Pros And Cons Of Being A Coroner

1317 Words3 Pages

There are two things in life that are inevitable: death and taxes. The coroner system was founded upon both of those undeniable facts of life. The kings of the middle ages initially created the position of a coroner to investigate the suspicious deaths of people and also to collect the death tax on the deceased’s estate. In the United States, we have two positions that work in the field of death investigating, obviously the coroner and the medical examiner. These positions are widely different in how they run. To be a medical examiner, one must have many years of experience in medical school, and they must be board-approved. However, for a coroner’s position, the people in the state elect a campaigning candidate, and that candidate does not …show more content…

Although, blaming the coroner position is not the correct idea. It is the lack of a budget and pay for these departments that is causing a lack of interest in the field, and therefore a decline in employed MEs. The salary of a medical examiner in Boston, now, is around $95,000, compared to in 2000, the salary was as high as $200,000 (Bartlett). If the job employment is in an MEs only state, which entitles a huge amount of paperwork and autopsies, along with that seemingly small amount of pay, then the job obviously becomes less sought after (Rocheleau). What is also outrageous, is the amount of school one has to do to become a medical examiner. To become a forensic pathologist, the minimum amount of college education is around 13 years (Van Berkel). It takes up an immense amount of time to become an medical examiner, and as such, the field is underemployed, leading to those inefficiencies in the offices. Eliminating the coroner position does not help nor stimulate the growth of the field, since the coroner position is relatively easy to become without any college requirements. As an elected official, a coroner has the power to make decisions and is the best representatives of a community’s needs and values (Parrott). The debate should not be on eliminating the coroner position, as the job maintains the balance of workload and represents the wishes of the people in the state who elected the official. Instead, the debate should be focused on the budget for these departments. In 2000, the National Association of Medical Examiners found the Massachusetts agency was $10 million short of the recommended budget, as well, which likely resulted in the cut of pay for future medical examiners

More about Pros And Cons Of Being A Coroner

Open Document