people. Beginning with the Federalists themselves, we will trace this evolution until we reach the contemporary period, where we find a political climate described as "interest-group liberalism." Eventually this paper will seek to determine which has been the most beneficial, and which is ultimately preferable.

    Read More

  • The Failure of Jacksonian Democrats

    1411 Words  | 3 Pages

    Democracy, a new form of government, a government for the people, was seen in different lights. As time progresses, the government becomes firmer in its regime and doctrine, yet keeps the same focus; for the people. The United States was created for the people, and by the people, and the need for the people to continue to be the main focus was crucial. However, once Jackson was elected president, the idea of people staying the main focus of government began to falter. Those who support Jackson wished for something in return, and Andrew Jackson supported the rights of the spoils system, thus giving his people the seats they thought they deserved. However, as time went on, the focus on the people slowly changed to what those in those special seats wanted. Jacksonian Democrats, who viewed themselves as the guardians of the United States Constitution under the presidency of Andrew Jackson claimed to have held the interest of the common people in high regard, altering not only our Forefathers’ electoral processes but the government as a whole. However, through their actions toward their common people, the uprooting of Native Americans, and the fatality of a national bank, they eventually created a larger mess than just a “kitchen cabinet” could withstand.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Political Parties

    889 Words  | 2 Pages

    In George Washington's farewell address, he specifically warned of "the baneful effects of the spirit of party,"(Washington 1). To Washington, political parties were a deep threat to the health of the nation for they allowed "a small but artful and enterprising minority" to "put in the place of the delegated will of the Nation, the will of a party,"(Washington 1). Even the first president of this nation warned against the dangers of forming poltical parties. The political parties divide the nation instead of unite the nation. Doing away with political parties will eliminate the chance of an unjust congress and enable a true Democracy to be formed in the United States.

    Read More

  • Electoral College Reform

    1903 Words  | 4 Pages

    A platform of “A Vote For Every American” should pass the lips of every elected official until this problem is rectified. Americans must work together to solve this problem, allowing a new and better system to give way to a fair and just system of electing the next United States’ President. Bibliography Beck, Paul Allen, and Hershey, Marjorie Randon. Party Politics in America? 9th Ed. -.

    Read More

  • Why Is George Washington Against The Two Parties

    293 Words  | 1 Pages

    George Washington was fully against the two parties, Especially since it caused so many problems. Yes he did acknowledge it may have its perks but he made very clear and good points on the downfalls. With the two parties as he was in office It had gotten to the point that loyalty had gotten down to personal bitterness along with personal destruction. this also just so happened to have been the biggest split since the inception of the republic. This had taken a big toll on washington. This had weighed so heavily on him that when he wrote how much parties can actually destroy the sensitivity unity that was the glue that held the nation together. Washington realized that these parties thirst for more power would only grow until it consumed them.

    Read More

  • Political Parties in the United States

    1812 Words  | 4 Pages

    Political parties have been around since almost the beginning of this great country. Although George Washington strongly opposed political parties, and also warned the nation to stay away from forming political parties, the first political parties were formed right under his own nose. In George Washington’s cabinet was where the first parties started. The cause of these parties was simply differences in views. The thought of leaders of these two completely different parties was Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Jefferson started what then was known of as Republican or the Anti-Federalist. On the other hand Hamilton started what was known of as the Federalist Party. Both of these parties formed in the seventeen hundreds. These two parties have evolved into today being known as the Democratic, and the Republican parties. On the contrary one of the largest third party groups, the tea party was formed just recently in the year two thousand and nine. All three of these political parties effect our government today.

    Read More

  • New Deal Dbq

    1241 Words  | 3 Pages

    When one defines party identification, strong party loyalty is central. However, a cursory glance over the previous one hundred years of American history shows that politics has changed, so too the public’s response. While multiple factors may contribute to changes in voting and public opinion, national identity and economic conditions play major roles when viewing the outcome in retrospect. The American voter has evolved from being party-oriented to candidate-centered.

    Read More

  • Political Party Divison is the Problem

    1213 Words  | 3 Pages

    The biggest problem in America today is that the party line has been drawn over our lives, drawn down the center of the nation, drawn through our homes and families. Rather than Republicans and Democrats agreeing on a vision of America but disagreeing on the means to achieve it, the two parties point their fingers, call their opponents names, and declare the other side unpatriotic. The Republicans are running on a platform of “the Democrats will destroy America”, while the Democrats do practically nothing at all, proud to not be Republicans. And we, the people, call them leaders. We, the people, elected them. We, the people, make their jobs easy because we, the people whom they have sworn to serve, don’t question them.

    Read More

  • Political And Changes In American Politics

    201 Words  | 1 Pages

    Many of today's citizens expect the same results to occur from politics and the government, as they expected two hundred years ago. In todays time, to win an election a party must win over the presidency, both houses of the national Congress, many of the governorships, and a lot in the state legislation, and then hold each long enough to overcome opponents in the bureaucracies and courts of lands. Also throughout history, the American political system has changed tremendously throughout the years in partisan balance about every thirty-five years. However, the founding fathers believed that the politics would be organized to hold the best men in the community, located in an institutional environment where debate and inquiry would arose the

    Read More

  • Understanding Political Parties: Definitions and Roles

    1078 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of modern parties (both in US and other countries) behave not up to this noble standard. They promise a lot to get elected, but when they come to power they forget many of their election promises. Such behavior has simple explanation – the main goal of any modern party is to be elected. In many cases promises represent only a convenient propaganda tool. Probably the best description of irresponsibility of modern politicians was provided by Frances E. Lee in 2013”: ““Political irresponsibly” means taking little interest in the immediate or short-term policy consequences of one’s actions and instead looking with hope toward a future electoral victory. Irresponsibility in politics takes many forms. But, in general, it means a failure to make a good faith effort to participate constructively in legislative problem solving. Irresponsible politicians can always allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good. They can champion unrealistic initiatives that are “all gain and no pain,” such as new tax cuts or government spending without regard for fiscal balance” (Lee, 2013, p.

    Read More

More about Corrupt Political Parties

Open Document